Jedox vs Oracle Hyperion comparison

Jedox and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Jedox is ranked #12, while Oracle is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.6. Jedox holds a 4.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jedox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Jedox

Read 13 Jedox reviews

1,777 Views
977 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Hyperion

Read 58 Oracle Hyperion reviews

3,124 Views
2,093 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Jedox

Oracle Hyperion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Oracle Hyperion and Jedox are powerful solutions competing in enterprise performance management. Oracle Hyperion holds a competitive edge with its scalability and robust planning capabilities, making it ideal for comprehensive financial processes. Jedox, however, is favored for its flexibility, offering agile reporting solutions.

Features: Oracle Hyperion is known for its robust calculation engine, extensive ERP integration, and scalability, supporting large budget cycles. Jedox provides intuitive dashboarding, easy data integration from various sources, and dynamic reporting, suitable for organizations seeking interactive solutions.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Hyperion needs to enhance its documentation, support responsiveness, and address performance issues with large datasets. Jedox could improve its front-end design, modernize its user interface, and refine its technical support framework.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Hyperion offers on-premises and hybrid cloud options, providing flexibility but facing criticism for inconsistent technical support. Jedox presents public cloud deployment but also has reported issues with support consistency. Customer service for both indicates room for improvement.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Hyperion is a premium choice, suited for large enterprises justifying the cost with extensive feature use, offering significant ROI through efficiency gains. Jedox is more cost-effective, appealing to smaller businesses with scalable needs, and offers flexible licensing for better accessibility and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,515 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jedox

Ranking in Business Performance Management

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Hyperion

Ranking in Business Performance Management

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Jedox is 4.0%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Hyperion is 4.9%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Hyperion	4.9%
Jedox	4.0%
Other	91.1%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Riyaz Halani

Financial Controller at Zalando SE

Powerful BI tool for analyzing financial performance and stable performance

I would rate the scalability of Jedox a seven out of ten. There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself. So that's where the main improvements lie—making it easy for people to not depend on just technical finance teams. There are almost 50 to 60 users using Jedox in our organization.

Read full review

Srinivas Chappidi

Product Support Engineer at JSW

Empower financial planning with user-friendly and robust features

The best features of Oracle Hyperion revolve around their cloud-based technology, which is gradually moving to cloud solutions such as EPMCSG, while Anaplan uses two engines for calculations, the classic engine and the Essbase engine. Anaplan allows for quick module changes, where adjustments in one module reflect throughout the user experience. In contrast, Oracle Hyperion relies on Essbase as a database with calculation scripts and business rules, and it incorporates Smart View technology for Excel connections, providing a familiar interface for users. Oracle Hyperion is fundamentally a good technology and does not require significant improvements compared to other technologies because it is user-friendly and offers several advantages in financial reporting and consolidation. However, I have observed that Anaplan has built-in UX pages for report preparation, unlike Oracle Hyperion, which often relies on third-party tools such as Hyperion Financial Reporting and Power BI for reporting.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool."

"The solution is very versatile."

"The data entry point is most valuable. The way we can customize our report or do data entry is very good."

"We use the tool for performance management and planning."

"The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage."

"The ETL function simplifies many tasks."

"The EPM is the most valuable feature."

"The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in."

More Jedox pros

"This product is very scalable and provides high ROI."

"Oracle Hyperion is an advanced analytical calculation engine that can handle aggregation."

"The accuracy of data gathering and consolidation is very good."

"This solution provides a more structured methodology for doing analysis than a tool like Excel. It creates a central database that keeps all information in one place."

"The latest cloud version is more efficient for financial implementations."

"Functionality-wise, it is what they say it is. It is the best in class, but it all ties back to your users. If your users are completely enamored with Excel spreadsheets, then breaking those habits is hard."

"It's basically the same as the other budgeting solutions."

"The roll-up potential of the product is very good, meaning we have detailed information and we want it to be summarized, based on geography, based on different product lines, or based on different charts of accounts in the general ledger. It rolls up the information in a very concise way. This makes it easy to understand the overall performance, for it's forecasting aspects, or quarterly reporting, year to year, or month to month reporting."

More Oracle Hyperion pros

Cons

"The tool has changed its pricing and it's now too expensive for small and medium organizations. I miss the open-source version which was free and we could do a lot of things with it."

"The solution needs to improve its support. The visualization in Microsoft BI is more modern and comfortable than Jedox's. I would expect something similar with the solution."

"I think it's the design of the report because the design and the UI for the report is standard and lame. When you see a Jedox report, it doesn't seem like it's from today, because the technology is something from the last decade. The scalability needs improvement."

"I don't find it particularly user-friendly."

"More emphasis is needed on the availability of the learning aspect of the solution. Because unless you take up their course that enables you to be an expert in creating the report, you must seek help."

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

"There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself."

"Jedox should improve the design and server issues."

More Jedox cons

"I have not seen return on investment from using Oracle Hyperion."

"Integrating Oracle Hyperion, a multidimensional database, with relational databases poses challenges due to the differing database structures."

"Oracle EPM Cloud solutions have simplified the security model. Nevertheless, it would be better having a more differentiated security model."

"There can be an improvement in many regards with the dimensions, the metadata, the interfaces, as well as the integration."

"Hyperion has much room for improvement, especially disaster recovery. You don't have the option to choose the proper disaster recovery method. We have Hyperion and an SQL server on the backend. We have active solutions for the backend database server, which aren't working for our people. They've asked us to remove the high availability to increase application performance."

"I would love more comment capabilities so that you could put in little notes, cheat notes."

"The initial setup of Oracle Hyperion is very difficult."

"The interface could be better. It could be more user-friendly, it is not very intuitive."

More Oracle Hyperion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"Excellent value for money."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"To get a full license, which gives you access to most of the different Hyperion programs, it costs $2000 to $2500 a month."

"The licenses cost approximately $1,000."

"Oracle Hyperion is not an inexpensive solution."

"The licensing cost for the on-premises version of the solution is too high."

"It might be considered relatively costly compared to some alternatives."

"Oracle Hyperion's licensing structures are quite expensive for some companies, especially medium-sized companies because of the user-based license."

"As Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, most businesses prefer to have their own private cloud."

"We pay for licensing yearly."

More Oracle Hyperion pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle Hyperion?

We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Hyperion?

We are going to re-implement the Oracle Hyperion system due to changes in our chart of account process and some other factors. We were analyzing whether to move to a cloud system, EPM Cloud. We hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Hyperion?

We are using Oracle Financials and Oracle Hyperion. Oracle Hyperion is used for budget and MIS reporting, while Financials is used for financial accounting, payables, receivables, and general ledge...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 15% of the time

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Board vs Jedox

Compared 6% of the time

OneStream XF vs Jedox

Compared 4% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

Oracle HFM vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Cognos vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 11% of the time

SAP Business Planning and Consolidation vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 8% of the time

Board vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Hyperion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jedox

January 2026

Download Jedox product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion

January 2026

Download Oracle Hyperion product report

Also Known As

Jedox EPM

Hyperion

Overview

Integrated Corporate Performance Management software provides reliable data, insights, and guidance to everyone in your company. Jedox delivers it all: Self-service budgeting, planning, and forecasting combined with intuitive analytics and BI dashboards in one integrated software platform. Users across the enterprise in any department from Finance to Sales, HR, and Procurement create integrated plans and reports based on the same data model and business logic. Integrate financial planning and analysis with operational plans and reporting to optimize processes, boost data quality, and slash planning cycles throughout the organization.

Jedox

Oracle Business Analytics Suite.

Oracle

Sample Customers

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

February 2026

Free Report: Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

Find out what your peers are saying about Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.