Jedox vs Oracle Hyperion comparison

Jedox and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Jedox is ranked #12, while Oracle is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.6. Jedox holds a 4.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jedox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Jedox

Read 13 Jedox reviews

1,777 Views
977 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Hyperion

Read 58 Oracle Hyperion reviews

3,124 Views
2,093 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Jedox

Oracle Hyperion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Oracle Hyperion and Jedox are powerful solutions competing in enterprise performance management. Oracle Hyperion holds a competitive edge with its scalability and robust planning capabilities, making it ideal for comprehensive financial processes. Jedox, however, is favored for its flexibility, offering agile reporting solutions.

Features: Oracle Hyperion is known for its robust calculation engine, extensive ERP integration, and scalability, supporting large budget cycles. Jedox provides intuitive dashboarding, easy data integration from various sources, and dynamic reporting, suitable for organizations seeking interactive solutions.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Hyperion needs to enhance its documentation, support responsiveness, and address performance issues with large datasets. Jedox could improve its front-end design, modernize its user interface, and refine its technical support framework.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Hyperion offers on-premises and hybrid cloud options, providing flexibility but facing criticism for inconsistent technical support. Jedox presents public cloud deployment but also has reported issues with support consistency. Customer service for both indicates room for improvement.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Hyperion is a premium choice, suited for large enterprises justifying the cost with extensive feature use, offering significant ROI through efficiency gains. Jedox is more cost-effective, appealing to smaller businesses with scalable needs, and offers flexible licensing for better accessibility and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,961 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jedox

Ranking in Business Performance Management

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Hyperion

Ranking in Business Performance Management

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Jedox is 4.0%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Hyperion is 4.9%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Hyperion	4.9%
Jedox	4.0%
Other	91.1%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Riyaz Halani

Financial Controller at Zalando SE

Powerful BI tool for analyzing financial performance and stable performance

I would rate the scalability of Jedox a seven out of ten. There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself. So that's where the main improvements lie—making it easy for people to not depend on just technical finance teams. There are almost 50 to 60 users using Jedox in our organization.

Read full review

Srinivas Chappidi

Product Support Engineer at JSW

Empower financial planning with user-friendly and robust features

The best features of Oracle Hyperion revolve around their cloud-based technology, which is gradually moving to cloud solutions such as EPMCSG, while Anaplan uses two engines for calculations, the classic engine and the Essbase engine. Anaplan allows for quick module changes, where adjustments in one module reflect throughout the user experience. In contrast, Oracle Hyperion relies on Essbase as a database with calculation scripts and business rules, and it incorporates Smart View technology for Excel connections, providing a familiar interface for users. Oracle Hyperion is fundamentally a good technology and does not require significant improvements compared to other technologies because it is user-friendly and offers several advantages in financial reporting and consolidation. However, I have observed that Anaplan has built-in UX pages for report preparation, unlike Oracle Hyperion, which often relies on third-party tools such as Hyperion Financial Reporting and Power BI for reporting.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The system is quite flexible. Based on our requirements, we create different cubes that can help us to do complete planning."

"The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage."

"The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in."

"The EPM is the most valuable feature."

"We can configure and have complete freedom while creating solutions."

"The solution is quick with analysis and calculation. The tool offers high digitalization which helps us to run the controlling department with less number of people. If the software wasn't there, I would need two to three people extra to run the department."

"The ETL function simplifies many tasks."

"The data entry point is most valuable. The way we can customize our report or do data entry is very good."

More Jedox pros

"The roll-up potential of the product is very good, meaning we have detailed information and we want it to be summarized, based on geography, based on different product lines, or based on different charts of accounts in the general ledger. It rolls up the information in a very concise way. This makes it easy to understand the overall performance, for it's forecasting aspects, or quarterly reporting, year to year, or month to month reporting."

"Its major impact is that it reduced manual work since using Oracle Hyperion, and Oracle Hyperion data can now be updated, with data loads completed in 30 minutes."

"Smart View is a really useful tool because we can have a good API with HFM."

"One can see that it's a mature product because it addresses all the requirements that you must need for financial consolidation and for budgeting and planning. It's really easy to use."

"Oracle has an integrated solution for Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) and Hyperion. It keeps the two platforms opened up to each other."

"We can integrate with any system and pull data from SAP or SQL Server. We can also design our own role files to establish how we pull the file data and store it in our database."

"Oracle Hyperion is fundamentally a good technology and does not require significant improvements compared to other technologies because it is user-friendly and offers several advantages in financial reporting and consolidation."

"Hyperion is helpful for all our budget processes."

More Oracle Hyperion pros

Cons

"From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process."

"More emphasis is needed on the availability of the learning aspect of the solution. Because unless you take up their course that enables you to be an expert in creating the report, you must seek help."

"Online pixel-perfect reporting is an aspect that has room for improvement."

"The solution needs to improve its support. The visualization in Microsoft BI is more modern and comfortable than Jedox's. I would expect something similar with the solution."

"The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end."

"There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself."

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

"There is not much training for Jedox."

More Jedox cons

"Hyperion has much room for improvement, especially disaster recovery. You don't have the option to choose the proper disaster recovery method. We have Hyperion and an SQL server on the backend. We have active solutions for the backend database server, which aren't working for our people. They've asked us to remove the high availability to increase application performance."

"Integrating Oracle Hyperion, a multidimensional database, with relational databases poses challenges due to the differing database structures."

"I would like to see more integrations with third-party vendors such as BigSense and SAP. I'm looking forward to seeing more interface-related content."

"From a technical perspective, the technical support could be improved and the price could be reduced."

"Oracle EPM Cloud solutions have simplified the security model. Nevertheless, it would be better having a more differentiated security model."

"The forecasting of values could be simplified in this solution."

"The solution's reporting and dashboards need improvement."

"I have a problem with Hyperion when I need to log some changes in the budget. It's hard to know who made which changes in the budget."

More Oracle Hyperion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"Excellent value for money."

"The licenses cost approximately $1,000."

"Compared with MSBA, it is quite reasonable."

"The licensing cost for the on-premises version of the solution is too high."

"The solution is affordable."

"Oracle Hyperion's licensing structures are quite expensive for some companies, especially medium-sized companies because of the user-based license."

"Oracle Hyperion is not an inexpensive solution."

"It might be considered relatively costly compared to some alternatives."

"As Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, most businesses prefer to have their own private cloud."

More Oracle Hyperion pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,961 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle Hyperion?

We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Hyperion?

We are going to re-implement the Oracle Hyperion system due to changes in our chart of account process and some other factors. We were analyzing whether to move to a cloud system, EPM Cloud. We hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Hyperion?

We are using Oracle Financials and Oracle Hyperion. Oracle Hyperion is used for budget and MIS reporting, while Financials is used for financial accounting, payables, receivables, and general ledge...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 14% of the time

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Board vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

OneStream XF vs Jedox

Compared 4% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

Oracle HFM vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Cognos vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 10% of the time

SAP Business Planning and Consolidation vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 7% of the time

Board vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Hyperion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jedox

February 2026

Download Jedox product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion

February 2026

Download Oracle Hyperion product report

Also Known As

Jedox EPM

Hyperion

Overview

Integrated Corporate Performance Management software provides reliable data, insights, and guidance to everyone in your company. Jedox delivers it all: Self-service budgeting, planning, and forecasting combined with intuitive analytics and BI dashboards in one integrated software platform. Users across the enterprise in any department from Finance to Sales, HR, and Procurement create integrated plans and reports based on the same data model and business logic. Integrate financial planning and analysis with operational plans and reporting to optimize processes, boost data quality, and slash planning cycles throughout the organization.

Jedox

Oracle Business Analytics Suite.

Oracle

Sample Customers

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

February 2026

Free Report: Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

Find out what your peers are saying about Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,961 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.