Jedox vs Oracle Hyperion comparison

Jedox and Oracle are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Jedox is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.1. Jedox holds a 4.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to Oracle’s 12.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jedox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Jedox

Read 13 Jedox reviews

814 Views
601 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Hyperion

Read 54 Oracle Hyperion reviews

2,742 Views
1,798 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Jedox

Oracle Hyperion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Oracle Hyperion and Jedox are powerful solutions competing in enterprise performance management. Oracle Hyperion holds a competitive edge with its scalability and robust planning capabilities, making it ideal for comprehensive financial processes. Jedox, however, is favored for its flexibility, offering agile reporting solutions.

Features: Oracle Hyperion is known for its robust calculation engine, extensive ERP integration, and scalability, supporting large budget cycles. Jedox provides intuitive dashboarding, easy data integration from various sources, and dynamic reporting, suitable for organizations seeking interactive solutions.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Hyperion needs to enhance its documentation, support responsiveness, and address performance issues with large datasets. Jedox could improve its front-end design, modernize its user interface, and refine its technical support framework.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Hyperion offers on-premises and hybrid cloud options, providing flexibility but facing criticism for inconsistent technical support. Jedox presents public cloud deployment but also has reported issues with support consistency. Customer service for both indicates room for improvement.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Hyperion is a premium choice, suited for large enterprises justifying the cost with extensive feature use, offering significant ROI through efficiency gains. Jedox is more cost-effective, appealing to smaller businesses with scalable needs, and offers flexible licensing for better accessibility and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jedox

Ranking in Business Performance Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Hyperion

Ranking in Business Performance Management

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Jedox is 4.7%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Hyperion is 12.7%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Riyaz Halani

Financial Controller at Zalando SE

Powerful BI tool for analyzing financial performance and stable performance

I would rate the scalability of Jedox a seven out of ten. There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself. So that's where the main improvements lie—making it easy for people to not depend on just technical finance teams. There are almost 50 to 60 users using Jedox in our organization.

Read full review

Mahdi Mohaddes

Junior Financial Analyst at Coveris Inc.

Good tool for data visualization but interface is not very intuitive

I am the one that builds the reports. So, it's the baseline for making any predictions for budgets and something like that. We are an international organization, so it helps us to have consolidated reports and a clearer overview. It certainly supports streamlining across our global operations. The integration of Hyperion into our existing system improved operational efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features."

"The solution is very versatile."

"The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool."

"The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in."

"The system is quite flexible. Based on our requirements, we create different cubes that can help us to do complete planning."

"The customer porting is the most valuable feature."

"The EPM is the most valuable feature."

"We use the tool for performance management and planning."

More Jedox pros

"This solution provides a more structured methodology for doing analysis than a tool like Excel. It creates a central database that keeps all information in one place."

"Oracle Hyperion has helped make things work faster in our company."

"The roll-up potential of the product is very good, meaning we have detailed information and we want it to be summarized, based on geography, based on different product lines, or based on different charts of accounts in the general ledger. It rolls up the information in a very concise way. This makes it easy to understand the overall performance, for it's forecasting aspects, or quarterly reporting, year to year, or month to month reporting."

"We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning."

"Scalability isn't a problem for Hyperion."

"The scalability is good."

"The latest cloud version is more efficient for financial implementations."

"This is a customizable product. Our implementation was designed to fit our needs."

More Oracle Hyperion pros

Cons

"Online pixel-perfect reporting is an aspect that has room for improvement."

"Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it."

"The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end."

"There is not much training for Jedox."

"I think it's the design of the report because the design and the UI for the report is standard and lame. When you see a Jedox report, it doesn't seem like it's from today, because the technology is something from the last decade. The scalability needs improvement."

"There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself."

"From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process."

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

More Jedox cons

"The level of complexity of the implementation is always a challenge."

"Oracle Hyperion's scalability could be improved."

"I found the initial setup to be complex."

"There's something known as a data block that Hyperion generates for each and every transaction. Sometimes it does not generate and we need to identify those issues and fix them manually."

"Hyperion has much room for improvement, especially disaster recovery. You don't have the option to choose the proper disaster recovery method. We have Hyperion and an SQL server on the backend. We have active solutions for the backend database server, which aren't working for our people. They've asked us to remove the high availability to increase application performance."

"From a technical perspective, the technical support could be improved and the price could be reduced."

"The reporting feature in Oracle Hyperion isn't the best. It needs improvement."

"The forecasting of values could be simplified in this solution."

More Oracle Hyperion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"Excellent value for money."

"Compared with MSBA, it is quite reasonable."

"The solution is affordable."

"As Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, most businesses prefer to have their own private cloud."

"Oracle Hyperion's licensing structures are quite expensive for some companies, especially medium-sized companies because of the user-based license."

"We pay for licensing yearly."

"The licensing cost for the on-premises version of the solution is too high."

"It might be considered relatively costly compared to some alternatives."

"To get a full license, which gives you access to most of the different Hyperion programs, it costs $2000 to $2500 a month."

More Oracle Hyperion pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Retailer

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Jedox?

The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jedox?

The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jedox?

There is not much training for Jedox. There was no training available in the beginning at all. I had to reach out to them so they would give us something. I think they're getting better, though. Th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Hyperion?

We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Hyperion?

The most important aspect for improvement is the time efficiency when handling large databases. When the database consists of several million records, the software can be slow. However, the perform...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Hyperion?

We use Oracle Hyperion for ad hoc querying and connection with multidimensional databases. It is very easy to use for combining dimensions of the database such as time, geography, and product dimen...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 36% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox

Compared 23% of the time

Tableau vs Jedox

Compared 12% of the time

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 6% of the time

Planful vs Jedox

Compared 4% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

IBM Cognos vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 20% of the time

Tableau vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle HFM vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 14% of the time

Anaplan vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 10% of the time

OneStream XF vs Oracle Hyperion

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle Hyperion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jedox

January 2025

Download Jedox product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Hyperion

January 2025

Download Oracle Hyperion product report

Also Known As

Jedox EPM

Hyperion

Learn More

Jedox

Oracle

Overview

Integrated Corporate Performance Management software provides reliable data, insights, and guidance to everyone in your company. Jedox delivers it all: Self-service budgeting, planning, and forecasting combined with intuitive analytics and BI dashboards in one integrated software platform. Users across the enterprise in any department from Finance to Sales, HR, and Procurement create integrated plans and reports based on the same data model and business logic. Integrate financial planning and analysis with operational plans and reporting to optimize processes, boost data quality, and slash planning cycles throughout the organization.

Oracle Business Analytics Suite.

Sample Customers

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

ITNL, Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., Barco N.V., SITA, McGregor Fashion Group B.V., PCCW Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

January 2025

Free Report: Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion

Find out what your peers are saying about Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.