Jedox vs Oracle Hyperion comparison

"The ETL function simplifies many tasks."

"The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in."

"The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool."

"We use the tool for performance management and planning."

"The customer porting is the most valuable feature."

"The solution is quick with analysis and calculation. The tool offers high digitalization which helps us to run the controlling department with less number of people. If the software wasn't there, I would need two to three people extra to run the department."

"The EPM is the most valuable feature."

"The solution is very versatile."

"We like the reporting and tracking of financials."

"We can collect data from various sources, which is very useful for budgeting and planning."

"We can integrate with any system and pull data from SAP or SQL Server. We can also design our own role files to establish how we pull the file data and store it in our database."

"The tool's most valuable feature of the solution is flexibility and integration capabilities."

"The accuracy of data gathering and consolidation is very good."

"Oracle Hyperion is an engine allowing you to build whatever you want on it."

"The tool is very scalable and powerful. It helps us with financial reporting and performance reporting. It is a very good tool for consolidation and budgeting. We are dependent on it for reporting."

"This product is very scalable and provides high ROI."

"I think it's the design of the report because the design and the UI for the report is standard and lame. When you see a Jedox report, it doesn't seem like it's from today, because the technology is something from the last decade. The scalability needs improvement."

"Online pixel-perfect reporting is an aspect that has room for improvement."

"The solution needs to improve its support. The visualization in Microsoft BI is more modern and comfortable than Jedox's. I would expect something similar with the solution."

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

"I don't find it particularly user-friendly."

"From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process."

"The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end."

"Jedox should improve the design and server issues."

"The analytical side of the product could be better and needs to be improved."

"I have a problem with Hyperion when I need to log some changes in the budget. It's hard to know who made which changes in the budget."

"They could support machine learning algorithms for the product."

"It is challenging to do reporting on Oracle Hyperion if you're not an expert."

"What I like is to have everything on one platform and not in different modules like Oracle Hyperion."

"The initial setup of Oracle Hyperion is very difficult."

"Sometimes Oracle Hyperion is slow when there are a lot of users using it. However, we can have up to approximately 300 users using it."

"The most important aspect for improvement is the time efficiency when handling large databases."

"Excellent value for money."

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"To get a full license, which gives you access to most of the different Hyperion programs, it costs $2000 to $2500 a month."

"As Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, most businesses prefer to have their own private cloud."

"The licenses cost approximately $1,000."

"We pay for licensing yearly."

"Oracle Hyperion is not an inexpensive solution."

"It might be considered relatively costly compared to some alternatives."

"The licensing cost for the on-premises version of the solution is too high."

"Compared with MSBA, it is quite reasonable."