Top 10 Oracle Hyperion Alternatives

3.9 out of 5

56 reviews
86% willing to recommend

984 followers

Top Oracle Hyperion Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle Hyperion based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Anaplan, Domo, and IBM Planning Analytics. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Oracle Hyperion surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive financial management solutions with advanced budgeting, forecasting, reporting capabilities, seamless integration, and user-friendly interfaces, empowering businesses to make informed decisions efficiently.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Anaplan

4.0 out of 5

Anaplan

4.0 out of 5

Oracle Hyperion offers robust enterprise performance management, ideal for scalability and security. In comparison, Anaplan excels in flexibility and integration for collaborative modeling. Oracle Hyperion faces setup complexity, while Anaplan requires high costs but offers intuitive interfaces and real-time data updates.

Download Anaplan vs. Oracle Hyperion Report

Pricing

Oracle Hyperion involves a complex setup process, potentially leading to higher initial costs, while Anaplan offers a streamlined setup with potentially lower initial costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Hyperion involves a complex setup process, potentially leading to higher initial costs, while Anaplan offers a streamlined setup with potentially lower initial costs.

Domo

3.9 out of 5

Domo

3.9 out of 5

Domo facilitates ease of use with versatile data management and visualization tools, appealing to non-tech users. In comparison, Oracle Hyperion provides robust financial analytics suited for enterprises focused on financial reporting, highlighting structured data handling and integration with financial systems.

Download Domo vs. Oracle Hyperion Report

Pricing

Domo offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Oracle Hyperion involves higher setup expenses due to its complex implementation process. These differences highlight Domo's affordability against Oracle Hyperion's robust enterprise-level capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Planning Analytics

4.2 out of 5

IBM Planning Analytics

4.2 out of 5

IBM Planning Analytics offers efficient deployment and integration, making it ideal for cost-conscious businesses seeking quick insights. In comparison, Oracle Hyperion provides advanced features suitable for complex enterprises, justifying higher initial investments with comprehensive analytics for strategic financial management.

Download IBM Planning Analytics vs. Oracle Hyperion Report

Pricing

Our licensing cost is approximately $50,000.00 per year.

The license of this solution is paid annually. Most of my customers choose a license that includes support.

View comparison

Pricing

Our licensing cost is approximately $50,000.00 per year.

The license of this solution is paid annually. Most of my customers choose a license that includes support.

Workiva Wdesk

3.5 out of 5

Workiva Wdesk

3.5 out of 5

Oracle Hyperion provides complex financial analytics, making it ideal for large enterprises. In comparison, Workiva Wdesk excels with real-time cloud collaboration and quick deployment, appealing to organizations seeking efficient solutions. Hyperion's extensive features cater to comprehensive needs; Workiva offers cost-effective, user-friendly options.

Download Oracle Hyperion vs. Workiva Wdesk Report

Pricing

Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive.

View comparison

Pricing

Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive.

Board

4.3 out of 5

Board

4.3 out of 5

Board excels in pricing and support, emphasizing intuitive configuration and data visualization for ease of use. In comparison, Oracle Hyperion's robust financial management and advanced analytics cater to enterprises with complex needs, offering substantial long-term ROI despite higher initial costs and complex deployment.

Download Board vs. Oracle Hyperion Report

Pricing

Board has lower setup costs compared to Oracle Hyperion, which makes it a cost-effective option for businesses seeking initial savings. In contrast, Oracle Hyperion requires a larger initial investment, potentially offering a more extensive feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

Jedox

4.0 out of 5

Jedox

4.0 out of 5

Oracle Hyperion offers scalability and advanced calculation functions, suitable for large-scale planning. In comparison, Jedox enables dynamic reporting with Excel integration, ideal for agile data visualization and ease of use. Oracle Hyperion's infrastructure complexity contrasts with Jedox's adaptable deployment options.

Download Jedox vs. Oracle Hyperion Report

Pricing

Oracle Hyperion involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas Jedox offers a lower setup fee. The considerable difference in setup costs might influence companies to opt for Jedox for budget-friendly implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

CCH Tagetik

3.9 out of 5

CCH Tagetik

3.9 out of 5

Oracle Hyperion stands out for enterprise-level performance with extensive financial features, while CCH Tagetik attracts with adaptability and ease of use. In comparison, CCH Tagetik's streamlined deployment and cost-effectiveness appeal to organizations seeking quick ROI and seamless integration.

Download CCH Tagetik vs. Oracle Hyperion Report

Pricing

Oracle Hyperion's setup cost is higher, making it a significant investment, while CCH Tagetik offers a more cost-effective setup option, appealing to those conscious of budget constraints.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Hyperion's setup cost is higher, making it a significant investment, while CCH Tagetik offers a more cost-effective setup option, appealing to those conscious of budget constraints.

Adaptive Insights

4.2 out of 5

Adaptive Insights

4.2 out of 5

Adaptive Insights offers a cloud-based solution with seamless integration and efficient planning. In comparison, Oracle Hyperion provides robust consolidation and reporting for large enterprises, appealing to buyers needing comprehensive features despite its complex deployment and higher costs.

Download Adaptive Insights vs. Oracle Hyperion Report

Pricing

Adaptive Insights has a lower setup cost, offering quick deployment, whereas Oracle Hyperion requires a higher investment, reflecting its extensive features.

View comparison

Pricing

Adaptive Insights has a lower setup cost, offering quick deployment, whereas Oracle Hyperion requires a higher investment, reflecting its extensive features.

OneStream XF

5.0 out of 5

OneStream XF

5.0 out of 5

Oracle Hyperion excels in extensive reporting and analytics, ideal for users within the Oracle ecosystem. In comparison, OneStream XF offers a unified platform that ensures streamlined financial processes and flexibility. Oracle's complexity contrasts with OneStream's straightforward deployment and cost-effective approach.

Download OneStream XF vs. Oracle Hyperion Report

Pricing

They price it by the user. Before discounting, it is 2,500 or something like that.

The licensing is expensive.

View comparison

Pricing

They price it by the user. Before discounting, it is 2,500 or something like that.

The licensing is expensive.

Software AG ARIS Process Mining

4.4 out of 5

Software AG ARIS Process Mining

4.4 out of 5

Oracle Hyperion is preferred for cost-efficient financial management solutions. In comparison, ARIS Process Mining is valued for its advanced real-time analytics. Oracle promises financial ROI, whereas ARIS simplifies deployment and offers quick operational returns. Oracle ensures financial oversight; ARIS enhances process efficiency.

Download Oracle Hyperion vs. Software AG ARIS Process Mining Report

Pricing

We pay for a license to use this solution.

The pricing is based on licenses.

View comparison

Pricing

We pay for a license to use this solution.

The pricing is based on licenses.