SAS Activity-Based Management and Oracle Hyperion compete in financial analysis and planning. Oracle Hyperion has a competitive edge due to its robust feature set, despite SAS's advantages in pricing and support.
Features: SAS Activity-Based Management is known for detailed cost tracking, process-based optimization, and activity-based costing to efficiently analyze resource allocation. Oracle Hyperion provides advanced financial consolidation, rich data integration, and an integrated approach to broader financial processes.
Room for Improvement: SAS Activity-Based Management could improve in scalability, reporting features, and data visualization. Oracle Hyperion could enhance ease of use, streamline training requirements, and reduce implementation complexity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Activity-Based Management offers swift implementation and integrates easily into existing workflows, with strong customer service support. Oracle Hyperion's deployment is more complex but is supported by extensive documentation and a broad support network.
Pricing and ROI: SAS Activity-Based Management presents lower setup costs and offers significant ROI through its affordability and precision in cost analysis. Oracle Hyperion, despite its higher initial costs, provides substantial ROI with its comprehensive features in financial management.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
