Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Zadara comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Amazon EFS support is well-rated, with users finding documentation helpful and support responsive, though some find AWS support costly.
No sentiment score available
Zadara's customer service is praised for 24/7 responsiveness, proactive monitoring, technical expertise, and cost-effective quality assistance, ensuring high satisfaction.
We lack adequate response times and a 24/7 service level agreement.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.4
Amazon EFS needs improved user-friendliness, Windows integration, stability, performance, cost transparency, connectivity, and remote access similar to OneDrive.
Sentiment score
5.9
Zadara needs proactive updates, better OS integration, improved analytics, lower costs, and added AI capabilities for enhanced service.
Adding AI capabilities could enhance the offering as well.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Amazon EFS is praised for its rapid, scalable performance, supporting varied business sizes, despite minor issues with dynamic scaling.
Sentiment score
8.5
Zadara provides scalable, flexible storage with usage-based payments, supporting diverse workloads and aligning with evolving customer needs for growth.
Zadara is a fully-fledged platform, and our customers are happy with its use.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Amazon EFS is generally praised for stability and performance, though some users report occasional glitches and less stability.
Sentiment score
5.8
Zadara provides high availability with effective failover, real-time monitoring, and global support, though stability could further improve.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.9
Amazon EFS offers scalable, cost-effective, seamless storage with extensive AWS integration, supporting multiple servers and applications requiring consistent file access.
Sentiment score
7.5
Zadara provides cost-effective, scalable, and reliable cloud integration with low latency, high performance, and versatile storage solutions.
The most valuable feature is its storage management capability.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.0
Zadara offers a cost-effective pay-per-use model with transparent pricing, flexibility, and multi-year discounts, though regional variance exists.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...
Ranking in File and Object Storage
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Storage (6th)
Zadara
Ranking in File and Object Storage
20th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (32nd), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (16th), Compute Service (11th), Public Cloud Storage Services (16th)
 

Featured Reviews

Shailesh Tripathi - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for storing details of projects and has an easy configuration
I will recommend the product to others. We are partners. Our clients moved from on-premise setup to the cloud. We suggested AWS to them. We have configured the product based on the best practices. We also monitor the solution for recommendations in the Security Hub. We try to get the data encrypted properly within our repository. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Kirubel Behailu - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing storage management efficiency with user-friendly experience
Our customers are using Zadara for their research and development environments. We provide infrastructure for government projects, but we are often not fully aware of their specific usage.  I typically use it for our infrastructure and offer both Zadara and Microsoft Azure to our customers Zadara…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?
Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...
What do you like most about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?
The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?
The product charges are based on the amount of data stored, with different hot and cold storage costs. Cold storage is inexpensive but slower to access.
What needs improvement with Zadara?
Every time they do a firmware upgrade, it should be nondestructive. Currently, when we do firmware upgrades, it sometimes causes issues and is not as nondisruptive as desired. It would be beneficia...
What is your primary use case for Zadara?
We are using Zadara for our non-critical storage needs. We use both their block storage and also their NAS capabilities.
What advice do you have for others considering Zadara?
Within certain constraints, users should use it only for their nonproduction workloads. Alternatively, for production, it should only be for noncritical workloads. I'd rate the solution seven out o...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend
Time, Inc. A&E Network, The Washington Post, News UK, McGraw Hill, Gilt, Toshiba, Deloitte, VMware
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Zadara and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.