Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

VMware vSAN vs Zadara comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
4.8
Organizations found VMware vSAN impacts varied, with cost savings and productivity gains, but faced challenges in precise financial measurement.
Sentiment score
8.1
Transitioning to Zadara offers cost savings and flexibility, though regional pricing can be higher than AWS.
The cost is not cheaper compared to AWS, and we have not seen the expected return on investment.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.6
VMware vSAN support is generally praised for responsiveness and competence, though users note variability in response times and delays.
Sentiment score
8.1
Zadara's customer service is praised for 24/7 responsiveness, proactive monitoring, technical expertise, and cost-effective quality assistance, ensuring high satisfaction.
I am not satisfied with VMware support, particularly with the reaction times, SLAs, and those kinds of issues.
We lack adequate response times and a 24/7 service level agreement.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.5
VMware vSAN offers flexible scaling, enabling efficient infrastructure expansion, appreciated for seamless storage and performance boost across workloads.
Sentiment score
8.0
Zadara provides scalable, flexible storage with usage-based payments, supporting diverse workloads and aligning with evolving customer needs for growth.
Zadara is a fully-fledged platform, and our customers are happy with its use.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
5.7
VMware vSAN is generally stable with high performance, though hardware compatibility and minor glitches are occasionally reported.
Sentiment score
7.4
Zadara provides high availability with effective failover, real-time monitoring, and global support, though stability could further improve.
 

Room For Improvement

VMware vSAN requires improvements in management, compatibility, cost, monitoring, and stability, with challenges in user interface and integration.
Zadara needs proactive updates, better OS integration, improved analytics, lower costs, and added AI capabilities for enhanced service.
Maybe incorporation of automation to build clusters in a more automated way would be beneficial.
Adding AI capabilities could enhance the offering as well.
 

Setup Cost

VMware vSAN offers enterprise storage features with potential cost savings but can be costly for smaller businesses.
Zadara offers a cost-effective pay-per-use model with transparent pricing, flexibility, and multi-year discounts, though regional variance exists.
The pricing is considered expensive.
 

Valuable Features

VMware vSAN offers high performance, scalability, cost-efficiency, easy deployment, and integration, providing flexible storage for evolving business needs.
Zadara provides cost-effective, scalable, and reliable cloud integration with low latency, high performance, and versatile storage solutions.
A one-stack solution from one vendor is the main benefit here.
The most valuable feature is its storage management capability.
 

Categories and Ranking

VMware vSAN
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
230
Ranking in other categories
HCI (2nd)
Zadara
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (33rd), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (17th), Compute Service (11th), Public Cloud Storage Services (15th), File and Object Storage (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Storage Solutions solutions, they serve different purposes. VMware vSAN is designed for HCI and holds a mindshare of 15.9%, down 18.5% compared to last year.
Zadara, on the other hand, focuses on All-Flash Storage, holds 0.2% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.
HCI
All-Flash Storage
 

Featured Reviews

Yves Sandfort - PeerSpot reviewer
Gives us a lot of advantages when we need to expand resources
Stability can be improved. Adding all these new features is nice, but we are now at the level where most of the features you need in production are there. The stability is not from a day-to-day operations perspective, but more from a supportability perspective, because currently some of the support scenarios require you to completely evacuate hosts or the complete cluster. That sometimes can be a stretch. This would clearly be an improvement if the support teams were given additional tools to make that easier. Upgradability could be a bit easier sometimes. We are now where vSAN can be updated without ESXi, but there is still enough dependency. So that would be good if that actually would be uncoupled even more. Dashboards are there, and we use vROps as well. So, we have all the beauty of capacity planning and everything over there. That's not really something where we need a lot of other things.
Kirubel Behailu - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing storage management efficiency with user-friendly experience
Our customers are using Zadara for their research and development environments. We provide infrastructure for government projects, but we are often not fully aware of their specific usage.  I typically use it for our infrastructure and offer both Zadara and Microsoft Azure to our customers Zadara…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which HCI solutions are best for your needs.
839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
53%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Computer Software Company
22%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What Is The Biggest Difference Between vSAN And VxRail?
While both run on the vSAN technology from VMware, vSAN needs to be deployed on vSAN ready nodes while VxRail is an engineered system. The choice to choose which technology depends on two major fac...
Which would you choose - Nutanix Acropolis AOS or VMware vSAN?
We found the reduced power consumption with Nutanix Acropolis AOS a very attractive feature. We also like the interface that allows you to talk directly to your VM from the present software. We fou...
How does HPE Simplivity compare with VMware vSAN?
HPE SimpliVity is a hyper-converged infrastructure solution that is primarily geared to mid-sized companies. We researched VMware vSAN but found HPE was a better option for us. HPE SimpliVity has ...
What needs improvement with Zadara?
There is room for improvement in pricing as it is currently quite expensive. Adding AI capabilities could enhance the offering as well.
What is your primary use case for Zadara?
Our customers are using Zadara for their research and development environments. We provide infrastructure for government projects, but we are often not fully aware of their specific usage. I typica...
What advice do you have for others considering Zadara?
If companies have the budget, I recommend Zadara for small business classes due to its robust performance and user-friendliness. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

vSAN
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Read Some Case Studies At Home Cloud CaribCINgroupDiscovery Check out the Rest of our Customer Stories Here
Time, Inc. A&E Network, The Washington Post, News UK, McGraw Hill, Gilt, Toshiba, Deloitte, VMware
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware vSAN vs. Zadara and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.