Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon S3 vs Zadara comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Amazon S3 support is knowledgeable and professional, though some users desire quicker responses and reduced costs.
No sentiment score available
Zadara's customer service is praised for 24/7 responsiveness, proactive monitoring, technical expertise, and cost-effective quality assistance, ensuring high satisfaction.
We lack adequate response times and a 24/7 service level agreement.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.8
Amazon S3 requires better management, security, cost transparency, UI improvements, faster access, scalability, reduced latency, and enhanced support.
Sentiment score
5.9
Zadara needs proactive updates, better OS integration, improved analytics, lower costs, and added AI capabilities for enhanced service.
Adding AI capabilities could enhance the offering as well.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Amazon S3 is valued for its scalable, secure, and efficient storage solutions, suitable for businesses of all sizes and needs.
Sentiment score
8.5
Zadara provides scalable, flexible storage with usage-based payments, supporting diverse workloads and aligning with evolving customer needs for growth.
Zadara is a fully-fledged platform, and our customers are happy with its use.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.8
Amazon S3 offers cost-effective, flexible pay-as-you-go storage with extra costs for data retrieval and transfers across regions.
Sentiment score
7.0
Zadara offers a cost-effective pay-per-use model with transparent pricing, flexibility, and multi-year discounts, though regional variance exists.
The pricing is considered expensive.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Amazon S3 is highly reliable, secure, and efficient with minimal maintenance, nearly 100% availability, and rare upload speed issues.
Sentiment score
5.8
Zadara provides high availability with effective failover, real-time monitoring, and global support, though stability could further improve.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Amazon S3 offers scalable, secure, cost-effective storage with features like versioning, lifecycle policies, multi-zone replication, and AWS integration.
Sentiment score
7.5
Zadara provides cost-effective, scalable, and reliable cloud integration with low latency, high performance, and versatile storage solutions.
The most valuable feature is its storage management capability.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zadara
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (32nd), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (16th), Compute Service (11th), File and Object Storage (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 is 11.3%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zadara is 1.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

HenryAragon - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers different tiers, enable encryption but there's a lot of complexity
The best thing about S3 is the security. I can enable encryption at rest using a KMS server, a key management server. Key management servers encrypt data, and you need the key to decrypt it. Without the key, you can't access the data. Amazon allows you to use your own servers or theirs. They offer Amazon encryption, which you decide on when you create the bucket. The bucket also has all the other features like versioning. We can do versioning and life cycles. The biggest plus for me as a storage admin is the different tiers: standard, infrequent access, Glacier, and Glacier Deep Archive. The differences between these tiers are cost and data retrieval speed. Standard tier data is considered "hot," meaning it's accessible anytime, but it's expensive. If you want to archive data you won't need often, or if you have ample time to retrieve a backup, the most cost-effective option is Glacier Deep Archive. It's very cheap, but the disadvantage is that when you request data, it takes up to 24 hours to become accessible. There are no limitations on how much you can store, but the biggest limitation is that you cannot use Glacier Deep Archive from the console. You can't go into the AWS console and copy something directly into Deep Glacier, but you can do it from the command line. If you have programmatic access, there's a command to put data directly into Glacier Deep Archive. We don't use anything AI on AWS right now. The AI stuff isn't really too useful for us yet. We're just playing around with Copilot from Microsoft, which is more on the Azure side. We haven't leveraged any AWS AI stuff yet. We've basically just been playing around with Amazon Bedrock, but haven't done anything in production with it.
Kirubel Behailu - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing storage management efficiency with user-friendly experience
Our customers are using Zadara for their research and development environments. We provide infrastructure for government projects, but we are often not fully aware of their specific usage.  I typically use it for our infrastructure and offer both Zadara and Microsoft Azure to our customers Zadara…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
75%
Computer Software Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Manufacturing Company
2%
Computer Software Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon S3?
We can easily connect to the AWS resources.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon S3?
The licensing model is complex. If you need your backup data available at all times, but don't access it frequently, there are better options. You could go with S3, but other vendors offer the same...
What needs improvement with Amazon S3?
There's a lot of complexity, but that's unavoidable because it needs to be versatile. You have to be able to get the data in many different ways. For example, if you need to give just one file to s...
What needs improvement with Zadara?
Every time they do a firmware upgrade, it should be nondestructive. Currently, when we do firmware upgrades, it sometimes causes issues and is not as nondisruptive as desired. It would be beneficia...
What is your primary use case for Zadara?
We are using Zadara for our non-critical storage needs. We use both their block storage and also their NAS capabilities.
What advice do you have for others considering Zadara?
Within certain constraints, users should use it only for their nonproduction workloads. Alternatively, for production, it should only be for noncritical workloads. I'd rate the solution seven out o...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

S3, Simple Storage Service
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
Time, Inc. A&E Network, The Washington Post, News UK, McGraw Hill, Gilt, Toshiba, Deloitte, VMware
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. Zadara and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.