Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Amazon S3 support is knowledgeable and professional, though some users desire quicker responses and reduced costs.
Sentiment score
5.2
Microsoft Azure File Storage support varies in responsiveness and quality, influenced by customer status, location, and type of partnership.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.8
Amazon S3 requires better management, security, cost transparency, UI improvements, faster access, scalability, reduced latency, and enhanced support.
Sentiment score
4.3
Microsoft Azure File Storage needs enhanced ease of use, pricing clarity, integrations, security features, and improved user experience.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Amazon S3 is valued for its scalable, secure, and efficient storage solutions, suitable for businesses of all sizes and needs.
Sentiment score
8.3
Microsoft Azure File Storage is scalable and adaptable for various organization sizes, efficiently handling user needs with dynamic cloud capabilities.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.8
Amazon S3 offers cost-effective, flexible pay-as-you-go storage with extra costs for data retrieval and transfers across regions.
No sentiment score available
Microsoft Azure File Storage pricing is variable and less transparent, with potentially higher costs and various additional fees for support and licensing.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Amazon S3 is highly reliable, secure, and efficient with minimal maintenance, nearly 100% availability, and rare upload speed issues.
No sentiment score available
Microsoft Azure File Storage is praised for stability and reliability, with users reporting minimal issues and high stability ratings.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Amazon S3 offers scalable, secure, cost-effective storage with features like versioning, lifecycle policies, multi-zone replication, and AWS integration.
Sentiment score
8.5
Microsoft Azure File Storage offers flexible, secure, and cost-effective file storage with high availability, seamless integration, and convenient file transfer capabilities.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure File Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 is 11.3%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 12.9%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

HenryAragon - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers different tiers, enable encryption but there's a lot of complexity
The best thing about S3 is the security. I can enable encryption at rest using a KMS server, a key management server. Key management servers encrypt data, and you need the key to decrypt it. Without the key, you can't access the data. Amazon allows you to use your own servers or theirs. They offer Amazon encryption, which you decide on when you create the bucket. The bucket also has all the other features like versioning. We can do versioning and life cycles. The biggest plus for me as a storage admin is the different tiers: standard, infrequent access, Glacier, and Glacier Deep Archive. The differences between these tiers are cost and data retrieval speed. Standard tier data is considered "hot," meaning it's accessible anytime, but it's expensive. If you want to archive data you won't need often, or if you have ample time to retrieve a backup, the most cost-effective option is Glacier Deep Archive. It's very cheap, but the disadvantage is that when you request data, it takes up to 24 hours to become accessible. There are no limitations on how much you can store, but the biggest limitation is that you cannot use Glacier Deep Archive from the console. You can't go into the AWS console and copy something directly into Deep Glacier, but you can do it from the command line. If you have programmatic access, there's a command to put data directly into Glacier Deep Archive. We don't use anything AI on AWS right now. The AI stuff isn't really too useful for us yet. We're just playing around with Copilot from Microsoft, which is more on the Azure side. We haven't leveraged any AWS AI stuff yet. We've basically just been playing around with Amazon Bedrock, but haven't done anything in production with it.
Pmurki@Micron.Com Praveen - PeerSpot reviewer
Setup takes minimal efforts and good product to keep files for our ETL process
We use it for ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes. We get files from different tools related to our micro-processing, copy them into Azure File Storage, and then consume them for parsing and loading It's good overall. We just use Azure File Storage as a way to keep files for our ETL process.…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
75%
Computer Software Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Manufacturing Company
2%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon S3?
We can easily connect to the AWS resources.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon S3?
The licensing model is complex. If you need your backup data available at all times, but don't access it frequently, there are better options. You could go with S3, but other vendors offer the same...
What needs improvement with Amazon S3?
There's a lot of complexity, but that's unavoidable because it needs to be versatile. You have to be able to get the data in many different ways. For example, if you need to give just one file to s...
Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?
Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?
As for the current licensing and payment structure, it's almost pay-as-you-go. Monthly is okay. But maybe we'll get a better price if we have a long-term contract and pay monthly.
 

Also Known As

S3, Simple Storage Service
MS Azure File Storage
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
Talon, Camden
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.