Amazon S3 and Oracle Cloud Object Storage are leading contenders in cloud storage services. Amazon S3 generally excels in support and pricing, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage excels in features, making it worth the higher cost for some users.
Features: Amazon S3 is known for its scalability, integration with other AWS services, and cost-effectiveness. Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers comprehensive data management, high security, and robust features.
Room for Improvement: Amazon S3 could benefit from more intuitive administrative tools, enhanced cost management features, and better documentation. Oracle Cloud Object Storage users suggest improvements in documentation, a smoother learning curve, and better usability for complex tasks.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon S3 is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers reliable but slightly more complex deployment, countered by superior customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 is considered more cost-effective, with clear setup costs and good ROI. Oracle Cloud Object Storage has higher upfront costs but justifies them with extensive features and satisfactory ROI.
Moving infrequently accessed data to cheaper classes like Glacier is beneficial for long-term storage at a lower cost.
An engineer is assigned based on the severity of the issue.
Data placed in an S3 bucket is replicated across availability zones in a region, ensuring scalability and availability.
Amazon S3's automatic scaling has benefited me, as I don't need to plan storage requirements.
Amazon S3 is easily scalable and performs better compared to other cloud storage solutions.
Amazon S3 is highly stable.
Transitioning between S3 storage classes, like moving data from the standard class to Glacier or Glacier Deep Archive, has been challenging.
The practice of protecting data could be more streamlined or mandatory.
An improvement could be associating the naming with personal accounts, allowing more familiar or desired names without conflicting with global conventions.
In terms of security, I struggled with setting permissions and access control initially.
I've used the free tier and haven't been charged yet.
S3 offers multiple classes, allowing you to move data to cheaper classes for cost savings.
It is somewhat justified due to the benefits, but there is room for reconsideration.
I appreciate its capability to create static websites and integrate with services like CloudFront, EC2, and DynamoDB.
Its stability and scalability are also impressive, as it allows for increased storage space according to demand.
Amazon S3 is easily scalable and provides fantastic performance, especially in comparison to other cloud solutions like OCI and Azure.
Amazon Simple Storage Service is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
Amazon S3 has a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the same highly scalable, reliable, fast, inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.
Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.
Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.
Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements
Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.