Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Amazon S3 support is knowledgeable and professional, though some users desire quicker responses and reduced costs.
Sentiment score
7.5
Oracle Cloud Object Storage's technical support is highly praised for its capability management and responsiveness, receiving a perfect rating.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.8
Amazon S3 requires better management, security, cost transparency, UI improvements, faster access, scalability, reduced latency, and enhanced support.
Sentiment score
4.4
Oracle Cloud needs better security, fewer glitches, customizable tasks, multi-cloud integration, and enhanced performance to improve Object Storage.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Amazon S3 is valued for its scalable, secure, and efficient storage solutions, suitable for businesses of all sizes and needs.
Sentiment score
8.0
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is praised for access control, scalability, reliability, ease of backups, and excellent service despite low current scaling focus.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.8
Amazon S3 offers cost-effective, flexible pay-as-you-go storage with extra costs for data retrieval and transfers across regions.
Sentiment score
5.9
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is seen as costly for disaster recovery, with flexible payment options and potential savings over on-premises solutions.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Amazon S3 is highly reliable, secure, and efficient with minimal maintenance, nearly 100% availability, and rare upload speed issues.
Sentiment score
8.3
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 8/10 for stability, consistently available and free of major issues or problems.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Amazon S3 offers scalable, secure, cost-effective storage with features like versioning, lifecycle policies, multi-zone replication, and AWS integration.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
12th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 is 11.3%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Cloud Object Storage is 4.3%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

HenryAragon - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers different tiers, enable encryption but there's a lot of complexity
The best thing about S3 is the security. I can enable encryption at rest using a KMS server, a key management server. Key management servers encrypt data, and you need the key to decrypt it. Without the key, you can't access the data. Amazon allows you to use your own servers or theirs. They offer Amazon encryption, which you decide on when you create the bucket. The bucket also has all the other features like versioning. We can do versioning and life cycles. The biggest plus for me as a storage admin is the different tiers: standard, infrequent access, Glacier, and Glacier Deep Archive. The differences between these tiers are cost and data retrieval speed. Standard tier data is considered "hot," meaning it's accessible anytime, but it's expensive. If you want to archive data you won't need often, or if you have ample time to retrieve a backup, the most cost-effective option is Glacier Deep Archive. It's very cheap, but the disadvantage is that when you request data, it takes up to 24 hours to become accessible. There are no limitations on how much you can store, but the biggest limitation is that you cannot use Glacier Deep Archive from the console. You can't go into the AWS console and copy something directly into Deep Glacier, but you can do it from the command line. If you have programmatic access, there's a command to put data directly into Glacier Deep Archive. We don't use anything AI on AWS right now. The AI stuff isn't really too useful for us yet. We're just playing around with Copilot from Microsoft, which is more on the Azure side. We haven't leveraged any AWS AI stuff yet. We've basically just been playing around with Amazon Bedrock, but haven't done anything in production with it.
Jonatas Pereira - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for businesses to archive their information
I don't use the tool directly. Based on what my team says, from one to ten, if one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the product's initial setup phase as a nine. A technical person took care of the product's installation phase. The solution is deployed on the private and public clouds. The tool is majorly deployed on a private cloud. I use the cloud services from Microsoft Azure. The solution can be deployed in a period of two years. For deployment in the infrastructure, we had five people who are infrastructure specialists. About twenty people needed development, and the team consisted of analysts and specialists. For infrastructure, there were five people as specialists for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). Though we use too much of Azure, OCI is the biggest product for our company. Azure is managed by a medium number of people. There are five people to take care of the clouds.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
75%
Computer Software Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Manufacturing Company
2%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon S3?
We can easily connect to the AWS resources.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon S3?
The licensing model is complex. If you need your backup data available at all times, but don't access it frequently, there are better options. You could go with S3, but other vendors offer the same...
What needs improvement with Amazon S3?
There's a lot of complexity, but that's unavoidable because it needs to be versatile. You have to be able to get the data in many different ways. For example, if you need to give just one file to s...
What do you like most about Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
Cost-wise, it is not an affordable tool if you allocate space, and try to use it some other day. During the billing cycle, if I use the tool only for a day, I still need to pay you for a month. The...
What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
In my opinion, the tool's performance is very good. If Oracle can improve the tool's performance and make it better, then it would be good. There should be some kind of integration with other platf...
 

Also Known As

S3, Simple Storage Service
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
Brinks
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.