Top 10 Oracle Cloud Object Storage Alternatives

4.3 out of 5

6 reviews
100% willing to recommend

141 followers

Top Oracle Cloud Object Storage Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Google Cloud Storage, and Amazon S3. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Oracle Cloud Object Storage surpasses its competitors by offering unmatched scalability, robust security features, and comprehensive data management capabilities, ensuring seamless data access, high availability, and cost-effective storage solutions for businesses of all sizes.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

4.4 out of 5

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

4.4 out of 5

Oracle Cloud Object Storage excels in pricing and support, offering high scalability and easy integration. In comparison, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP stands out with advanced data management and high availability, justifying higher costs. Choose Oracle for cost savings and NetApp for extensive features and long-term ROI.

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage Report

Pricing

Oracle Cloud Object Storage has low setup costs, making it accessible for budget-conscious businesses. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, however, has higher initial setup costs but offers comprehensive management features beneficial for more extensive deployments.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Cloud Storage

4.4 out of 5

Google Cloud Storage

4.4 out of 5

Google Cloud Storage excels in pricing and ease of use, making it cost-efficient and quick to deploy. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers advanced features and superior customer service, justifying its higher cost for those prioritizing comprehensive data management and security features.

Download Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage Report

Pricing

Google Cloud Storage has lower setup costs, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Cloud Storage has lower setup costs, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage requires a higher initial investment.

Amazon S3

4.4 out of 5

Amazon S3

4.4 out of 5

Amazon S3 offers robust scalability, reliability, and integration with AWS services. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Object Storage provides strong security, efficient data retrieval, and seamless integration with Oracle databases. Amazon S3's competitive pricing attracts many, while Oracle's advanced features justify its higher cost for some.

Download Amazon S3 vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage Report

Pricing

Amazon S3's setup cost is known for being straightforward and cost-effective, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage's setup cost can be more complex and potentially higher due to enterprise-focused pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Object Storage

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Object Storage integrates well with other Microsoft services and excels in ease of use. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers advanced analytics and cost efficiency, which can attract tech buyers seeking superior data management and competitive pricing.

Download Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage provides a competitive price with a more complex setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage provides a competitive price with a more complex setup.

Related categories

Public Cloud Storage Services

Cloud Migration

Cloud Storage