Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

NetApp and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. NetApp is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8, while Oracle is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. NetApp holds a 6.6% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Read 61 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews
  • 3,186 Views
  • 1,867 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Read 4 Oracle Cloud Object Storage reviews
  • 1,199 Views
  • 1,119 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Oracle Cloud Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offer competing cloud storage solutions. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP seems to have the upper hand due to its superior features and deployment ease, despite its higher cost.

Features: Oracle Cloud Object Storage is praised for its scalability, integration with Oracle’s suite, and favorable pricing. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP stands out for its versatile data management, snapshots, and replication capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Cloud Object Storage could enhance data migration processes, real-time analytics features, and integration with third-party tools. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP users suggest improvements in cost transparency, performance monitoring tools, and interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Cloud Object Storage receives positive feedback for its straightforward deployment and reliable support services. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP gets high marks for robust configuration options but may require advanced expertise for setup. Customer service for NetApp is efficient and personalized.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Cloud Object Storage is considered cost-effective with a good ROI. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is more costly but offers significant ROI through its extensive features and robust performance.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.5
Oracle Cloud Object Storage's technical support is highly praised for its capability management and responsiveness, receiving a perfect rating.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.4
Oracle Cloud needs better security, fewer glitches, customizable tasks, multi-cloud integration, and enhanced performance to improve Object Storage.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.0
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is praised for access control, scalability, reliability, ease of backups, and excellent service despite low current scaling focus.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.9
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is seen as costly for disaster recovery, with flexible payment options and potential savings over on-premises solutions.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 8/10 for stability, consistently available and free of major issues or problems.
 

Categories and Ranking

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Storage (1st), Cloud Backup (10th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (1st)
Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
12th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 6.6%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Cloud Object Storage is 4.3%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

Pramod-Talekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution
The tool's most valuable features are the SnapLock and SnapMirror features. If something goes wrong with the data, we can restore it. This isn't a mirror; we store data in different locations. If there's an issue on the primary site, we can retrieve data from the secondary site. Multiprotocol support in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is beneficial because it allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution. This feature eliminates the need to purchase different types of storage.
Read full review
Jonatas Pereira - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for businesses to archive their information
I don't use the tool directly. Based on what my team says, from one to ten, if one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the product's initial setup phase as a nine. A technical person took care of the product's installation phase. The solution is deployed on the private and public clouds. The tool is majorly deployed on a private cloud. I use the cloud services from Microsoft Azure. The solution can be deployed in a period of two years. For deployment in the infrastructure, we had five people who are infrastructure specialists. About twenty people needed development, and the team consisted of analysts and specialists. For infrastructure, there were five people as specialists for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). Though we use too much of Azure, OCI is the biggest product for our company. Azure is managed by a medium number of people. There are five people to take care of the clouds.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
53%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?
So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?
The solution's pricing is reasonable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP should improve its support.
See all answers
What do you like most about Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
Cost-wise, it is not an affordable tool if you allocate space, and try to use it some other day. During the billing cycle, if I use the tool only for a day, I still need to pay you for a month. The...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
In my opinion, the tool's performance is very good. If Oracle can improve the tool's performance and make it better, then it would be good. There should be some kind of integration with other platf...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 13% of the time
Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 13% of the time
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 12% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 10% of the time
Portworx Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Portworx Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 8% of the time
More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors
Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 56% of the time
Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 16% of the time
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 11% of the time
Oracle Database Backup Service vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
Oracle Database Backup Service vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 7% of the time
More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
November 2024
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reportDownload NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report
Buyer's Guide
Public Cloud Storage Services
November 2024
Oracle Cloud Object Storage reportDownload Oracle Cloud Object Storage product report
 

Also Known As

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO
No data available
 

Learn More

NetApp
Oracle
 

Overview

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

 

Sample Customers

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard
Brinks
Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage
October 2024
Free Report: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.