Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Microsoft is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8, while Oracle is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. Microsoft holds a 2.0% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Read 51 Microsoft Azure Object Storage reviews
  • 714 Views
  • 628 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Read 4 Oracle Cloud Object Storage reviews
  • 1,199 Views
  • 1,119 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Microsoft Azure Object Storage and Oracle Cloud Object Storage compete in the cloud data storage category. Oracle Cloud Object Storage has the upper hand due to its extensive features, especially in data management and analytics.

Features: Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers seamless integration with existing Microsoft services, high scalability, and strong security features. Oracle Cloud Object Storage provides comprehensive data management tools, efficient tiered storage, and advanced analytics capabilities. Oracle Cloud tends to have a stronger feature set, particularly in data management and analytics.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure Object Storage could enhance its cost management and provide more detailed performance analytics. Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs improvement in technical documentation and reduction in support response times. Even though both products have improvement areas, the feedback is more critical for Oracle Cloud's documentation and support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Object Storage users report smooth deployment experiences due to comprehensive support and detailed onboarding resources. Oracle Cloud Object Storage users find the deployment process straightforward but occasionally less responsive customer service hampers it. Microsoft Azure is more favorable for deployment with better customer service response.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Object Storage users report reasonable setup costs with good ROI when leveraging existing Microsoft investments. Oracle Cloud Object Storage users note higher initial setup costs justified by superior performance and advanced features, yielding high ROI. Microsoft Azure is seen as cost-effective, while Oracle Cloud offers better long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Azure Object Storage support is praised for premium plans but criticized for slow response times with basic plans.
Sentiment score
7.5
Oracle Cloud Object Storage's technical support is highly praised for its capability management and responsiveness, receiving a perfect rating.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.3
Microsoft Azure Object Storage needs performance, stability, cost efficiency improvements, better integration, and enhanced support and UI for users.
Sentiment score
4.4
Oracle Cloud needs better security, fewer glitches, customizable tasks, multi-cloud integration, and enhanced performance to improve Object Storage.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is praised for its scalability, efficiently supporting substantial workloads and growing user demands.
Sentiment score
8.0
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is praised for access control, scalability, reliability, ease of backups, and excellent service despite low current scaling focus.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
8.3
Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers variable pricing, higher costs for intensive use, with flexible options often seen as expensive.
Sentiment score
5.9
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is seen as costly for disaster recovery, with flexible payment options and potential savings over on-premises solutions.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is stable, though occasional outages and external factors can impact stability, with varied customer ratings.
Sentiment score
8.3
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 8/10 for stability, consistently available and free of major issues or problems.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers scalability, flexibility, security, ease of use, and performance, with seamless integration and compliance certifications.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
12th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is 2.0%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Cloud Object Storage is 4.3%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

DanBryant - PeerSpot reviewer
Good SLAs and better suited for large files like videos and anything in the multi-gigabyte range
Support's not great, but Microsoft products are much more industrial strength and enterprise ready than any other services out there. That's why we use them and learn how to use them, even when they change things without much advanced notice. We proactively educate ourselves on how to use it once it's changed. I don't pay for premium support. But at a basic level, Microsoft products can be pretty aggravating to work with. I prefer not to rate it. I don't think a number would accurately describe the experience. We still use it, and it's still valuable. But the experience with Microsoft products, from storage to Teams and everything else, can be quite aggravating.
Read full review
Jonatas Pereira - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for businesses to archive their information
I don't use the tool directly. Based on what my team says, from one to ten, if one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the product's initial setup phase as a nine. A technical person took care of the product's installation phase. The solution is deployed on the private and public clouds. The tool is majorly deployed on a private cloud. I use the cloud services from Microsoft Azure. The solution can be deployed in a period of two years. For deployment in the infrastructure, we had five people who are infrastructure specialists. About twenty people needed development, and the team consisted of analysts and specialists. For infrastructure, there were five people as specialists for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). Though we use too much of Azure, OCI is the biggest product for our company. Azure is managed by a medium number of people. There are five people to take care of the clouds.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Retailer
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The layout of Microsoft is professional.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The pricing is higher than CNC. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the pricing as six to seven.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The deployment process needs improvement, and it requires a lot of expertise to use and to utilize it.
See all answers
What do you like most about Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
Cost-wise, it is not an affordable tool if you allocate space, and try to use it some other day. During the billing cycle, if I use the tool only for a day, I still need to pay you for a month. The...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
In my opinion, the tool's performance is very good. If Oracle can improve the tool's performance and make it better, then it would be good. There should be some kind of integration with other platf...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage Logo
Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Compared 30% of the time
Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage Logo
Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Compared 21% of the time
More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Competitors
Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 56% of the time
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 11% of the time
Oracle Database Backup Service vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
Oracle Database Backup Service vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 7% of the time
Google Cloud Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
Google Cloud Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 6% of the time
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 4% of the time
More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Object Storage
November 2024
Microsoft Azure Object Storage reportDownload Microsoft Azure Object Storage product report
Buyer's Guide
Public Cloud Storage Services
November 2024
Oracle Cloud Object Storage reportDownload Oracle Cloud Object Storage product report
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
No data available
 

Learn More

Microsoft
Oracle
 

Overview

REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud

  • Store infrequently accessed data in a low-cost cool storage tier
  • Store frequently accessed application data in a hot storage tier
  • Stream video, audio, and other media to web, mobile, or desktop applications
  • Power big data analytics
  • Access your data more securely, both over the wire and at rest

Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

 

Sample Customers

Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
Brinks
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage
October 2024
Free Report: Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.