Top 10 Microsoft Azure Object Storage Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

51 reviews
87% willing to recommend

162 followers

Top Microsoft Azure Object Storage Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Azure Object Storage based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, and Azure NetApp Files. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Microsoft Azure Object Storage surpasses its competitors by offering scalable cloud storage with seamless data access, advanced security features, robust data redundancy, and integration with powerful analytics, enhancing efficiency and reliability for developers and enterprises.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Amazon S3 Glacier

4.3 out of 5

Amazon S3 Glacier

4.3 out of 5

Amazon S3 Glacier offers reliable cold storage with low retrieval times and cost efficiency. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Object Storage provides extensive integration options and enhanced data management features. Amazon S3 Glacier's straightforward setup is easier, while Azure Object Storage's flexibility makes it valuable for long-term projects.

Download Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage Report

Pricing

Amazon S3 Glacier has a low initial setup cost, whereas Microsoft Azure Object Storage tends to have a higher setup cost. Amazon S3 Glacier is cost-effective for long-term storage, while Microsoft Azure offers more scalability options.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon S3

4.4 out of 5

Amazon S3

4.4 out of 5

Amazon S3 excels with its scalability, reliability, and security, making it suitable for extensive storage needs. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers advanced analytics, integrating well with Microsoft services. Amazon S3 could enhance cost predictability, while Azure simplifies pricing.

Download Amazon S3 vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage Report

Pricing

Amazon S3 setup cost is highly affordable, while Microsoft Azure Object Storage requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon S3 setup cost is highly affordable, while Microsoft Azure Object Storage requires a higher initial investment.

Azure NetApp Files

4.0 out of 5

Azure NetApp Files

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers easy scalability and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Azure NetApp Files has higher performance and seamless on-premise integration. Azure NetApp Files requires improved cost transparency, while Microsoft Azure Object Storage could benefit from faster data retrieval and more intuitive management tools.

Download Azure NetApp Files vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage has a relatively low setup cost compared to Azure NetApp Files, which entails a higher initial investment for implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage has a relatively low setup cost compared to Azure NetApp Files, which entails a higher initial investment for implementation.

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)

4.5 out of 5

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)

4.5 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers scalability and seamless Microsoft services integration. In comparison, Nutanix Unified Storage provides robust data management and multi-protocol support. Tech buyers might choose Microsoft Azure Object Storage for its extensive integration, while preferring Nutanix Unified Storage for its intuitive management and operational efficiency.

Download Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage has zero setup costs, whereas Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) requires a significant initial investment. This difference highlights Azure's cost-effective startup compared to NUS.

View comparison

Pricing

Wasabi

4.1 out of 5

Wasabi

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Object Storage is known for high scalability and strong security with seamless Microsoft integration, making it suitable for diverse environments. In comparison, Wasabi excels in high performance and affordability, making it appealing for cost-conscious buyers. Both have unique strengths fitting different tech needs.

Download Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Wasabi Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage has a higher setup cost, while Wasabi offers a lower setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage has a higher setup cost, while Wasabi offers a lower setup cost.

Zadara

4.4 out of 5

Zadara

4.4 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers extensive integration and robust security. In comparison, Zadara excels in high performance and customizable storage. Azure’s pricing is complex but offers extensive services, while Zadara provides high ROI despite higher setup costs. Azure ensures smooth deployment; Zadara offers flexible options.

Download Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Zadara Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage has relatively low setup costs compared to Zadara, which tends to have higher setup costs. Zadara offers more customizable setup options, whereas Microsoft Azure provides a more straightforward, cost-effective setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

4.5 out of 5

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

4.5 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Object Storage integrates well with other Microsoft services and excels in ease of use. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers advanced analytics and cost efficiency, which can attract tech buyers seeking superior data management and competitive pricing.

Download Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage provides a competitive price with a more complex setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage provides a competitive price with a more complex setup.

Oracle Database Backup Service

4.1 out of 5

Oracle Database Backup Service

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Object Storage excels in scalability, Azure integration, and cost management. In comparison, Oracle Database Backup Service offers robust data protection and strong Oracle integration. Azure's ease of deployment stands out, whereas Oracle users benefit from its dedicated customer service and long-term ROI.

Download Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage has a higher setup cost compared to Oracle Database Backup Service, making Microsoft Azure Object Storage potentially more expensive initially.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Object Storage has a higher setup cost compared to Oracle Database Backup Service, making Microsoft Azure Object Storage potentially more expensive initially.

Related categories

Public Cloud Storage Services

Cloud Migration

Cloud Storage