Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.0
Amazon S3 offers scalability, cost savings, and data integrity, enabling positive returns and efficient database management for users.
Sentiment score
6.3
Microsoft Azure Object Storage provides scalable, cost-effective cloud solutions with reliable uptime, enhancing efficiency and long-term investment returns.
Moving infrequently accessed data to cheaper classes like Glacier is beneficial for long-term storage at a lower cost.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Amazon S3 support is generally well-rated for its professionalism, despite some delay reports, with extensive documentation aiding management.
Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Azure Object Storage support is praised for premium plans but criticized for slow response times with basic plans.
An engineer is assigned based on the severity of the issue.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Amazon S3 offers scalable, flexible storage with strong security, though learning curve and costs may concern some users across sectors.
Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is praised for its scalability, efficiently supporting substantial workloads and growing user demands.
Data placed in an S3 bucket is replicated across availability zones in a region, ensuring scalability and availability.
Amazon S3's automatic scaling has benefited me, as I don't need to plan storage requirements.
Amazon S3 is easily scalable and performs better compared to other cloud storage solutions.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Amazon S3 is highly reliable for large companies, though users note minor issues with data management and security configuration.
Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is stable, though occasional outages and external factors can impact stability, with varied customer ratings.
Amazon S3 is highly stable.
Transitioning between S3 storage classes, like moving data from the standard class to Glacier or Glacier Deep Archive, has been challenging.
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon S3's interface challenges user experience with complexity, security, performance, and pricing issues, needing improved management and integration features.
Microsoft Azure Object Storage needs performance, stability, cost efficiency improvements, better integration, and enhanced support and UI for users.
The practice of protecting data could be more streamlined or mandatory.
An improvement could be associating the naming with personal accounts, allowing more familiar or desired names without conflicting with global conventions.
In terms of security, I struggled with setting permissions and access control initially.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon S3's pay-as-you-go pricing is cost-effective but may increase with data retrievals and higher usage scenarios.
Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers variable pricing, higher costs for intensive use, with flexible options often seen as expensive.
I've used the free tier and haven't been charged yet.
S3 offers multiple classes, allowing you to move data to cheaper classes for cost savings.
It is somewhat justified due to the benefits, but there is room for reconsideration.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon S3 excels in availability, scalability, security, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use, making it ideal for data storage.
Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers scalability, flexibility, security, ease of use, and performance, with seamless integration and compliance certifications.
I appreciate its capability to create static websites and integrate with services like CloudFront, EC2, and DynamoDB.
Its stability and scalability are also impressive, as it allows for increased storage space according to demand.
Amazon S3 is easily scalable and provides fantastic performance, especially in comparison to other cloud solutions like OCI and Azure.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
79
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 is 11.6%, down from 14.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is 2.0%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

HenryAragon - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers different tiers, enable encryption but there's a lot of complexity
The best thing about S3 is the security. I can enable encryption at rest using a KMS server, a key management server. Key management servers encrypt data, and you need the key to decrypt it. Without the key, you can't access the data. Amazon allows you to use your own servers or theirs. They offer Amazon encryption, which you decide on when you create the bucket. The bucket also has all the other features like versioning. We can do versioning and life cycles. The biggest plus for me as a storage admin is the different tiers: standard, infrequent access, Glacier, and Glacier Deep Archive. The differences between these tiers are cost and data retrieval speed. Standard tier data is considered "hot," meaning it's accessible anytime, but it's expensive. If you want to archive data you won't need often, or if you have ample time to retrieve a backup, the most cost-effective option is Glacier Deep Archive. It's very cheap, but the disadvantage is that when you request data, it takes up to 24 hours to become accessible. There are no limitations on how much you can store, but the biggest limitation is that you cannot use Glacier Deep Archive from the console. You can't go into the AWS console and copy something directly into Deep Glacier, but you can do it from the command line. If you have programmatic access, there's a command to put data directly into Glacier Deep Archive. We don't use anything AI on AWS right now. The AI stuff isn't really too useful for us yet. We're just playing around with Copilot from Microsoft, which is more on the Azure side. We haven't leveraged any AWS AI stuff yet. We've basically just been playing around with Amazon Bedrock, but haven't done anything in production with it.
DanBryant - PeerSpot reviewer
Good SLAs and better suited for large files like videos and anything in the multi-gigabyte range
Support's not great, but Microsoft products are much more industrial strength and enterprise ready than any other services out there. That's why we use them and learn how to use them, even when they change things without much advanced notice. We proactively educate ourselves on how to use it once it's changed. I don't pay for premium support. But at a basic level, Microsoft products can be pretty aggravating to work with. I prefer not to rate it. I don't think a number would accurately describe the experience. We still use it, and it's still valuable. But the experience with Microsoft products, from storage to Teams and everything else, can be quite aggravating.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
76%
Computer Software Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Manufacturing Company
2%
Computer Software Company
22%
Retailer
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon S3?
We can easily connect to the AWS resources.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon S3?
S3 offers multiple classes, allowing you to move data to cheaper classes for cost savings. AWS provides solutions to monitor your budget.
What needs improvement with Amazon S3?
In terms of security, I struggled with setting permissions and access control initially.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The pricing is higher than CNC. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the pricing as six to seven.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The deployment process needs improvement, and it requires a lot of expertise to use and to utilize it.
 

Also Known As

S3, Simple Storage Service
Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.