Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Amazon S3 support is knowledgeable and professional, though some users desire quicker responses and reduced costs.
No sentiment score available
Most users manage independently, but those using Google Cloud Storage support find it professional and efficient, despite occasional delays.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.8
Amazon S3 requires better management, security, cost transparency, UI improvements, faster access, scalability, reduced latency, and enhanced support.
Sentiment score
6.2
Google Cloud Storage needs enhancements in speed, user experience, security, integration, and flexible storage plans with lower costs.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Amazon S3 is valued for its scalable, secure, and efficient storage solutions, suitable for businesses of all sizes and needs.
Sentiment score
6.6
Google Cloud Storage provides scalable and flexible storage solutions, efficiently handling varying workloads and user numbers, though cost concerns exist.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.8
Amazon S3 offers cost-effective, flexible pay-as-you-go storage with extra costs for data retrieval and transfers across regions.
No sentiment score available
Google Cloud Storage's pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective, offers free tiers, and appeals with discounts in select regions.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Amazon S3 is highly reliable, secure, and efficient with minimal maintenance, nearly 100% availability, and rare upload speed issues.
Sentiment score
8.5
Google Cloud Storage is highly stable and reliable, with users praising its consistent performance and smooth integration across locations.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Amazon S3 offers scalable, secure, cost-effective storage with features like versioning, lifecycle policies, multi-zone replication, and AWS integration.
Sentiment score
8.6
Google Cloud Storage is highly valued for scalability, ease of use, security, and seamless integration with diverse business needs.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Google Cloud Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Storage (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 is 11.3%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud Storage is 10.6%, down from 12.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

HenryAragon - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers different tiers, enable encryption but there's a lot of complexity
The best thing about S3 is the security. I can enable encryption at rest using a KMS server, a key management server. Key management servers encrypt data, and you need the key to decrypt it. Without the key, you can't access the data. Amazon allows you to use your own servers or theirs. They offer Amazon encryption, which you decide on when you create the bucket. The bucket also has all the other features like versioning. We can do versioning and life cycles. The biggest plus for me as a storage admin is the different tiers: standard, infrequent access, Glacier, and Glacier Deep Archive. The differences between these tiers are cost and data retrieval speed. Standard tier data is considered "hot," meaning it's accessible anytime, but it's expensive. If you want to archive data you won't need often, or if you have ample time to retrieve a backup, the most cost-effective option is Glacier Deep Archive. It's very cheap, but the disadvantage is that when you request data, it takes up to 24 hours to become accessible. There are no limitations on how much you can store, but the biggest limitation is that you cannot use Glacier Deep Archive from the console. You can't go into the AWS console and copy something directly into Deep Glacier, but you can do it from the command line. If you have programmatic access, there's a command to put data directly into Glacier Deep Archive. We don't use anything AI on AWS right now. The AI stuff isn't really too useful for us yet. We're just playing around with Copilot from Microsoft, which is more on the Azure side. We haven't leveraged any AWS AI stuff yet. We've basically just been playing around with Amazon Bedrock, but haven't done anything in production with it.
Akos Szirmai - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers accessibility from various devices and easy to setup
I never intended to use Google Storage. It was just a backup or auxiliary service to my Gmail account. If someone wants to use it, they probably can use it. I am not sure about the corporate environment. But at a personal level, Google Storage supports a lot of functions of the whole Google package, from the calendar, mail, photos, news, and so on. So, anyone who is using this software is definitely using Google Storage in some way. It is about the core usage. So, if someone is looking for a cloud storage solution, I would suggest using it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
75%
Computer Software Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Manufacturing Company
2%
Educational Organization
72%
Computer Software Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Manufacturing Company
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon S3?
We can easily connect to the AWS resources.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon S3?
The licensing model is complex. If you need your backup data available at all times, but don't access it frequently, there are better options. You could go with S3, but other vendors offer the same...
What needs improvement with Amazon S3?
There's a lot of complexity, but that's unavoidable because it needs to be versatile. You have to be able to get the data in many different ways. For example, if you need to give just one file to s...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?
The pricing for cloud services, including Google, remains challenging in the Philippines, especially for SMEs. These businesses often find cloud solutions more expensive compared to on-premises opt...
What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?
The initial setup appears to be the hardest part, although once familiar with it, the process becomes easier. Pricing remains challenging, especially for SMEs, making cloud services costlier than o...
 

Also Known As

S3, Simple Storage Service
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. Google Cloud Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.