Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while Google is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 17.1% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Google’s 10.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Google users who would recommend it.
Amazon S3 Glacier
Read 38 Amazon S3 Glacier reviews
  • 4,961 Views
  • 4,255 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Google Cloud Storage
Read 76 Google Cloud Storage reviews
  • 4,584 Views
  • 3,100 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Google Cloud Storage and Amazon S3 Glacier are leading cloud storage services catering to different storage needs. Google Cloud Storage is favored for its high accessibility and varied storage classes, while Amazon S3 Glacier shines in long-term archival with cost-effective pricing.

Features: Google Cloud Storage offers high-performance data storage options, seamless integration with other Google services, and flexible storage classes. Amazon S3 Glacier provides cost-effective long-term storage, different retrieval options for infrequent access data, and specialized archival features.

Room for Improvement: Users of Google Cloud Storage often wish for better cost management tools, enhanced security features, and improved data retrieval speeds. Amazon S3 Glacier users desire faster data retrieval times, a more straightforward setup process, and enhanced usability for a broader range of users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage users find the deployment process user-friendly, supported by comprehensive documentation and robust customer service. Amazon S3 Glacier's deployment can be more complex due to its specialized nature, but users are satisfied with Amazon’s customer service in resolving issues.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage’s pricing is perceived to be high, but users find the return on investment positive due to its performance and integration capabilities. Amazon S3 Glacier is praised for its low-cost storage, making it highly appealing for long-term archival needs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 815,597 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3 Glacier
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Google Cloud Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Storage (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 Glacier is 17.1%, up from 15.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud Storage is 10.6%, down from 12.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 8, 2023
A powerful hosting service with an extensive code interface
Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand. I had a personal account once, and I was so scared to type in my credit card because I wasn't sure how much I would be charged. At home, I might turn on the VM to test something, and I might be on there for three minutes wondering how much it could cost. The solution might tell you there are so many hours of free usage and a free VM, but it's still scary because you don't know how much it will cost, even if you go over one second. The price structure needs massive simplifying and made crystal clear so people know what they're paying.
Read full review
Akos Szirmai - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 21, 2023
Offers accessibility from various devices and easy to setup
I never intended to use Google Storage. It was just a backup or auxiliary service to my Gmail account. If someone wants to use it, they probably can use it. I am not sure about the corporate environment. But at a personal level, Google Storage supports a lot of functions of the whole Google package, from the calendar, mail, photos, news, and so on. So, anyone who is using this software is definitely using Google Storage in some way. It is about the core usage. So, if someone is looking for a cloud storage solution, I would suggest using it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is stable."
"The solution is secure."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Its auto-scaling capabilities allow us to add data continuously without needing to pre-provision storage."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is a very cheap storage, where we store infrequently used data."
"We save money with the product."
"The biggest advantage of the product is that AWS always copies the tool internally."
"The pricing is low, and it's dedicated to archiving is valuable to us."
More Amazon S3 Glacier pros
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is the filter option. You can search with some artificial intelligence kinds of features. For example, if I search for a beach, it'll show me all the beach-related pictures, which I took five or ten years before. So this is a cool feature that I've seen. They give as many features as they can to make it better, so I'm happy with this solution."
"Google Cloud Storage is very convenient to use."
"On the phone, I appreciate how seamless it is."
"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Storage include easy API integration for querying, downloading, and uploading files."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is its ease of use. It fits well with our business use."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is that the backup feature is always on."
"The solution offers versioning, which lets us work together efficiently on a single document. What I like most about Google Cloud Storage is its ease of use and the integration of all Google services. It's very efficient for work."
"It is stable and scalable."
More Google Cloud Storage pros
 

Cons

"The solution’s deployment process is complex and could be improved."
"The solution's cost optimization could be improved."
"I would like to see improved storage capacity and enhanced security features for better protection."
"Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand."
"The learning curve is very high."
"The solution's dashboard is a bit complicated and could be improved."
"The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data."
"Amazon S3 Glacier could be more secure."
More Amazon S3 Glacier cons
"Google Cloud Storage could be improved by increasing the drive capacity."
"When compared to one of its competitors, Google Cloud Storage does not have or offer a lot of services to its users. So, this is one of the downsides of the solution."
"I'm not really comfortable with the user interface because I don't use it very often."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Protection is an area in the product where improvements are required."
"A lower cost, lower-end solution for a shared file system is missing."
"I would like to see this solution made faster, cheaper, and bigger."
"The product's user interface is an area of concern where improvements are required."
More Google Cloud Storage cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Amazon S3 Glacier is not an expensive solution, and it has a pay-as-you-go pricing model."
"We pay a monthly licensing fee for Amazon S3 Glacier."
"The tool is too expensive."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."
"I've operated with Amazon S3 Glacier in two modes. Firstly, there's the trial mode, where I experimented with the platform, learned its functionalities, and applied it to my work. Secondly, there's the corporate account mode, where my team handles the operations, and I receive billing reports."
"The solution is cost-effective."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."
"Amazon S3 Glacier has a good pricing point, and you pay for what's being used."
More Amazon S3 Glacier pricing and cost advice
"The solution was very cheap compared to other products."
"There is a license needed to use Google Cloud Storage at our university."
"I pay for a monthly subscription."
"If you're ready to pay, they're ready to give you as much storage as you want. Considering the features that Google Cloud Storage provides, the pricing is reasonable. So far, I'm still using the free service from them because I'm able to meet my requirements with the free subscription. Maybe, in the future, if a storage requirement comes, I'll pay for it or go for the license."
"The price of the license could be cheaper. We are on an annual subscription."
"My company is paying a yearly subscription for the licensing of the solution. It is an expensive solution."
"I use the free version and have never paid for any extra storage. I have been able to manage in whatever free spaces are given."
"The product is not expensive. If you are in India, the tool charges around six to eight USD if I consider the discounts offered by the product."
More Google Cloud Storage pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
815,597 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
34%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
6%
University
6%
Educational Organization
71%
Computer Software Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Manufacturing Company
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, whi...
See all answers
What do you like most about Amazon S3 Glacier?
I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier?
The product could be improved in terms of the customer support team's response times.
See all answers
What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?
It is flexible and simple to use.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?
The pricing for cloud services, including Google, remains challenging in the Philippines, especially for SMEs. These businesses often find cloud solutions more expensive compared to on-premises opt...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?
The initial setup appears to be the hardest part, although once familiar with it, the process becomes easier. Pricing remains challenging, especially for SMEs, making cloud services costlier than o...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Amazon S3 Glacier Logo
Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Amazon S3 Glacier
Compared 46% of the time
Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier Logo
Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier
Compared 9% of the time
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 Glacier Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 Glacier
Compared 9% of the time
Wasabi vs Amazon S3 Glacier Logo
Wasabi vs Amazon S3 Glacier
Compared 8% of the time
Oracle Cloud Archive Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier Logo
Oracle Cloud Archive Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier
Compared 6% of the time
More Amazon S3 Glacier Competitors
AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 19% of the time
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 9% of the time
Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 7% of the time
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 6% of the time
More Google Cloud Storage Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Amazon S3 Glacier
November 2024
Amazon S3 Glacier reportDownload Amazon S3 Glacier product report
Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage
November 2024
Google Cloud Storage reportDownload Google Cloud Storage product report
 

Also Known As

Amazon Glacier
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Google
 

Overview

Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

 

Sample Customers

King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork
Buyer's Guide
Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage
October 2024
Free Report: Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
815,597 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.