Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP comparison

Google and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8, while NetApp is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Storage

Read 77 Google Cloud Storage reviews

2,473 Views
1,637 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 62 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

3,146 Views
1,824 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Storage

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Google Cloud Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP compete in cloud storage and data management solutions. Users generally prefer the pricing and support of Google Cloud Storage, but NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP's advanced features make it a strong contender.

Features: Google Cloud Storage offers scalable storage solutions, seamless integration with other Google services, and robust security measures. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP provides comprehensive data management tools such as SnapMirror, FlexClone, and advanced data protection capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage requires enhancements in data migration tools, improved support for legacy systems, and better user documentation. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP needs a more intuitive management interface, enhanced integration with non-NetApp environments, and streamlined setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is praised for straightforward deployment and seamless integration with Google's ecosystem. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP handles complex deployments but has a steeper learning curve. Both offer highly rated customer service, with Google Cloud having an edge in initial setup and integration.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage features competitive pricing, especially for long-term storage, and offers good ROI due to its scalability and lower maintenance costs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP has higher pricing reflecting its advanced features and data management capabilities, offering solid ROI for enterprises with complex data needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage

Ranking in Cloud Storage

2nd

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Cloud Storage

1st

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Backup (10th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (1st)

Featured Reviews

Naresh Kumar

Founder & Director at Hiindsight Group

Offers great reliability to users

Protection is an area in the product where improvements are required. If big companies want to use the tool for protection purposes, like security, which is a big thing people are looking for nowadays. Sometimes, the tool's user interface automatically puts all the files in a different place, making it a bit difficult to go deep and figure out in which folder a file is present. I need to search for a file and drill down to be able to find it. There are a few bugs in the tool, as with all content management tools, since the solution is usually used to deal with huge amounts of content. If the flow of the documents is huge, the tool might get slow for the end users, or when the data is being migrated or imported into the tools.

Read full review

Pramod-Talekar

Sr Service Engineer at Evolent Health

Allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution

The tool's most valuable features are the SnapLock and SnapMirror features. If something goes wrong with the data, we can restore it. This isn't a mirror; we store data in different locations. If there's an issue on the primary site, we can retrieve data from the secondary site. Multiprotocol support in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is beneficial because it allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution. This feature eliminates the need to purchase different types of storage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From an availability perspective it's fantastic; from a security perspective it's fantastic."

"You do not need to install anything."

"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is the filter option. You can search with some artificial intelligence kinds of features. For example, if I search for a beach, it'll show me all the beach-related pictures, which I took five or ten years before. So this is a cool feature that I've seen. They give as many features as they can to make it better, so I'm happy with this solution."

"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Storage are flexibility and sustainability."

"The solution's most valuable features are availability, feasibility, and reachability."

"The performance is good."

"It is stable and scalable."

"Google Cloud Storage is easy to use, and it's free. I also enjoy the speed I am able to share with family across the globe. The storage is synced."

More Google Cloud Storage pros

"This solution has made everything easier to do."

"NetApp's XCP Migration Tool... was pretty awesome. It replicated the data faster than any other tool that I've seen. That was a big help."

"The FlexClones make all the management easier for us."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of file storage."

"The most valuable features are that it's reliable, simple, and performs well."

"For us, the value comes from the solution's flexibility, speed, and hopefully cost savings in the long term."

"They have very good support team who is very helpful. They will help you with every aspect of getting the deployment done."

"The initial setup was straightforward. We started with a small pilot and we then moved to production with no downtime at all."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

Cons

"The solution should have two factor authentication."

"I am not sure about the reliability of the solution."

"The user experience needs to be simplified."

"They need more enhancements in the security features."

"It is stable, but it can always be more stable."

"Google Cloud Storage is scalable, but you have to pay extra."

"Google Cloud Storage could improve by having better integration with Microsoft Office files. When I open a Google document I would like it to be able to be opened with Microsoft. You can already open Google documents in Microsoft Office."

"Google Cloud Storage could be improved by increasing the drive capacity."

More Google Cloud Storage cons

"I think the challenge now is more in terms of keeping an air gap. The notion that it is in the cloud, easy to break, etc. The challenge now is mostly about the air gap and how we can protect that in the cloud."

"NetApp's support could improve"

"The key feature, that we'd like to see in that is the ability to sync between regions within the AWS and Azure regions. We could use the cloud sync service, but we'd really like that native functionality within the cloud volume service."

"In terms of improvement, I would like to see the Azure NetApp Files have the capability of doing SnapMirrors. Azure NetApp Files is, as we know, is an AFF system and it's not used in any of the Microsoft resources. It's basically NetApp hardware, so the best performance you can achieve, but the only reason we can't use that right now is because of the region that it's available in. The second was the SnapMirror capability that we didn't have that we heavily rely on right now."

"One difficulty is that it has no SAP HANA certification. The asset performance restrictions create challenges with the infrastructure underneath: The disks and stuff like that often have lower latencies than SAP HANA itself has to have."

"I rate the scalability a five out of ten."

"In the next release, I would like to see more options on the dashboard."

"Multipathing for iSCSI LUNs is difficult to deal with from the client-side and I'd love to see a single entry point that can be moved around within the cluster to simplify the client configuration."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I pay monthly for Google Cloud Storage. It could be cheaper, but for now, it's okay."

"Regarding the cost of the solution, Google offers its users a pay-as-you-go model pricing."

"It provides a very limited amount of storage because it's free."

"The solution is free."

"I pay a yearly subscription fee."

"The price of Google Cloud Storage is reasonable when compared to other similar solutions."

"I am paying a yearly subscription fee."

"If you want a shared file system, you have to buy a server with the minimum capacity of one TB."

More Google Cloud Storage pricing and cost advice

"For NetApp it's about $20,000 for a single node and $30,000 for the HA."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"I know the licensing is a bit on the high-end. That's when we had to downsize our MetroCluster disks and just migrate to disks that were half used. We migrated into those just to reduce maintenance costs."

"The standard pricing is online. Pricing depends. If you're using the PayGo model, then it's just the normal costs on the Microsoft page. If you're using Bring Your Own License, which is what we're doing, then you get with your sales contact at NetApp and start figuring out what price is the best, in the end, for your company."

"Make sure you investigate what your requirements are going to cost you using the native cloud solutions versus what NetApp is going to cost you, to make sure you have a business case to go with NetApp."

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good, but it was a test system, not a real purchase."

"For enterprise customers, it's a very cost effective. But in the SMB segment, yeah, pricing is a little bit challenge for your time."

"Once we deploy the pay as you go model, we cannot convert this product as a BYOL model. This is a concern that we have."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

73%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

54%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?

It is flexible and simple to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?

Depending on your setup, Google Cloud Storage is economical, especially if you do not need high stability and scalability. We use it for backup, so the storage that is not used often is affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?

So far, when it comes to security, it meets our needs and requirements, so I have nothing to say about improvements to their services. I do not find any areas needing improvement currently.

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp's support could improve.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 23% of the time

AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 9% of the time

Google Workspace vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Competitors

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 13% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 11% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 4% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage

December 2024

Download Google Cloud Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

December 2024

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Also Known As

No data available

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

Learn More

Google

NetApp

Overview

Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

November 2024

Free Report: Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors and best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.