Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP comparison

Google and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8, while NetApp is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0. Google holds a 8.7% mindshare in CS, compared to NetApp’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Storage

Read 78 Google Cloud Storage reviews

2,002 Views
1,245 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 62 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

2,645 Views
1,541 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Storage

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Google Cloud Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP compete in cloud storage and data management solutions. Users generally prefer the pricing and support of Google Cloud Storage, but NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP's advanced features make it a strong contender.

Features: Google Cloud Storage offers scalable storage solutions, seamless integration with other Google services, and robust security measures. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP provides comprehensive data management tools such as SnapMirror, FlexClone, and advanced data protection capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage requires enhancements in data migration tools, improved support for legacy systems, and better user documentation. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP needs a more intuitive management interface, enhanced integration with non-NetApp environments, and streamlined setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is praised for straightforward deployment and seamless integration with Google's ecosystem. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP handles complex deployments but has a steeper learning curve. Both offer highly rated customer service, with Google Cloud having an edge in initial setup and integration.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage features competitive pricing, especially for long-term storage, and offers good ROI due to its scalability and lower maintenance costs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP has higher pricing reflecting its advanced features and data management capabilities, offering solid ROI for enterprises with complex data needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage

Ranking in Cloud Storage

2nd

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Cloud Storage

1st

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Backup (9th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Storage category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage is 8.7%, down from 12.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 12.9%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage

Featured Reviews

Manimaran Tannimalai

Managing Partner at Cloud Analytics Sdn Bhd

User interface consistency facilitates seamless project planning and design for specialized tasks

While Google has made efforts to address SAP loads, the company lacks a product specialist focus. They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches. Google's strength lies in their adapted approach to specific tasks, as seen with SAP loads. Generally, their focus is widespread.

Read full review

Pramod-Talekar

Sr Service Engineer at Evolent Health

Allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution

The tool's most valuable features are the SnapLock and SnapMirror features. If something goes wrong with the data, we can restore it. This isn't a mirror; we store data in different locations. If there's an issue on the primary site, we can retrieve data from the secondary site. Multiprotocol support in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is beneficial because it allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution. This feature eliminates the need to purchase different types of storage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Google Cloud Storage has proven most valuable for our data management needs due to its bandwidth speed for backing up and restoring data."

"Google Cloud Storage includes Docs, calendar, Gmail, Google Drive, and Google Meet."

"It’s very stable."

"You do not need to install anything."

"Google Cloud Storage is easy to use, and it's free. I also enjoy the speed I am able to share with family across the globe. The storage is synced."

"It's user-friendly. We find it to be very easy to use."

"Google Cloud Storage is very convenient to use."

"The feature we've found most valuable is the ability to access our data anywhere, anytime."

More Google Cloud Storage pros

"It makes sure we have control of the data and that we know what it's being used for. The main thing for us is that we need to know what applications are consuming it and responsible for it. The solution helps us do that."

"If you have a larger amount of data than normal in cloud, it is easy to provision and maintain. Waiting for the delivery of the controller, the configuration of enclosures, etc., all this stuff is eliminated compared to using on-premise."

"The FlexClones make all the management easier for us."

"The initial setup was straightforward. We started with a small pilot and we then moved to production with no downtime at all."

"We use the mirroring to mirror our volumes to our DR location. We also create snapshots for backups. Snapshots will create a specified snapshot to be able to do a DR test without disrupting our standard mirrors. That means we can create a point-in-time snapshot, then use the ability of FlexClones to make a writeable volume to test with, and then blow it away after the DR test."

"We are definitely in the process of reducing our footprint on our secondary data center and all those snapshots technically reduce tape backup. That's from the protection perspective, but as far as files, it's much easier to use and manage and it's faster, too."

"The most valuable features of this solution are SnapShot, FlexClone, and deduplication."

"NetApp's XCP Migration Tool... was pretty awesome. It replicated the data faster than any other tool that I've seen. That was a big help."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

Cons

"The product must provide less frequent updates."

"The security of this solution and its performance could still be improved."

"I would like to see this solution made faster, cheaper, and bigger."

"Google Cloud Storage could improve by having better integration with Microsoft Office files. When I open a Google document I would like it to be able to be opened with Microsoft. You can already open Google documents in Microsoft Office."

"Google Cloud Storage could be improved by increasing the drive capacity."

"They need to get some parts of the program more mature, like the admin management part as well as the monitoring part."

"Sometimes, I'm not too fond of privacy policies, especially when using certain features like Gemini AI, where agreeing to the terms might mean losing access to your history. One area for improvement is document retrieval—sometimes, it's hard to find documents because the file names aren't always recognizable, and the preview feature could be more efficient. Maintenance for Google Cloud Storage is minimal, but it would be helpful to have a tool that automatically removes duplicate versions of files to save space. The file management in Google Cloud and Workspace isn't very straightforward, which could be improved."

"A lower cost, lower-end solution for a shared file system is missing."

More Google Cloud Storage cons

"The solution is not stable when using single nodes. This is a problem. NetApp should work on this solution to make it more stable with HA nodes and resolve this issue."

"The key feature, that we'd like to see in that is the ability to sync between regions within the AWS and Azure regions. We could use the cloud sync service, but we'd really like that native functionality within the cloud volume service."

"The integration wizard requires a bit of streamlining. There are small things that misconfigure or repeat the deployment that will create errors, specifically in Azure."

"I would like to see more information about Cloud Volumes ONTAP using Google Cloud Platform on NetApp's website."

"We want to be able to add more than six disks in aggregate, but there is a limit of the number of disks in aggregate. In GCP, they provide less by limiting the sixth disk in aggregate. In Azure, the same solution provides 12 disks in an aggregate versus GCP where it is just half that amount. They should bump up the disk in aggregate requirement so we don't have to migrate the aggregate from one to another when the capacities are full."

"When it comes to a critical or a read-write-intensive application, it doesn't provide the performance that some applications require, especially for SAP. The SAP HANA database has a write-latency of less than 2 milliseconds and the CVO solution does not fit there. It could be used for other databases, where the requirements are not so demanding, especially when it comes to write-latency."

"I would want more visibility and data analytics where we can see anomalies within the shares within the GUI."

"I rate the scalability a five out of ten."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am paying a yearly subscription fee."

"The solution comes with a cost once a person has exceeded a certain limit."

"I just use the free storage that comes with Gmail. I have 15 gigabytes."

"We don't pay for a Google Cloud Storage subscription."

"The product is not expensive. If you are in India, the tool charges around six to eight USD if I consider the discounts offered by the product."

"The price of Google Cloud Storage is reasonable when compared to other similar solutions."

"The solution was very cheap compared to other products."

"We pay a monthly subscription."

More Google Cloud Storage pricing and cost advice

"For enterprise customers, it's a very cost effective. But in the SMB segment, yeah, pricing is a little bit challenge for your time."

"The pricing could be improved. It is a good product, but it is very expensive for me."

"Some flexibility around the licensing model would help. The product is licensed based on capacity. Basically, the largest capacity license that you can buy is 368 terabytes. At this point, NetApp is addressing some people's concerns around this."

"They give us a good price for CVO licenses. It is one of the reasons that we went with the product."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"Make sure you investigate what your requirements are going to cost you using the native cloud solutions versus what NetApp is going to cost you, to make sure you have a business case to go with NetApp."

"Compared to other storage vendors, NetApp, is not always able to compete with their pricing. Yet, we acknowledge the ease of use ONTAP brings with the AWS integration."

"The cost is quite high."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

74%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

55%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?

It is flexible and simple to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?

Google Cloud ( /products/google-cloud-reviews ) was cheaper compared to AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) and Azure ( /products/microsoft-azure-reviews ). AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) wa...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp's support could improve.

See all answers

Comparisons

AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 10% of the time

Google Workspace vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Competitors

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 14% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage

March 2025

Download Google Cloud Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

March 2025

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Also Known As

No data available

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

Overview

Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

Google

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

February 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors and best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.