Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8, while Google is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 10.9% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Google’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon S3 Glacier

Read 43 Amazon S3 Glacier reviews

3,246 Views
3,051 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Read 10 Google Cloud Storage Nearline reviews

1,708 Views
1,691 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon S3 Glacier

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage Nearline compete in data storage solutions. Amazon S3 Glacier is often deemed more cost-effective, especially for infrequently accessed data, while Google Cloud Storage Nearline is noted for its enhanced access features and integration with Google's ecosystem.

Features: Amazon S3 Glacier offers low-cost archival storage, auto-archiving capabilities, and strong integrations with AWS services, making it ideal for various storage needs. Its security features and scalability enhance its value. Google Cloud Storage Nearline is favored for its ease of access and adaptation to data flow changes. It provides seamless integration with Google Cloud services and offers enhanced accessibility features.

Room for Improvement: Amazon S3 Glacier could enhance data retrieval speeds and improve its pricing model transparency. Users suggest better GDPR compliance and security features. Google Cloud Storage Nearline can work on reducing costs, enhancing security features, and improving its documentation and user interface for better navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage Nearline are widely used in public cloud environments. Amazon provides extensive partner support and efficient customer service, though response times could be quicker. Google Cloud offers robust support with specialized options for business services, ensuring swift issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 Glacier is generally viewed as more affordable due to its pay-what-you-use model with low storage costs, although data retrieval can be costly. Google Cloud Storage Nearline, while more expensive, offers higher availability and access speed, with both products providing strong ROI by reducing the need for on-premises infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,044 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3 Glacier

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 Glacier is 10.9%, down from 17.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud Storage Nearline is 6.5%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon S3 Glacier	10.9%
Google Cloud Storage Nearline	6.5%
Other	82.6%

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Pat Fogarty

Project Engineer at Astellas Pharma US

Archiving data has reduced storage costs and provides reliable long‑term retention

We have not really come across any downsides for us. It is possible that the retrieval of data may be expensive, which could be an issue, but we have not experienced that in fairness. Integration with our policies would be beneficial. We have policies for our systems where we delete data after a certain number of years, and having integration with Amazon S3 Glacier would be good. Having a guarantee that Amazon S3 Glacier would persist for the amount of time that we require in our archives would be valuable. In other words, Amazon would need to commit to support for the period we need. We could be talking about 20 years or longer. We cannot always move to the next version because we need to maintain old systems and legacy systems in order to maintain archives. A guarantee around support would be a good thing to have.

Read full review

Yogesh Daga

Works

Optimized cost solutions boost long-term data retention across multiple regions

The best part of Nearline storage is the ability to take backups at optimal costs and its availability across multiple regions. It has 99.99% availability, which is extremely good. It provides an ideal storage solution for data that needs to be kept for thirty days or longer. Each storage class, such as Standard for daily data, Nearline, Coldline, and Archive, serves a specific purpose. Coldline is for ninety days, and Archive is for three hundred and sixty-five days.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution for migration."

"The main advantage of Glacier is its low cost. It is incredibly cheaper than other storage options, especially for objects you don't access frequently. Glacier would add value if you have a staging area for objects you only need to access occasionally. Since we have data in terabytes between S3 buckets, we can significantly reduce our storage and cost footprint by using Glacier."

"The most valuable feature of Glacier is its storage capability and cost benefit."

"The solution is stable."

"It is the most feature-rich platform."

"The product is easy to use."

"The biggest advantage of the product is that AWS always copies the tool internally."

"We get free credits from Amazon, and we like the overall stability. We haven't had to rely heavily on their customer success teams, which is a good sign."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pros

"The data structure and the types of data that are supported are very good."

"The best part of Nearline storage is the ability to take backups at optimal costs and its availability across multiple regions."

"Nearline is highly stable."

"Google is always introducing new features and tends to have a new release every month."

"The most valuable aspect of Google Cloud Storage Nearline is its integration with the wider Google Cloud ecosystem."

"I find the flexibility in storing documents or data and the ease of retrieval valuable with this solution."

"The capacity and space on offer are excellent."

"It provides the necessary support and flexibility to manage data storage effectively, especially during times of variable data flow."

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline pros

Cons

"The pricing is a bit expensive. There is room for improvement in costs."

"The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data."

"The product needs to improve cloud security."

"However, improvement is needed in pricing and support systems."

"The cost of retrieval in Glacier is quite high."

"The solution's pricing is too expensive and could be improved."

"I would like to see improved storage capacity and enhanced security features for better protection."

"The tool could be made cheaper."

More Amazon S3 Glacier cons

"One area that needs improvement is the documentation, which I find to be disorganized and not user-friendly."

"The pricing is quite high."

"The UI could be a little bit more effective."

"From a storage standpoint, it would be beneficial if the retrieval cost could be optimized, as it is comparatively higher than storage costs in Nearline."

"One area that needs improvement is the documentation, which I find to be disorganized and not user-friendly."

"They should provide more options or flexibility in terms of pricing."

"The suggestion for improvement primarily revolves around cost efficiency."

"The interface for managing file storage in the buckets could be improved."

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."

"Amazon S3 Glacier has a good pricing point, and you pay for what's being used."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee for Amazon S3 Glacier."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a little expensive solution."

"The pricing is average and reasonable. It varies depending on the region."

"There is no license, you pay for what you use."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."

"The price point at which the product is available is pretty good."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pricing and cost advice

"Google Cloud Storage Nearline is very inexpensive. It costs us less than $50 a month to store our files. We use approximately 10 terabytes. Overall, I would rate the product a five out of five for affordability."

"Right now, for the number of servers and the storage that I have, I would say I'm charged between $125 and $150 per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,044 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Computer Software Company

15%

University

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, whi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon S3 Glacier?

I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage Nearline?

The storage and access cost of Nearline are considered optimal compared to other cloud storage solutions, although I lack a clear view of other cloud storage costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage Nearline?

From a storage standpoint, it would be beneficial if the retrieval cost could be optimized, as it is comparatively higher than storage costs in Nearline.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Storage Nearline?

I mostly use Google Cloud Storage Nearline ( /products/google-cloud-storage-nearline-reviews ) for backing up data that is not needed for daily activities. It is ideal for files that need to be sto...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 9% of the time

Wasabi vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 9% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Cloud Archive Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon S3 Glacier Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Compared 4% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier

February 2026

Download Amazon S3 Glacier product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

February 2026

Download Google Cloud Storage Nearline product report

Also Known As

Amazon Glacier

No data available

Overview

Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

A low-cost, highly-durable and highly available storage service for infrequently accessed data, data archiving, online backup and disaster recovery. Data is available instantly, not within hours or days. With sub-second average response times and 1 cent per GB/month pricing, Cloud Storage Nearline gives you terrific performance at a low cost.

Google

Sample Customers

King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline

February 2026

Free Report: Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,044 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.