Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while Google is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 17.4% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Google’s 8.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon S3 Glacier

Read 38 Amazon S3 Glacier reviews

4,756 Views
4,059 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Read 8 Google Cloud Storage Nearline reviews

1,727 Views
1,523 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon S3 Glacier

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage Nearline are popular solutions for long-term data archiving. Amazon S3 Glacier leads in pricing and data retrieval convenience, while Google Cloud Storage Nearline offers a superior feature set and overall value for price.

Features: Amazon S3 Glacier is praised for simple, low-cost data archiving. Google Cloud Storage Nearline offers fast access times, seamless integration with other Google Cloud services, and superior integration features.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Amazon S3 Glacier could benefit from faster data retrieval times, improved customer service, and a more user-friendly interface. Google Cloud Storage Nearline users indicate areas for improvement in reducing access fees, enhancing integration with non-Google services, and expanding customer support hours.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon S3 Glacier is generally easy to deploy but has mixed reviews on customer support. Google Cloud Storage Nearline offers straightforward deployment with better-rated customer service and superior customer support and ease of deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 Glacier is commended for low setup costs and high ROI in long-term storage scenarios. Google Cloud Storage Nearline has somewhat higher setup costs but offers a strong ROI due to faster data access, promising better value through quicker access and integration with other services.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3 Glacier

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 Glacier is 17.4%, up from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud Storage Nearline is 8.8%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

A powerful hosting service with an extensive code interface

Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand. I had a personal account once, and I was so scared to type in my credit card because I wasn't sure how much I would be charged. At home, I might turn on the VM to test something, and I might be on there for three minutes wondering how much it could cost. The solution might tell you there are so many hours of free usage and a free VM, but it's still scary because you don't know how much it will cost, even if you go over one second. The price structure needs massive simplifying and made crystal clear so people know what they're paying.

Read full review

Darasimi Ajewole

Software Engineer at Formplus

Provides APIs for everything and has good protection through encryption

As a lead developer, I struggled with the documentation for GCP. This could be improved by being made more clear. Also, the interface for managing file storage in the buckets could be improved, together with improved search and filter options. For the next release, I would like to see the solution behave more like a regular file-based system. Google Cloud Storage depends on OS, or it's supposed to be on Google Drive or another storage service. Google Storage files are sometimes very different. The solution should be expanded to be like a file-based system so that you can build a fast tool that stores files in Google Drive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reliability of storage is the main benefit."

"It is a very comprehensive tool."

"I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done in a simpler manner."

"We use the solution for migration."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a stable and scalable solution."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is easy to use. The platform is straightforward, and the interfaces are user-friendly and responsive. Even with a limited budget, you can train someone without an AWS certification to use it. With on-the-job training, you can ensure they understand what needs to be done to use the service."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a scalable and easy-to-manage solution with good read-write capability."

"The solution is stable."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pros

"The capacity and space on offer are excellent."

"It can isolate files and stop them from corrupting other files."

"Google is always introducing new features and tends to have a new release every month."

"Nearline is highly stable."

"I find the flexibility in storing documents or data and the ease of retrieval valuable with this solution."

"The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as salary information, to Nearline."

"It provides the necessary support and flexibility to manage data storage effectively, especially during times of variable data flow."

"The data structure and the types of data that are supported are very good."

Cons

"I would like to see improved storage capacity and enhanced security features for better protection."

"The product could be improved in terms of the customer support team's response times."

"Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand."

"I am unsure if the product provides good integration capabilities. From an improvement perspective, I want the tool to provide easier integration features."

"The solution's dashboard is a bit complicated and could be improved."

"They should increase the data limit for the free version or reduce the price."

"The product takes more time to secure data when the bandwidth is low."

"The product is difficult to use."

More Amazon S3 Glacier cons

"The interface for managing file storage in the buckets could be improved."

"The pricing is quite high."

"Nearline security could be better. The solution could integrate better with SEIM tools."

"They should provide more options or flexibility in terms of pricing."

"The solution needs to offer better System Information and Event Management (SEIM). I'd like to discover how we could implement something like that within Google's cloud."

"The UI could be a little bit more effective."

"They need a better, more visual, user interface for folders and files."

"The suggestion for improvement primarily revolves around cost efficiency."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is very cheap."

"I've operated with Amazon S3 Glacier in two modes. Firstly, there's the trial mode, where I experimented with the platform, learned its functionalities, and applied it to my work. Secondly, there's the corporate account mode, where my team handles the operations, and I receive billing reports."

"The pricing is average and reasonable. It varies depending on the region."

"There is no license, you pay for what you use."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."

"The product is cheap."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a little expensive solution."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee for Amazon S3 Glacier."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pricing and cost advice

"Google Cloud Storage Nearline is very inexpensive. It costs us less than $50 a month to store our files. We use approximately 10 terabytes. Overall, I would rate the product a five out of five for affordability."

"Right now, for the number of servers and the storage that I have, I would say I'm charged between $125 and $150 per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

34%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

University

Computer Software Company

21%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, whi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon S3 Glacier?

I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier?

I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage. Additionally, improvements in configuration manage...

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage Nearline?

The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as salary information, to Nearline.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage Nearline?

The pricing of the different storage classes is hard to compare. The higher the zone, the higher the price. The advantage is that you can access the data frequently, and the speed of the response i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage Nearline?

The UI could be a little bit more effective. Now, the UI is just a white background, but it's really helpful if there are options to change the theme. I prefer that.

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 9% of the time

Wasabi vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Cloud Archive Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon S3 Glacier Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Compared 3% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier

December 2024

Download Amazon S3 Glacier product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

December 2024

Download Google Cloud Storage Nearline product report

Also Known As

Amazon Glacier

No data available

Learn More

Video not available

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google

Overview

Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

A low-cost, highly-durable and highly available storage service for infrequently accessed data, data archiving, online backup and disaster recovery. Data is available instantly, not within hours or days. With sub-second average response times and 1 cent per GB/month pricing, Cloud Storage Nearline gives you terrific performance at a low cost.

Sample Customers

King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline

December 2024

Free Report: Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.