Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 17.1% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Microsoft’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Amazon S3 Glacier

Read 38 Amazon S3 Glacier reviews

4,961 Views
4,255 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Read 45 Microsoft Azure File Storage reviews

4,234 Views
3,484 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Amazon S3 Glacier

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Amazon S3 Glacier and Microsoft Azure File Storage compete in the cloud storage category. Microsoft Azure File Storage has the upper hand in features, which justifies its pricing.

Features: Amazon S3 Glacier is known for long-term storage, durability, and cost-effectiveness for large-scale archival needs. Microsoft Azure File Storage is recognized for seamless integration with existing systems, improved performance in accessing files, and managed file shares in the cloud.

Room for Improvement: Amazon S3 Glacier should enhance retrieval times, optimize user interface, and provide better support for large datasets. Microsoft Azure File Storage could improve synchronization capabilities, expand cross-platform functionality, and offer more comprehensive training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon S3 Glacier offers straightforward deployment but has mixed customer support reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage integrates seamlessly within the Azure ecosystem, alongside receiving positive feedback for responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 Glacier is cost-effective for large-scale archival needs with satisfactory ROI. Microsoft Azure File Storage features competitive pricing with potentially higher ROI due to its robust features and service quality.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Customer Service

No sentiment score available

Amazon S3 Glacier support is praised for efficiency and knowledge, but some find it unresponsive or costly without premium service.

Sentiment score

5.2

Microsoft Azure File Storage support varies in responsiveness and quality, influenced by customer status, location, and type of partnership.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon S3 Glacier report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure File Storage report

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available

Amazon S3 Glacier needs faster retrieval, enhanced integration, cost transparency, improved user experience, security, and GDPR compliance improvements.

Sentiment score

4.3

Microsoft Azure File Storage needs enhanced ease of use, pricing clarity, integrations, security features, and improved user experience.

I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage.

MoazzamAli

Sr DevOps Engineer at HTC Global

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon S3 Glacier report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure File Storage report

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available

Amazon S3 Glacier is highly scalable with seamless data auto-scaling, easy integration, and widely praised for its reliability.

Sentiment score

8.3

Microsoft Azure File Storage is scalable and adaptable for various organization sizes, efficiently handling user needs with dynamic cloud capabilities.

Amazon S3 Glacier auto-scales according to the data.

MoazzamAli

Sr DevOps Engineer at HTC Global

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon S3 Glacier report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure File Storage report

Setup Cost

Sentiment score

7.8

Amazon S3 Glacier offers cost-effective storage with a complex pricing model, leading to concerns over unexpected expenses and comparisons to on-premises options.

No sentiment score available

Microsoft Azure File Storage pricing is variable and less transparent, with potentially higher costs and various additional fees for support and licensing.

While it's generally cost-effective, the pricing model could be clearer.

MoazzamAli

Sr DevOps Engineer at HTC Global

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon S3 Glacier report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure File Storage report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.5

Amazon S3 Glacier is highly stable with excellent reliability, minimal downtime, and recommended monitoring for effective deployment management.

No sentiment score available

Microsoft Azure File Storage is praised for stability and reliability, with users reporting minimal issues and high stability ratings.

Amazon S3 Glacier is quite stable, nine out of ten.

MoazzamAli

Sr DevOps Engineer at HTC Global

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon S3 Glacier report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure File Storage report

Valuable Features

Sentiment score

7.5

Amazon S3 Glacier provides cost-effective, scalable, and secure data archiving with seamless S3 integration and efficient data retrieval.

Sentiment score

8.5

Microsoft Azure File Storage offers flexible, secure, and cost-effective file storage with high availability, seamless integration, and convenient file transfer capabilities.

The most valuable features of Amazon S3 Glacier are its cost-effectiveness for data archiving and its durability.

MoazzamAli

Sr DevOps Engineer at HTC Global

For more quotes and insights, download the Amazon S3 Glacier report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure File Storage report

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3 Glacier

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 Glacier is 17.1%, up from 15.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 12.9%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

A powerful hosting service with an extensive code interface

Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand. I had a personal account once, and I was so scared to type in my credit card because I wasn't sure how much I would be charged. At home, I might turn on the VM to test something, and I might be on there for three minutes wondering how much it could cost. The solution might tell you there are so many hours of free usage and a free VM, but it's still scary because you don't know how much it will cost, even if you go over one second. The price structure needs massive simplifying and made crystal clear so people know what they're paying.

Read full review

Pmurki@Micron.Com Praveen

VP & GM, Client Storage at Micron Technology

Setup takes minimal efforts and good product to keep files for our ETL process

We use it for ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes. We get files from different tools related to our micro-processing, copy them into Azure File Storage, and then consume them for parsing and loading It's good overall. We just use Azure File Storage as a way to keep files for our ETL process.…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

34%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

University

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, whi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon S3 Glacier?

I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier?

The product could be improved in terms of the customer support team's response times.

See all answers

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure File Storage?

The product is a reliable cloud solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?

As for the current licensing and payment structure, it's almost pay-as-you-go. Monthly is okay. But maybe we'll get a better price if we have a long-term contract and pay monthly.

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 47% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 9% of the time

Wasabi vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Cloud Archive Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon S3 Glacier Competitors

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 49% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 17% of the time

Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 7% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier

November 2024

Download Amazon S3 Glacier product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage

November 2024

Download Microsoft Azure File Storage product report

Also Known As

Amazon Glacier

MS Azure File Storage

Learn More

Video not available

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Microsoft

Overview

Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

Key scenarios:

Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
Integrate modern applications with File storage
Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

Sample Customers

King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud

Talon, Camden

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage

October 2024

Free Report: Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.