Google Cloud Storage vs Microsoft Azure File Storage comparison

Google and Microsoft are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Google is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Google holds a 10.6% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Microsoft’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Storage

Read 76 Google Cloud Storage reviews

4,584 Views
3,100 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Read 45 Microsoft Azure File Storage reviews

4,234 Views
3,484 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Storage

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Google Cloud Storage and Microsoft Azure File Storage compete in the storage market. Google Cloud Storage stands out for ease of deployment, while Microsoft Azure File Storage has a stronger feature set and customer support.

Features: Google Cloud Storage offers scalability, durability, and integrated data analytics. Microsoft Azure File Storage provides seamless integration with Windows environments, advanced security features, and hybrid cloud capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage needs better offline support, improved management interface for large datasets, and enhanced usability. Microsoft Azure File Storage users highlight occasional performance lags, a better user experience, and improved documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is praised for a straightforward setup and deployment process, although its customer service could be more responsive. Microsoft Azure File Storage is slightly more complex to deploy but offers robust and responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage is valued for competitive pricing and a transparent cost structure, contributing to a favorable ROI. Microsoft Azure File Storage, though more expensive, justifies the cost through its extensive features and strong support, enhancing overall ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,597 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (2nd)

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage is 10.6%, down from 12.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 12.9%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Akos Szirmai

Application Development Specialist at Field consulting Ltd.

Nov 21, 2023

Offers accessibility from various devices and easy to setup

I never intended to use Google Storage. It was just a backup or auxiliary service to my Gmail account. If someone wants to use it, they probably can use it. I am not sure about the corporate environment. But at a personal level, Google Storage supports a lot of functions of the whole Google package, from the calendar, mail, photos, news, and so on. So, anyone who is using this software is definitely using Google Storage in some way. It is about the core usage. So, if someone is looking for a cloud storage solution, I would suggest using it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Pmurki@Micron.Com Praveen

VP & GM, Client Storage at Micron Technology

Aug 19, 2024

Setup takes minimal efforts and good product to keep files for our ETL process

We use it for ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes. We get files from different tools related to our micro-processing, copy them into Azure File Storage, and then consume them for parsing and loading It's good overall. We just use Azure File Storage as a way to keep files for our ETL process.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to use."

"There's no implementation process."

"I could store any type of file using the solution."

"The performance is good."

"One of the most valuable features of the solution is its ease of use."

"The most valuable features are Pub/Sub, Data Explorer, BigQuery, and Data Transfer."

"Google Cloud is handy and easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is that I can link with my PC."

More Google Cloud Storage pros

"It's a scalable solution."

"The biggest advantage of Azure File Storage vis-à-vis other public cloud storage providers, and why we recommend Azure first and foremost, is that many of our customers have partnerships with Microsoft and so they have access to better cloud economics. Compared to AWS, we have found that (from a customer perspective) Azure is much more competitive."

"Implementing Microsoft Azure has meant that we are using the same solution as our customers who use Azure Public Cloud. This allows us to integrate our application, as well as provide the solution to them."

"The security features and the ease of integration are good."

"Implementations with other products are easy."

"The solution is user-friendly and integrates easily with web apps."

"Its most valuable features are speed and security."

"The immutable storage features are valuable."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage pros

Cons

"I would like the ability to query and filter documents to download them according to specific criteria."

"The solution should offer more free storage."

"Google Cloud Storage could improve by increasing the storage from 15 GB. If I want to have more storage I need to pay extra money."

"The tool should be cheaper."

"It would be helpful to offer more packages to increase the storage."

"They need to get some parts of the program more mature, like the admin management part as well as the monitoring part."

"User management could be better. It's complicated process to delete users and maintain the structure of documents created by deleted users."

"Google Cloud Storage could improve the integrations in a way Microsoft Azure is going about it. For Data Lake integrations, Microsoft Azure has a bunch of native pipelines available. All Google needs to do is add the same set or maybe even improve on the sets that they have. All the analytics, including the Data Lake, would then be able to sit in Google Cloud Storage."

More Google Cloud Storage cons

"The product name keeps changing. It can be confusing when product names change frequently, especially with Microsoft. Sometimes, if you refer to a product by a certain name last year, it might have a different name six months later."

"The initial setup is complex. Unless you have done it a few times it, it is going to be hard."

"It’s a challenge to find the right support person."

"They can improve the ability to assign permissions to different groups or users."

"The pricing and technical support could be better."

"Microsoft Azure File Storage is not that easy to use."

"The security could always be modernized."

"It would be good if they added some features that make the solution easier to access for everyone."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They know that the pricing is comparable with Azure, AWS, and those other solutions like Amazon are cheaper, but they are not as flexible."

"It's an inexpensive product."

"I pay for a monthly subscription."

"We don't pay for a Google Cloud Storage subscription."

"The product is subscription-based. When you pay, you will get more storage."

"It's about nearly $10,000 USD to use the services on GCP, however, Google gave us a good deal which is why we originally went with them."

"The solution is very cheap."

"The product pricing is reasonable."

More Google Cloud Storage pricing and cost advice

"The product must improve its price."

"One needs to pay according to the storage they plan to use in the solution. The payments are to be made yearly. It is usually monthly, but we opted for yearly subscriptions in our company."

"The product's pricing need improvement."

"I give the pricing of the solution a seven out of ten."

"The licensing cost for Microsoft Azure File Storage comes with an agreement from Microsoft."

"I think the pricing of the product can be reduced."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being the most expensive. It's not cheap."

"The pricing is usually dependent on your storage requirements. Overall, I believe Microsoft Azure File Storage's price is reasonable."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,597 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

71%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?

It is flexible and simple to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?

The pricing for cloud services, including Google, remains challenging in the Philippines, especially for SMEs. These businesses often find cloud solutions more expensive compared to on-premises opt...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?

The initial setup appears to be the hardest part, although once familiar with it, the process becomes easier. Pricing remains challenging, especially for SMEs, making cloud services costlier than o...

See all answers

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure File Storage?

The product is a reliable cloud solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?

As for the current licensing and payment structure, it's almost pay-as-you-go. Monthly is okay. But maybe we'll get a better price if we have a long-term contract and pay monthly.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 23% of the time

AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 7% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 6% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Competitors

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 49% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 17% of the time

Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 7% of the time

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 1% of the time

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage

November 2024

Download Google Cloud Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage

October 2024

Download Microsoft Azure File Storage product report

Also Known As

No data available

MS Azure File Storage

Learn More

Google

Microsoft

Overview

Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

Key scenarios:

Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
Integrate modern applications with File storage
Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork

Talon, Camden

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage

October 2024

Free Report: Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,597 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.