Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Cloud Storage vs Microsoft Azure File Storage comparison

Google and Microsoft are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Google is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Google holds a 10.6% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Microsoft’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Google Cloud Storage
Read 76 Google Cloud Storage reviews
  • 4,584 Views
  • 3,100 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
Microsoft Azure File Storage
Read 45 Microsoft Azure File Storage reviews
  • 4,234 Views
  • 3,484 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Google Cloud Storage and Microsoft Azure File Storage compete in the storage market. Google Cloud Storage stands out for ease of deployment, while Microsoft Azure File Storage has a stronger feature set and customer support.

Features: Google Cloud Storage offers scalability, durability, and integrated data analytics. Microsoft Azure File Storage provides seamless integration with Windows environments, advanced security features, and hybrid cloud capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage needs better offline support, improved management interface for large datasets, and enhanced usability. Microsoft Azure File Storage users highlight occasional performance lags, a better user experience, and improved documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is praised for a straightforward setup and deployment process, although its customer service could be more responsive. Microsoft Azure File Storage is slightly more complex to deploy but offers robust and responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage is valued for competitive pricing and a transparent cost structure, contributing to a favorable ROI. Microsoft Azure File Storage, though more expensive, justifies the cost through its extensive features and strong support, enhancing overall ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Most users manage independently, but those using Google Cloud Storage support find it professional and efficient, despite occasional delays.
Sentiment score
5.2
Microsoft Azure File Storage support varies in responsiveness and quality, influenced by customer status, location, and type of partnership.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.2
Google Cloud Storage needs enhancements in speed, user experience, security, integration, and flexible storage plans with lower costs.
Sentiment score
4.3
Microsoft Azure File Storage needs enhanced ease of use, pricing clarity, integrations, security features, and improved user experience.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Google Cloud Storage provides scalable and flexible storage solutions, efficiently handling varying workloads and user numbers, though cost concerns exist.
Sentiment score
8.3
Microsoft Azure File Storage is scalable and adaptable for various organization sizes, efficiently handling user needs with dynamic cloud capabilities.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Google Cloud Storage's pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective, offers free tiers, and appeals with discounts in select regions.
No sentiment score available
Microsoft Azure File Storage pricing is variable and less transparent, with potentially higher costs and various additional fees for support and licensing.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Google Cloud Storage is highly stable and reliable, with users praising its consistent performance and smooth integration across locations.
No sentiment score available
Microsoft Azure File Storage is praised for stability and reliability, with users reporting minimal issues and high stability ratings.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.6
Google Cloud Storage is highly valued for scalability, ease of use, security, and seamless integration with diverse business needs.
Sentiment score
8.5
Microsoft Azure File Storage offers flexible, secure, and cost-effective file storage with high availability, seamless integration, and convenient file transfer capabilities.
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Storage (2nd)
Microsoft Azure File Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage is 10.6%, down from 12.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 12.9%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

Akos Szirmai - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers accessibility from various devices and easy to setup
I never intended to use Google Storage. It was just a backup or auxiliary service to my Gmail account. If someone wants to use it, they probably can use it. I am not sure about the corporate environment. But at a personal level, Google Storage supports a lot of functions of the whole Google package, from the calendar, mail, photos, news, and so on. So, anyone who is using this software is definitely using Google Storage in some way. It is about the core usage. So, if someone is looking for a cloud storage solution, I would suggest using it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Read full review
Pmurki@Micron.Com Praveen - PeerSpot reviewer
Setup takes minimal efforts and good product to keep files for our ETL process
We use it for ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes. We get files from different tools related to our micro-processing, copy them into Azure File Storage, and then consume them for parsing and loading It's good overall. We just use Azure File Storage as a way to keep files for our ETL process.…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
72%
Computer Software Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Manufacturing Company
2%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?
It is flexible and simple to use.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?
The pricing for cloud services, including Google, remains challenging in the Philippines, especially for SMEs. These businesses often find cloud solutions more expensive compared to on-premises opt...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?
The initial setup appears to be the hardest part, although once familiar with it, the process becomes easier. Pricing remains challenging, especially for SMEs, making cloud services costlier than o...
See all answers
Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?
Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure File Storage?
The product is a reliable cloud solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?
As for the current licensing and payment structure, it's almost pay-as-you-go. Monthly is okay. But maybe we'll get a better price if we have a long-term contract and pay monthly.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 23% of the time
AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 19% of the time
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 11% of the time
Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 7% of the time
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 6% of the time
More Google Cloud Storage Competitors
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 49% of the time
Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 17% of the time
Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 15% of the time
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 7% of the time
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 1% of the time
More Microsoft Azure File Storage Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage
November 2024
Google Cloud Storage reportDownload Google Cloud Storage product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure File Storage
November 2024
Microsoft Azure File Storage reportDownload Microsoft Azure File Storage product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
MS Azure File Storage
 

Learn More

Google
Microsoft
 

Overview

Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

Key scenarios:

  • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
  • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
  • Integrate modern applications with File storage
  • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data
 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork
Talon, Camden
Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage
October 2024
Free Report: Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.