Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while Microsoft is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 17.1% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Microsoft’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Amazon S3 Glacier

Read 38 Amazon S3 Glacier reviews

4,961 Views
4,255 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Read 51 Microsoft Azure Object Storage reviews

714 Views
628 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Amazon S3 Glacier

Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Amazon S3 Glacier and Microsoft Azure Object Storage are two leading cloud storage solutions. Amazon S3 Glacier generally has the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and customer service, while Microsoft Azure Object Storage leads in features and integration capabilities.

Features: Amazon S3 Glacier offers cost-effective long-term data storage, easy integration with other AWS services, and robust support. Microsoft Azure Object Storage provides comprehensive data management capabilities, seamless integration with various Azure services, and an extensive feature set for complex storage needs.

Room for Improvement: Amazon S3 Glacier could benefit from improved retrieval speeds, more transparent pricing details, and enhanced user interface. Microsoft Azure Object Storage users desire simpler management tools, better documentation, and streamlined billing processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon S3 Glacier is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Microsoft Azure Object Storage, while easy to deploy, gets mixed reviews regarding support, with some users finding it less responsive compared to AWS.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 Glacier is recognized for low setup costs and high ROI due to usage-based pricing and minimal maintenance requirements. Microsoft Azure Object Storage, though more expensive, offers higher ROI for users needing advanced features and integration capabilities, with reported benefits justifying the additional cost for scalable, feature-rich solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3 Glacier

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 Glacier is 17.1%, up from 15.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is 2.0%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

Nov 8, 2023

A powerful hosting service with an extensive code interface

Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand. I had a personal account once, and I was so scared to type in my credit card because I wasn't sure how much I would be charged. At home, I might turn on the VM to test something, and I might be on there for three minutes wondering how much it could cost. The solution might tell you there are so many hours of free usage and a free VM, but it's still scary because you don't know how much it will cost, even if you go over one second. The price structure needs massive simplifying and made crystal clear so people know what they're paying.

Read full review

DanBryant

Owner at DataHoist

Aug 9, 2024

Good SLAs and better suited for large files like videos and anything in the multi-gigabyte range

Support's not great, but Microsoft products are much more industrial strength and enterprise ready than any other services out there. That's why we use them and learn how to use them, even when they change things without much advanced notice. We proactively educate ourselves on how to use it once it's changed. I don't pay for premium support. But at a basic level, Microsoft products can be pretty aggravating to work with. I prefer not to rate it. I don't think a number would accurately describe the experience. We still use it, and it's still valuable. But the experience with Microsoft products, from storage to Teams and everything else, can be quite aggravating.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is the most feature-rich platform."

"The main advantage of Glacier is its low cost. It is incredibly cheaper than other storage options, especially for objects you don't access frequently. Glacier would add value if you have a staging area for objects you only need to access occasionally. Since we have data in terabytes between S3 buckets, we can significantly reduce our storage and cost footprint by using Glacier."

"The pricing is low, and it's dedicated to archiving is valuable to us."

"Data retrieval, security, compliance, and storage archiving are the most valuable features of Amazon S3 Glacier."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly stable solution."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is easy to use. The platform is straightforward, and the interfaces are user-friendly and responsive. Even with a limited budget, you can train someone without an AWS certification to use it. With on-the-job training, you can ensure they understand what needs to be done to use the service."

"The solution is secure."

"I like the price. If you compare Glacier to others, the prices in terms of what you store beyond retention are much lower."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pros

"We have had a good experience with customer service and support."

"The tool's maintenance is not complex."

"We can easily create a storage layer in any system."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the tool's price since it is not expensive."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is its ease of use."

"The solution offers good documentation."

"It is easy to use, and we use it for backup and remote desktop access. It is working fine."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage pros

Cons

"The solution's pricing is too expensive and could be improved."

"The product’s pricing must be improved."

"Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand."

"Although Amazon S3 Glacier is cheap, its data retrieval cost is very high compared to other solutions."

"I would like to see improved storage capacity and enhanced security features for better protection."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a cheaper tool if you're running it on-prem, but it is expensive if deployed on the cloud."

"I am unsure if the product provides good integration capabilities. From an improvement perspective, I want the tool to provide easier integration features."

"The solution’s deployment process is complex and could be improved."

More Amazon S3 Glacier cons

"I have no complaints about Microsoft Azure Object Storage, but maybe its market size could be more extensive, and its backup speed enhanced."

"It would be great if Microsoft could provide rule-based auto-scaling."

"I would like to have out-of-the-box connectors to make integration with other products easier."

"They could improve AI and ML-based modules. They should add more modules based on artificial intelligence and machine learning. Pricing is a little bit tricky with Microsoft Azure. They do provide the estimates, but it is not easy to guess the exact amount that we will be billed after a month or two because it is based on usage. This is a little confusing."

"The stability of the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"Microsoft Azure Object Storage has had a number of failures last week due to the lack of hardware available to support the resources. However, it was only for a short time, approximately two days."

"The initial setup is not easy to understand."

"The solution can be quite slow."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is too expensive."

"There is no license, you pay for what you use."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is not an expensive solution, and it has a pay-as-you-go pricing model."

"The pricing must be improved."

"I've operated with Amazon S3 Glacier in two modes. Firstly, there's the trial mode, where I experimented with the platform, learned its functionalities, and applied it to my work. Secondly, there's the corporate account mode, where my team handles the operations, and I receive billing reports."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"The price point at which the product is available is pretty good."

"Amazon S3 Glacier has good pricing."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pricing and cost advice

"The cost of this solution is high compared to others, although there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The tool's licensing costs are annual. It should be made reasonable."

"Encryption feature is an add-on."

"You can download the application from Microsoft free of charge."

"The pricing is competitive."

"We don't need to pay for the solution's license."

"For the cloud, you get charges every day if you are going to download anything, besides the cost for storage those charges are always there."

"The cost is based on the amount of traffic and we paid approximately 18 lakh Rupees ($25,000 USD) last year."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

34%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

University

Computer Software Company

21%

Retailer

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, whi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon S3 Glacier?

I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier?

The product could be improved in terms of the customer support team's response times.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Object Storage?

The layout of Microsoft is professional.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Object Storage?

The pricing is higher than CNC. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the pricing as six to seven.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Object Storage?

The deployment process needs improvement, and it requires a lot of expertise to use and to utilize it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 46% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 9% of the time

Wasabi vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 8% of the time

More Amazon S3 Glacier Competitors

Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Compared 49% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Compared 30% of the time

Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Compared 21% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier

November 2024

Download Amazon S3 Glacier product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Object Storage

November 2024

Download Microsoft Azure Object Storage product report

Also Known As

Amazon Glacier

Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage

Learn More

Video not available

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Microsoft

Overview

Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud

Store infrequently accessed data in a low-cost cool storage tier
Store frequently accessed application data in a hot storage tier
Stream video, audio, and other media to web, mobile, or desktop applications
Power big data analytics
Access your data more securely, both over the wire and at rest

Sample Customers

King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud

Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage

October 2024

Free Report: Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.