Amazon S3 Glacier and Microsoft Azure Object Storage are two leading cloud storage solutions. Amazon S3 Glacier generally has the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and customer service, while Microsoft Azure Object Storage leads in features and integration capabilities.
Features: Amazon S3 Glacier offers cost-effective long-term data storage, easy integration with other AWS services, and robust support. Microsoft Azure Object Storage provides comprehensive data management capabilities, seamless integration with various Azure services, and an extensive feature set for complex storage needs.
Room for Improvement: Amazon S3 Glacier could benefit from improved retrieval speeds, more transparent pricing details, and enhanced user interface. Microsoft Azure Object Storage users desire simpler management tools, better documentation, and streamlined billing processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon S3 Glacier is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Microsoft Azure Object Storage, while easy to deploy, gets mixed reviews regarding support, with some users finding it less responsive compared to AWS.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 Glacier is recognized for low setup costs and high ROI due to usage-based pricing and minimal maintenance requirements. Microsoft Azure Object Storage, though more expensive, offers higher ROI for users needing advanced features and integration capabilities, with reported benefits justifying the additional cost for scalable, feature-rich solutions.
If AWS improves support and cost management, there would be fewer reasons for users to consider other cloud platforms.
There is room for improvement in providing more skilled and comprehensive solutions.
They provide documentation and resolve issues.
If I want to change something on my resources or directly access it via the portal, there is not a service level agreement of 100%, and sometimes it's quite difficult to access.
Amazon S3 Glacier auto-scales according to the data.
Glacier has excellent scalability, with elasticity and security that meet industry standards.
Amazon S3 Glacier is infinitely scalable, with no issues on our end.
The storage is very scalable, so you can effortlessly scale it.
It is specifically designed for cold storage.
Amazon S3 Glacier is quite stable, nine out of ten.
I would rate the stability of Glacier for archival purposes at around eight out of ten.
Another improvement is making Glacier available in all regions.
Support could be more robust, with a focus on providing comprehensive solutions even for novel issues.
I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage.
Compared to competitors like GCP, AWS can work on reducing hidden costs and overall pricing to retain startups and medium-sized businesses.
The storage cost is minimal, which is beneficial for archival purposes.
While it's generally cost-effective, the pricing model could be clearer.
It's a pay-per-use solution and a good idea for proof of concept and value.
Glacier greatly helps in managing storage costs by moving historical data to a lower-cost storage option.
These features facilitate log management and data dumping since the service is versatile enough to handle large volumes of data and provide necessary security.
The most valuable features of Amazon S3 Glacier are its cost-effectiveness for data archiving and its durability.
The ability to store everything inside Blob or Object storage and use it for archiving data is beneficial.
Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.
REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
