Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon S3 vs Amazon S3 Glacier comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Amazon S3 support is generally well-rated for its professionalism, despite some delay reports, with extensive documentation aiding management.
No sentiment score available
Amazon S3 Glacier support is praised for efficiency and knowledge, but some find it unresponsive or costly without premium service.
An engineer is assigned based on the severity of the issue.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.8
Amazon S3's interface challenges user experience with complexity, security, performance, and pricing issues, needing improved management and integration features.
No sentiment score available
Amazon S3 Glacier needs faster retrieval, enhanced integration, cost transparency, improved user experience, security, and GDPR compliance improvements.
An improvement could be associating the naming with personal accounts, allowing more familiar or desired names without conflicting with global conventions.
The practice of protecting data could be more streamlined or mandatory.
In terms of security, I struggled with setting permissions and access control initially.
I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Amazon S3 offers scalable, flexible storage with strong security, though learning curve and costs may concern some users across sectors.
No sentiment score available
Amazon S3 Glacier is highly scalable with seamless data auto-scaling, easy integration, and widely praised for its reliability.
Data placed in an S3 bucket is replicated across availability zones in a region, ensuring scalability and availability.
Amazon S3 is easily scalable and performs better compared to other cloud storage solutions.
Amazon S3's automatic scaling has benefited me, as I don't need to plan storage requirements.
Amazon S3 Glacier auto-scales according to the data.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.6
Amazon S3's pay-as-you-go pricing is cost-effective but may increase with data retrievals and higher usage scenarios.
Sentiment score
7.8
Amazon S3 Glacier offers cost-effective storage with a complex pricing model, leading to concerns over unexpected expenses and comparisons to on-premises options.
I've used the free tier and haven't been charged yet.
S3 offers multiple classes, allowing you to move data to cheaper classes for cost savings.
It is somewhat justified due to the benefits, but there is room for reconsideration.
While it's generally cost-effective, the pricing model could be clearer.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Amazon S3 is highly reliable for large companies, though users note minor issues with data management and security configuration.
Sentiment score
8.5
Amazon S3 Glacier is highly stable with excellent reliability, minimal downtime, and recommended monitoring for effective deployment management.
Transitioning between S3 storage classes, like moving data from the standard class to Glacier or Glacier Deep Archive, has been challenging.
Amazon S3 is highly stable.
Amazon S3 Glacier is quite stable, nine out of ten.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Amazon S3 excels in availability, scalability, security, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use, making it ideal for data storage.
Sentiment score
7.5
Amazon S3 Glacier provides cost-effective, scalable, and secure data archiving with seamless S3 integration and efficient data retrieval.
I appreciate its capability to create static websites and integrate with services like CloudFront, EC2, and DynamoDB.
Its stability and scalability are also impressive, as it allows for increased storage space according to demand.
The most valuable feature of Amazon S3 for me is static deployment; it doesn't charge much, and I can integrate CloudFront for DNS and routing.
The most valuable features of Amazon S3 Glacier are its cost-effectiveness for data archiving and its durability.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
79
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Amazon S3 Glacier
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 is 11.3%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Amazon S3 Glacier is 17.1%, up from 15.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

HenryAragon - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers different tiers, enable encryption but there's a lot of complexity
The best thing about S3 is the security. I can enable encryption at rest using a KMS server, a key management server. Key management servers encrypt data, and you need the key to decrypt it. Without the key, you can't access the data. Amazon allows you to use your own servers or theirs. They offer Amazon encryption, which you decide on when you create the bucket. The bucket also has all the other features like versioning. We can do versioning and life cycles. The biggest plus for me as a storage admin is the different tiers: standard, infrequent access, Glacier, and Glacier Deep Archive. The differences between these tiers are cost and data retrieval speed. Standard tier data is considered "hot," meaning it's accessible anytime, but it's expensive. If you want to archive data you won't need often, or if you have ample time to retrieve a backup, the most cost-effective option is Glacier Deep Archive. It's very cheap, but the disadvantage is that when you request data, it takes up to 24 hours to become accessible. There are no limitations on how much you can store, but the biggest limitation is that you cannot use Glacier Deep Archive from the console. You can't go into the AWS console and copy something directly into Deep Glacier, but you can do it from the command line. If you have programmatic access, there's a command to put data directly into Glacier Deep Archive. We don't use anything AI on AWS right now. The AI stuff isn't really too useful for us yet. We're just playing around with Copilot from Microsoft, which is more on the Azure side. We haven't leveraged any AWS AI stuff yet. We've basically just been playing around with Amazon Bedrock, but haven't done anything in production with it.
Alan Bloor - PeerSpot reviewer
A powerful hosting service with an extensive code interface
Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand. I had a personal account once, and I was so scared to type in my credit card because I wasn't sure how much I would be charged. At home, I might turn on the VM to test something, and I might be on there for three minutes wondering how much it could cost. The solution might tell you there are so many hours of free usage and a free VM, but it's still scary because you don't know how much it will cost, even if you go over one second. The price structure needs massive simplifying and made crystal clear so people know what they're paying.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
75%
Computer Software Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Manufacturing Company
2%
Educational Organization
34%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
6%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon S3?
We can easily connect to the AWS resources.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon S3?
The licensing model is complex. If you need your backup data available at all times, but don't access it frequently, there are better options. You could go with S3, but other vendors offer the same...
What needs improvement with Amazon S3?
There's a lot of complexity, but that's unavoidable because it needs to be versatile. You have to be able to get the data in many different ways. For example, if you need to give just one file to s...
Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, whi...
What do you like most about Amazon S3 Glacier?
I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done ...
What needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier?
The product could be improved in terms of the customer support team's response times.
 

Also Known As

S3, Simple Storage Service
Amazon Glacier
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. Amazon S3 Glacier and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.