Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AT&T Cloud Storage vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

AT&T Cloud Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
17th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of AT&T Cloud Storage is 2.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is 2.0%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

Use AT&T Cloud Storage?
Share your opinion
DanBryant - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 9, 2024
Good SLAs and better suited for large files like videos and anything in the multi-gigabyte range
Support's not great, but Microsoft products are much more industrial strength and enterprise ready than any other services out there. That's why we use them and learn how to use them, even when they change things without much advanced notice. We proactively educate ourselves on how to use it once it's changed. I don't pay for premium support. But at a basic level, Microsoft products can be pretty aggravating to work with. I prefer not to rate it. I don't think a number would accurately describe the experience. We still use it, and it's still valuable. But the experience with Microsoft products, from storage to Teams and everything else, can be quite aggravating.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Encryption feature is an add-on."
"The pricing is competitive."
"I'm not aware of the licensing cost, as my customer handles it. In Taiwan, it's reasonably priced."
"You can download the application from Microsoft free of charge."
"It has a pay-as-you-go model. So, you are only paying for what you store. It's an attractive model. You don't pay for a set; you pay for what you actually use."
"For the cloud, you get charges every day if you are going to download anything, besides the cost for storage those charges are always there."
"The cost should be reduced to make it more competitive."
"The price will be more competitive when we increase the time spent using the tool. For our company's size range, I think the price is okay."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
13%
University
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
21%
Retailer
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The pricing is higher than CNC. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the pricing as six to seven.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The deployment process needs improvement, and it requires a lot of expertise to use and to utilize it.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google, Microsoft and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.