Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 in CS , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 8.7% mindshare in the category. Oracle is ranked #11 in PCSS , with an average rating of 8.6, and holds a 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Read 15 Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) reviews

1,325 Views
1,161 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Read 6 Oracle Cloud Object Storage reviews

1,029 Views
953 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Google, Nasuni and others in Cloud Storage.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Storage Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (4th), File and Object Storage (8th)

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Public Cloud Storage Services (11th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Cloud Services solutions, they serve different purposes. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is designed for Cloud Storage and holds a mindshare of 8.7%, down 10.4% compared to last year.
Oracle Cloud Object Storage, on the other hand, focuses on Public Cloud Storage Services, holds 4.3% mindshare, up 4.1% since last year.

Cloud Storage

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

Auto-scaling capabilities enhance file management while reducing downtime

The most valuable feature of Amazon EFS is its auto-scaling capability. It's really easy to configure EFS by just creating it and running a command to directly configure it with my servers. It supports unlimited use, and charges are applied based on the file usage at the end of the month. The solution offers reduced downtime and increased durability through its auto-scaling features.

Read full review

PriyankShrivastava

Sr Quality Engineer at Accenture

A workhorse that enables high availability but support has room for improvement

There is always room for improvement. When a product is marketed, many claims are made, but in reality, it does not always perform as expected. The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced. The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Elastic File Systems allow me to share data, provision, and manage capacity and performance in AWS."

"We haven't seen any downtime or challenges when using the services."

"I appreciate Amazon's extensive range of services, which makes it a favorable choice."

"We can run code and deploy it whenever we want."

"The most beneficial feature of the product for data storage stems from the fact that it serves as a shared file storage."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations."

"The solution is scalable."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) pros

"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."

"We use it mostly in the cloud. It is stable, requires high availability, and works with large datasets seamlessly."

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage is valuable for storing unstructured data, such as text documents and word documents."

"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."

"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."

"The technical support for the solution was very nice."

"It is stable, requires high availability, and works with large datasets seamlessly."

Cons

"Around 80 percent of the features of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) are available on Linux and not in Windows, making it a major drawback of the product."

"There are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption."

"The deployment is definitely not an easy process."

"Specifically, when it comes to the file system for the learning system, we encountered performance issues with both Azure and AWS."

"Its deployment process could be faster while installing the Python package directly into the environment."

"It should be simplified. There are people who don't have cloud experience. It should be storage that we are able to just connect to."

"The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3."

"The user activity needs to be more connected."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) cons

"Cost-wise, it is not an affordable tool if you allocate space, and try to use it some other day."

"The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced."

"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."

"The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response."

"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."

"I could not find a load balancer in OCI similar to the support provided by Microsoft Azure and AWS."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing 7 out of 10."

"The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3. For one GB or ten GB of data, S3 is much cheaper. EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage."

"It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."

"Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) offers a pay-as-you-go model, so whenever you use its services, you need to pay."

"The product charges are based on the amount of data stored."

"The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment."

"During the billing cycle, if I use the tool only for a day, I still need to pay you for a month."

"We have a yearly subscription for the product."

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage might not be that expensive compared to on-premises solutions."

"Disaster recovery (DR) can be expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

18%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?

The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?

The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3. For one GB or ten GB of data, S3 is much cheaper. EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

It is an expensive product. We do not use a monthly plan; instead, we opt for a quarterly or semi-annual licensing model, which we negotiate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 57% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 9% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 7% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 1% of the time

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 50% of the time

Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Database Backup Service vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 10% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 9% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

February 2025

Download Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

January 2025

Download Oracle Cloud Object Storage product report

Overview

Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.

When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.

It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend

Brinks

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Google, Nasuni and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.