Google Cloud Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

Google and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Google is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7. Google holds a 9.9% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Storage

Read 78 Google Cloud Storage reviews

3,915 Views
2,456 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Read 6 Oracle Cloud Object Storage reviews

1,004 Views
910 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Storage

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Google Cloud Storage and Oracle Cloud Object Storage are prominent cloud storage solutions with distinct strengths. Users tend to prefer Google Cloud Storage for its comprehensive features and ease of deployment, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage impresses with its high performance and ROI.

Features: Google Cloud Storage is praised for its scalability, data management, and integration capabilities. Oracle Cloud Object Storage is noted for its performance, security features, and reliability.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage users suggest enhancing support services and reducing complexity in navigating services. Oracle Cloud Object Storage receives feedback for improving documentation and lowering costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is favored for its straightforward deployment process and extensive documentation. Oracle Cloud Object Storage, while robust, demands more technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage offers competitive pricing and an appealing ROI. Oracle Cloud Object Storage, though more expensive, delivers higher performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,161 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (2nd)

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage is 9.9%, down from 11.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Cloud Object Storage is 4.1%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Manimaran Tannimalai

Managing Partner at Cloud Analytics Sdn Bhd

User interface consistency facilitates seamless project planning and design for specialized tasks

While Google has made efforts to address SAP loads, the company lacks a product specialist focus. They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches. Google's strength lies in their adapted approach to specific tasks, as seen with SAP loads. Generally, their focus is widespread.

Read full review

PriyankShrivastava

Sr Quality Engineer at Accenture

A workhorse that enables high availability but support has room for improvement

There is always room for improvement. When a product is marketed, many claims are made, but in reality, it does not always perform as expected. The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced. The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the ease and accessibility of information."

"The solution operates in the background and it is attached to my Gmail account. When I download files to my phone, such as pictures, they automatically go to Google Cloud Storage."

"Google Cloud was cheaper compared to AWS and Azure."

"One of the most valuable features of the solution is its ease of use."

"What I like about this program, is that it's quite fast, because you pay for your usage."

"Google Cloud Storage has proven most valuable for our data management needs due to its bandwidth speed for backing up and restoring data."

"Google Cloud Storage includes Docs, calendar, Gmail, Google Drive, and Google Meet."

"It is easy to use."

More Google Cloud Storage pros

"We use it mostly in the cloud. It is stable, requires high availability, and works with large datasets seamlessly."

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage is valuable for storing unstructured data, such as text documents and word documents."

"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."

"The technical support for the solution was very nice."

"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."

"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."

"It is stable, requires high availability, and works with large datasets seamlessly."

Cons

"Google Cloud Storage could be improved if they provided more free storage for free accounts."

"The solution could always be more user-friendly."

"I would also like to be able to use my own tools and packages within this solution and also have a tool to visualize the data with graphics."

"Protection is an area in the product where improvements are required."

"This solution could be improved by increasing integration with other tools, like Microsoft."

"The product's user interface is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Google Cloud Storage could improve by increasing the storage from 15 GB. If I want to have more storage I need to pay extra money."

"Its security should be better from the data security point of view. It should be more secure, and it should get tightly integrated with products such as Google Docs and Google Sheets. Microsoft covers different kinds of tools such as Microsoft Office, Microsoft Word, and Microsoft Excel."

More Google Cloud Storage cons

"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."

"The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced."

"I could not find a load balancer in OCI similar to the support provided by Microsoft Azure and AWS."

"The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response."

"Cost-wise, it is not an affordable tool if you allocate space, and try to use it some other day."

"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you want a shared file system, you have to buy a server with the minimum capacity of one TB."

"I just use the free storage that comes with Gmail. I have 15 gigabytes."

"We pay a monthly subscription."

"The solution comes with a cost once a person has exceeded a certain limit."

"There is no license to use Google Cloud Storage."

"I pay a yearly subscription fee."

"In general, it's fairly priced."

"The product is subscription-based. When you pay, you will get more storage."

More Google Cloud Storage pricing and cost advice

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage might not be that expensive compared to on-premises solutions."

"During the billing cycle, if I use the tool only for a day, I still need to pay you for a month."

"We have a yearly subscription for the product."

"Disaster recovery (DR) can be expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

74%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?

It is flexible and simple to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?

Google Cloud ( /products/google-cloud-reviews ) was cheaper compared to AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) and Azure ( /products/microsoft-azure-reviews ). AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) wa...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

It is an expensive product. We do not use a monthly plan; instead, we opt for a quarterly or semi-annual licensing model, which we negotiate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

See all answers

Comparisons

AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 10% of the time

Zadara vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 2% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 48% of the time

Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Database Backup Service vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 10% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage

March 2025

Download Google Cloud Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

February 2025

Download Oracle Cloud Object Storage product report

Overview

Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

Google

Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

Oracle

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork

Brinks

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

March 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.