Apache Kafka and Amazon MSK compete in the real-time data streaming category. Amazon MSK has the upper hand with its managed infrastructure and integration with AWS services, simplifying management tasks for businesses.
Features: Apache Kafka provides high throughput data processing, supports diverse programming languages, and benefits from a strong community. Amazon MSK offers seamless AWS integration, automated management, and comprehensive monitoring capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Apache Kafka could improve by offering more management simplicity and reducing configuration complexity. Enhanced documentation and native managed cloud capabilities could be beneficial. Amazon MSK might improve by expanding its integration capabilities beyond the AWS ecosystem, providing more transparent cost structures, and offering more granular scaling options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon MSK eases deployment with automation and provides robust AWS customer support. Apache Kafka requires more configuration expertise, leveraging support from third-party vendors or internal teams for deployment, which allows for custom implementations.
Pricing and ROI: Apache Kafka, being open-source, has lower initial costs but can incur higher maintenance expenses, with ROI dependent on available technical resources. Amazon MSK offers usage-based pricing within AWS, potentially enhancing ROI through decreased resource requirements and operational risks.
Amazon's support is excellent.
There is plenty of community support available online.
The Apache community provides support for the open-source version.
The functionality for scaling comes out of the box and is very effective.
Customers have not faced issues with user growth or data streaming needs.
Apache Kafka is stable.
The increase in cloud costs by 50% to 60% does not justify the savings.
The performance angle is critical, and while it works in milliseconds, the goal is to move towards microseconds.
We are always trying to find the best configs, which is a challenge.
A more user-friendly interface and better management consoles with improved documentation could be beneficial.
Once we started using Kafka, our cloud costs rose by 50% to 60%.
The open-source version of Apache Kafka results in minimal costs, mainly linked to accessing documentation and limited support.
Its pricing is reasonable.
The scalability and usability are quite remarkable.
Apache Kafka is effective when dealing with large volumes of data flowing at high speeds, requiring real-time processing.
It allows the use of data in motion, allowing data to propagate from one source to another while it is in motion.
Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (Amazon MSK) is a fully managed service that enables you to build and run applications that use Apache Kafka to process streaming data. Amazon MSK provides the control-plane operations, such as those for creating, updating, and deleting clusters.
Apache Kafka is an open-source distributed streaming platform that serves as a central hub for handling real-time data streams. It allows efficient publishing, subscribing, and processing of data from various sources like applications, servers, and sensors.
Kafka's core benefits include high scalability for big data pipelines, fault tolerance ensuring continuous operation despite node failures, low latency for real-time applications, and decoupling of data producers from consumers.
Key features include topics for organizing data streams, producers for publishing data, consumers for subscribing to data, brokers for managing clusters, and connectors for easy integration with various data sources.
Large organizations use Kafka for real-time analytics, log aggregation, fraud detection, IoT data processing, and facilitating communication between microservices.
We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
