Amazon QuickSight vs Sigma comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Sigma Computing are both solutions in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.5, while Sigma Computing is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 7.3% mindshare in BIT, compared to Sigma Computing’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 63% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sigma Computing users who would recommend it.

Amazon QuickSight

Read 29 Amazon QuickSight reviews

9,571 Views
8,826 Comparison Views

63% willing to recommend

Sigma

Read 4 Sigma reviews

1,421 Views
645 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon QuickSight

Sigma

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Amazon QuickSight and Sigma compete in business analytics, each catering to diverse organizational needs. Amazon QuickSight is preferred for its pricing and ROI, while Sigma is noted for its strong feature set, making it a valued choice for its higher cost.

Features: Amazon QuickSight offers seamless AWS integration, machine learning insights, and serverless architecture. Sigma provides a spreadsheet-like interface, real-time data collaboration, and advanced data modeling capabilities. Amazon QuickSight's edge is AWS integration, and Sigma's strengths are flexibility and collaboration features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sigma's cloud-native deployment ensures quick setup and integration with databases, emphasizing collaborative data exploration. Amazon QuickSight benefits from its AWS integration but may require more technical support for extensive setups. Both offer reliable customer service, though Sigma encourages direct engagement due to its collaborative approach.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon QuickSight is noted for its lower setup cost with pay-per-session pricing, enhancing ROI for variable usage businesses. Sigma, with a higher setup cost, offers significant long-term value through its comprehensive features, appealing to companies focusing on detailed data analysis. Amazon QuickSight is cost-effective, while Sigma's ROI stems from capability enhancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon QuickSight vs. Sigma Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight vs. Sigma

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon QuickSight

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sigma

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Visualization (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon QuickSight is 7.3%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sigma is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

Featured Reviews

Mohd Farhan

AWS Cloud Solution Developer | DevOps | SpringBoot | Android/iOS at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Has seamless data filtering and visualization for client satisfaction

One area for improvement is the cost, as it's a bit expensive. The caching mechanism also charges too much if I need to cache any data. Sometimes it takes time to display data, suggesting a need for enhancement in data visualization speed. Additionally, the role-level security is challenging to implement, and it could be improved to allow access control per department more easily.

Read full review

Erik Jones

Head of BI and Analytics at HyperScience

Streamlines reporting; like Excel on steroids

I think Sigma's dashboarding has room for improvement. They have a relatively limited number of visuals that you can use and sometimes I have a need for visualizations outside of the offerings that they have. I would like to see better visualization options. That would allow me to build out more visually pleasing dashboarding in Sigma.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the user interface."

"It works well with the AWS ecosystem."

"It has a lot of valuable features, but the most important aspect is the affordable cost. This solution costs much less in comparison to the competitors like Qlik Sense, Power BI, and Tableau."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon QuickSight is its connectivity with other Amazon services."

"The most valuable feature I have found is the low-level securities are very easy to use."

"Amazon QuickSight can provide insights from the available data. It supports various rule types. We get the options of machine learning and insights, which are not available in other intelligence tools. It is easier to use, more stable, and cheaper than other solutions."

"The ease with which it integrates with different data sources is most valuable. Especially when everything is on AWS, it is easy to connect to the data source and organize different dashboards."

"Compared to other reporting tools, it is very effective but does require an understanding of certain concepts in QuickSight. This understanding is crucial for creating dimensions, changing metrics, and visualizing reports."

More Amazon QuickSight pros

"I find the collaborative features, such as commenting, to be very valuable."

"The most valuable aspect for me is having real-time data."

"Sigma is a great software for non-technical business users. If someone's familiar with pivot tables or Excel or Google Sheets, they should be able to pick up Sigma pretty quickly. There is a very low bar for onboarding."

"The tool's interface is easy to use. The functions listed as a part of the menu items are easy to use."

Cons

"The cost of queries is very high."

"The solution must be more user-friendly."

"It's not ideal for reports that are more complex."

"There could be an end-to-end pipeline for data cleaning as well as presenting it using different visualizations."

"The product has some storage and SPICE data issues."

"You can't tell a data story as well in QuickSight as you can on others, especially in TIBCO Spotfire."

"There should be better connectors for different data sets."

"They could provide more options for graphics and other features."

More Amazon QuickSight cons

"The only minor area for improvement lies in handling highly complex visualizations."

"Sigma lacks a versioning feature to track changes. There is a need for better structuring, like a folder system, to organize diagrams efficiently."

"The product's roadmap regarding introducing new features in the solution or new versions of the tool can be made better in the future."

"I would like to see better visualization options. That would allow me to build out more visually pleasing dashboarding in Sigma."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is simpler and cheaper than other solutions."

"I wouldn't say that it is an expensive product, but to stay competitive they would need to bring down the prices."

"Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments."

"A highly affordable cost structure with fixed membership and timeframe basis options."

"I'm using a paid version of Amazon QuickSight, paying about $22 monthly. As I have yet to learn about the pricing for other tools, such as Power BI, I won't be able to compare."

"The solution's pricing is cheaper than the other products in the market."

"I rate the price of Amazon QuickSight a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"The solution is not affordable."

More Amazon QuickSight pricing and cost advice

"The retail price is set at one thousand dollars per creator per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon QuickSight?

The integration is very seamless. We stored our result CSV files in S3 and connected directly from there.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon QuickSight?

Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments. However, this cost is offset by the advantages it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon QuickSight?

See all answers

What do you like most about Sigma?

The tool's interface is easy to use. The functions listed as a part of the menu items are easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sigma?

The viewer license is free, and the available licenses are for creators. The retail price is set at one thousand dollars per creator per year. Additionally, there is a platform fee of thirty thousa...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sigma?

I have used the product on the cloud and the browser and found no issues with it. The product's roadmap regarding introducing new features in the solution or new versions of the tool can be made be...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 27% of the time

Tableau vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 19% of the time

Looker Studio vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 12% of the time

Qlik Sense vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 7% of the time

Looker vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon QuickSight Competitors

Hex vs Sigma

Compared 41% of the time

Apache Superset vs Sigma

Compared 21% of the time

Tableau vs Sigma

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Sigma

Compared 10% of the time

Domo vs Sigma

Compared 5% of the time

More Sigma Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight

February 2025

Download Amazon QuickSight product report

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

January 2025

Download Sigma product report

Also Known As

QuickSight

No data available

Overview

Amazon QuickSight is a fast, cloud-powered business analytics service that makes it easy to build visualizations, perform ad-hoc analysis, and quickly get business insights from your data. Using our cloud-based service you can easily connect to your data, perform advanced analysis, and create stunning visualizations and rich dashboards that can be accessed from any browser or mobile device.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sigma is the next-generation of analytics for cloud data warehouses with a familiar spreadsheet-like interface that gives business experts the power to ask any question of their data no matter the query.

Sigma Computing

Sample Customers

MLB Advanced Media, Infor, HotelBeds, Gemini, Jivochat, Edmunds.com

Snowflake, Fivetran ,Autodesk, Flowspace, Super League Gaming, Zumper, Clover, Volta, Olivela

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight vs. Sigma

January 2025

Free Report: Amazon QuickSight vs. Sigma

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon QuickSight vs. Sigma and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon QuickSight vs. Sigma report.

See our list of best BI (Business Intelligence) Tools vendors.

We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.