Amazon QuickSight vs Looker comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3 in BIT , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 7.2% mindshare in the category. Google is ranked #5 in EBT , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 9.3% mindshare. Additionally, 63% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon QuickSight

Read 29 Amazon QuickSight reviews

7,786 Views
7,232 Comparison Views

63% willing to recommend

Looker

Read 19 Looker reviews

1,537 Views
1,260 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Amazon QuickSight

Looker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon QuickSight and Looker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed BI (Business Intelligence) Tools Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon QuickSight

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (3rd)

Looker

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Embedded BI (5th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Business Intelligence solutions, they serve different purposes. Amazon QuickSight is designed for BI (Business Intelligence) Tools and holds a mindshare of 7.2%, down 10.8% compared to last year.
Looker, on the other hand, focuses on Embedded BI, holds 9.3% mindshare, down 11.9% since last year.

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

Embedded BI

Featured Reviews

Mohd Farhan

AWS Cloud Solution Developer | DevOps | SpringBoot | Android/iOS at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Has seamless data filtering and visualization for client satisfaction

One area for improvement is the cost, as it's a bit expensive. The caching mechanism also charges too much if I need to cache any data. Sometimes it takes time to display data, suggesting a need for enhancement in data visualization speed. Additionally, the role-level security is challenging to implement, and it could be improved to allow access control per department more easily.

Read full review

Kishore Jhunjhunwala

Sr Analytics Consultant at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

A cloud solution for operational reporting but is expensive

Some basic feature that is available in other reporting tools is missing. Looker has the ability to show more than 5,000 rows for operational reporting. Some reporting tools allow users to scroll down to see more than 5,000 rows, but in Looker, you have to download the entire dataset. Looker should consider adding a scroll-down option to allow users to view large datasets on screen without downloading them. Looker has some options for granting users access as viewers. However, viewers cannot download the entire dataset. Only superusers can download the whole dataset on the Explore screen. This is a big limitation, as you cannot give any user viewer access. You can give access to superuser access, which is a cost to the company.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Efficiency has definitely improved, and the speed of developing analytics and insights has increased by at least twenty percent."

"It works well with the AWS ecosystem."

"I like that with Amazon QuickSight, you don't need to install an app to use its services. With other BI tools, you need to install the app, so Amazon QuickSight is better for me in this area."

"The solution is simple to implement."

"The best part about Amazon QuickSight is the filtration capability."

"A valuable feature of Amazon QuickSight is that it's a cloud-native service provided by AWS. As all platforms within my company run on AWS, that's the leverage of Amazon QuickSight. Amazon QuickSight is also easy to use, and I find the native connectors from AWS valuable as well."

"Easily able to connect with our other services and easy to manage."

"It is notably fast in handling large data set refreshes, making it efficient for data analysis."

More Amazon QuickSight pros

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. I didn't face any issues with stability."

"From a developer's perspective, the way the functionality's being handled is great."

"It's quite effortless to navigate through various applications and review their updated data in real-time."

"The product is easy to use."

"With Looker, I have experienced benefits in terms of usability and shareability."

"It is a pretty stable solution because it is a cloud-based product."

"Looker allows you to generate the most optimal SQL queries in a DC through UI actions. We had signed a contract with Google Cloud to use BigQuery. That was the primary reason we adopted Looker. It works better with BigQuery than any other BI platform. We also like how this tool was developed. It was designed with an eye toward microservices architecture."

"The stability of Looker has been good since I have been using it. However, it depends on what components are being used."

More Looker pros

Cons

"Lacked connectivity with other third-party tools and data sources."

"They could provide more options for graphics and other features."

"I would like to see a feature that allows us to save a draft version before making it public and publishing it."

"Amazon QuickSight's visualization could be improved."

"The product has some storage and SPICE data issues."

"Right now, you can't use Amazon QuickSight on other cloud providers, so I'd like it to have availability on other cloud providers. This is an area for improvement in the product. What I'd like to see in Amazon QuickSight in the future is a distributed centralized system where I can manage all reports in one place, and for Amazon QuickSight to become reporting as a service."

"One area where Amazon QuickSight could improve is its formatting features for dashboards."

"The number of features in the product is limited in comparison with the other tools in the market, like Power BI."

More Amazon QuickSight cons

"It needs to be more user-friendly."

"Stability needs improvement."

"Looker doesn't connect to Excel, which is a huge disappointment because a lot of data is presented in Excel. Also, it can't consume data directly from REST APIs, which is necessary. Looker needs to expand its horizons when it comes to data sources. The inability to connect to different data sources is hampering our use cases. Currently, it only has an ODBC connection that connects to a database. It needs to connect to other data sources, such as Excel, APIs, and different platforms."

"The visualization capability of the product is limited."

"The integration with different databases must be improved."

"The main area of concern in Looker is probably related to blending the data from the different sources, including the data present internally in the company and on the cloud."

"The product does not have documented material."

"Integrations with other BI tools could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's affordable compared to other long-term contractor business tools available in the market."

"I'm using a paid version of Amazon QuickSight, paying about $22 monthly. As I have yet to learn about the pricing for other tools, such as Power BI, I won't be able to compare."

"I wouldn't say that it is an expensive product, but to stay competitive they would need to bring down the prices."

"The pricing is cost-effective with a good plan."

"The solution is not affordable."

"A highly affordable cost structure with fixed membership and timeframe basis options."

"Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments."

"The Amazon QuickSight licensing model my company's on is pay-as-you-go, but I wouldn't be able to give the figures because that's handled by the finance department."

More Amazon QuickSight pricing and cost advice

"The price of Looker usually depends on the solution's provider, but it is usually cheaper than the other products in the market. Looker is offered at different prices for different companies."

"I do not have to make any payments to use the solution."

"It is cheap."

"It's not cheap, but it's not expensive for big companies."

"Looker is expensive and could be made better by reducing it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

30%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon QuickSight?

The integration is very seamless. We stored our result CSV files in S3 and connected directly from there.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon QuickSight?

Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments. However, this cost is offset by the advantages it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon QuickSight?

See all answers

What do you like most about Looker?

With Looker, I have experienced benefits in terms of usability and shareability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Looker?

I do not have to make any payments to use the solution. In the beginning, Looker may work fine for its users. If advanced users who have experience with BI tools use Looker, then they may find it t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Looker?

The visualization capability of the product is limited. From an improvement perspective, the product should have more visualization capability. I can't clean data in Looker, and if I try to do it, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 27% of the time

Tableau vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 18% of the time

Looker Studio vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 13% of the time

Qlik Sense vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Cognos vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon QuickSight Competitors

Databricks vs Looker

Compared 17% of the time

Tableau vs Looker

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Looker

Compared 9% of the time

SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform vs Looker

Compared 8% of the time

Domo vs Looker

Compared 6% of the time

More Looker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight

April 2025

Download Amazon QuickSight product report

Buyer's Guide

Looker

April 2025

Download Looker product report

Also Known As

QuickSight

No data available

Overview

Amazon QuickSight is a fast, cloud-powered business analytics service that makes it easy to build visualizations, perform ad-hoc analysis, and quickly get business insights from your data. Using our cloud-based service you can easily connect to your data, perform advanced analysis, and create stunning visualizations and rich dashboards that can be accessed from any browser or mobile device.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Looker is a powerful data analytics platform that empowers businesses to explore and analyze their data in real time.

With its intuitive interface and robust features, Looker enables users to easily create and share interactive dashboards, reports, and visualizations.

The product's advanced data modeling capabilities and seamless integration with popular data sources make it a top choice for organizations looking to gain valuable insights from their data.

Google

Sample Customers

MLB Advanced Media, Infor, HotelBeds, Gemini, Jivochat, Edmunds.com

Yahoo!, Etsy, Kohler, Hipcamp, Hubspot, Kickstarter, Venmo, Dollar Shave Club, 600+ customer

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.