Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Redshift vs Firebolt comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Redshift
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Firebolt
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
14th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Amazon Redshift is 7.7%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Firebolt is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Warehouse
 

Featured Reviews

Ved Prakash Yadav - PeerSpot reviewer
Works as a data warehouse system and collects data from different sources
In terms of improvement, I believe Amazon Redshift could work on reducing its costs, as they tend to increase significantly. Additionally, there are occasional issues with nodes going down, which can be problematic. We often encounter issues like someone dropping a column or changing the order of columns, which can cause synchronization problems when pushing data through our pipeline. It's a minor issue, but it can be annoying.
Iqbal Hossain Raju - PeerSpot reviewer
Can quickly query it to generate quick results
We have used Snowflake before. We support both. Firebolt has better performance, executing queries much quicker than Snowflake. However, Snowflake has more functionality. Depending on the client's needs, we can recommend the best option. Firebolt is a relatively new technology. Snowflake has many functionalities. Firebolt does not support unloading data to S3. There is no built-in way to do this in Firebolt. Alternatively, the data can be retrieved using API calls and loaded to S3 manually. Data can be unloaded to S3 directly using Snowflake. Firebolt significantly improves our performance over Snowflake because it takes less time to execute queries. This is especially important for our company because we use some KPIs that require fast loading times.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It allows for the storage of huge amounts of data."
"The product offers good support for the data lake."
"The feature that we find most useful is the ability to do analytics on the fly."
"Redshift allows you to transform different data formats and consolidate them into one Redshift cluster. This means you can transform various siloed data sources like Excel files and CSV files into Redshift."
"Redshift has an advantage when it comes to administration, making it easier to manage and collaborate."
"With the APIs that are available, it can be easily integrated with other tools."
"Setup is easy. It's a fast solution with machine learning features, good integration, and a good API."
"You can copy JSON to the column and have it analyzed using simple functions."
"Firebolt is fast for analytical purposes. For example, we have analytical data in our data warehouse, and Firebolt can quickly query it to generate quick results."
 

Cons

"If you require a highly scalable solution, I would not recommend Amazon Redshift."
"Redshift's GUI could be more user-friendly. It's easier to perform queries and all that stuff in Azure Synapse Analytics."
"In our experiments, the handling of unstructured data was not very smooth."
"The initial setup is a complex process, especially for someone who is not familiar with nodes and configuring terms like RPUs."
"We recently moved from the DC2 cluster to the RA3 cluster, which is a different node type and we are finding some issues with the RA3 cluster regarding connection and processing. There is room for improvement in this area. We are in talks with AWS regarding the connection issues."
"Amazon Redshift does not have the capability to dynamically increase the VM file."
"Improvement could be made in the area of streaming data."
"It lacks a few features which can be very useful, such as stored procedures"
"Firebolt's engine takes a long time to start because it needs to make engine calls."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you want a fixed price, an to not worry about every query, but you need to manage your nodes personally, use Redshift."
"The cost will depend on how you set up your warehouse and what kind of data you store."
"The cost must be improved."
"The cost is comparable to Snowflake."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"For Amazon Redshift, we pay around INR 60,000 annually. The cost factor also depends on the number of existing customers."
"It's around $200 US dollars. There are some data transfer costs but it's minimal, around $20."
"At the moment, pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it depends on the size of the company."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
62%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Healthcare Company
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Amazon Redshift compare with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics?
Amazon Redshift is very fast, has a very good response time, and is very user-friendly. The initial setup is very straightforward. This solution can merge and integrate well with many different dat...
What do you like most about Amazon Redshift?
The tool's most valuable feature is its parallel processing capability. It can handle massive amounts of data, even when pushing hundreds of terabytes, and its scaling capabilities are good.
What do you like most about Firebolt?
Firebolt is fast for analytical purposes. For example, we have analytical data in our data warehouse, and Firebolt can quickly query it to generate quick results.
What needs improvement with Firebolt?
Firebolt's engine takes a long time to start because it needs to make engine calls. Currently, the data size of Firebolt is small. It can be increased.
What advice do you have for others considering Firebolt?
One way to retrieve data from firewalls is to add query parameters to the connection string. For example, you can use the REST API to retrieve the security query. Some firewalls have been deployed ...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Liberty Mutual Insurance, 4Cite Marketing, BrandVerity, DNA Plc, Sirocco Systems, Gainsight, Blue 449
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Cloud Data Warehouse. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.