Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Redshift vs Netezza Analytics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Redshift
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
66
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Warehouse (4th)
Netezza Analytics
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Hadoop (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Amazon Redshift and Netezza Analytics aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Amazon Redshift is designed for Cloud Data Warehouse and holds a mindshare of 7.7%, down 11.9% compared to last year.
Netezza Analytics, on the other hand, focuses on Hadoop, holds 1.4% mindshare, up 1.0% since last year.
Cloud Data Warehouse
Hadoop
 

Featured Reviews

Ved Prakash Yadav - PeerSpot reviewer
Works as a data warehouse system and collects data from different sources
In terms of improvement, I believe Amazon Redshift could work on reducing its costs, as they tend to increase significantly. Additionally, there are occasional issues with nodes going down, which can be problematic. We often encounter issues like someone dropping a column or changing the order of columns, which can cause synchronization problems when pushing data through our pipeline. It's a minor issue, but it can be annoying.
Asish Govind - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable with limited administration needed but it's coming up on its end of life
I'm not sure if Netezza offers a cloud version of the solution or not, but if they don't they should. Most companies are focused on moving towards the cloud. If it was on a cloud it would offer certain scalability and performance aspects it can't offer as a physical appliance. I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is relatively easy to use because there is no indexing and no partitions."
"Redshift has an advantage when it comes to administration, making it easier to manage and collaborate."
"It is very easy to dump data into the tool."
"The solution's flexibility is its most valuable feature. It's also easy to scale and has relatively painless pricing."
"The solution is easy to set up and use."
"It's very easy to migrate from other databases to Redshift. There are migration tools dedicated for this purpose, enabling migration from other databases like MS SQL directly to Redshift. The majority of the scripts will be automatically transposed."
"I am satisfied with the performance of the product."
"For the on-premises version of Amazon Redshift, we need to start from scratch. However, with the cloud version whenever you want to deploy, you can scale up, and down, and it has a data warehousing capability. Redshift has many features."
"The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution."
"Speed contributes to large capacity."
"It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution."
"Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more."
"For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable."
 

Cons

"There is some missing functionality and sometimes it's so difficult to work in. We need to convert these functionalities using VACUUM inside Amazon Redshift and then it causes some complexity."
"They should provide a better way to work with interim data in a structured way than to store it in parquet files locally."
"Pricing is one of the things that it could improve. It should be more competitive."
"The product must become a bit more serverless."
"Running parallel queries results in poor performance and this needs to be improved."
"Compatibility with other products, for example, Microsoft and Google, is a bit difficult because each one of them wants to be isolated with their solutions."
"It takes a lot of time to ingest and update the data."
"The customer support could be more responsive."
"I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life."
"In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there."
"The Analytics feature should be simplified."
"Disaster recovery support. Because it was an appliance, and if you wanted to support disaster recovery, you needed to buy two."
"The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support."
"Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing."
"The solution could implement more reporting tools and networking utilities."
"The hardware has a risk of failure. They need to improve this."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost must be improved."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing a seven."
"For Amazon Redshift, we pay around INR 60,000 annually. The cost factor also depends on the number of existing customers."
"If you want a fixed price, an to not worry about every query, but you need to manage your nodes personally, use Redshift."
"The solution has very competitive pricing."
"Per hour pricing is helpful to keep the costs of a pilot down, but long-term retention is expensive."
"At the moment, pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it depends on the size of the company."
"One of my customers went with Google Big Query over Redshift because it was significantly cheaper for their project."
"Expensive to maintain compared to other solutions."
"The annual licensing fees are twenty-two percent of the product cost."
"For me, mainly, it reduces my costs. It's not only the appliance cost. There are also support costs and a maintenance costs. It does reduce the costs very drastically."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
60%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
4%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Amazon Redshift compare with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics?
Amazon Redshift is very fast, has a very good response time, and is very user-friendly. The initial setup is very straightforward. This solution can merge and integrate well with many different dat...
What do you like most about Amazon Redshift?
The tool's most valuable feature is its parallel processing capability. It can handle massive amounts of data, even when pushing hundreds of terabytes, and its scaling capabilities are good.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Redshift?
You can start small with a basic cluster to learn and practice with it. Selecting the most basic and economical cluster type can save you enough money to move forward with the solution or go with a...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Liberty Mutual Insurance, 4Cite Marketing, BrandVerity, DNA Plc, Sirocco Systems, Gainsight, Blue 449
A leading online advertising network
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Cloud Data Warehouse. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.