Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Redshift vs Netezza Analytics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Redshift
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Warehouse (4th)
Netezza Analytics
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Hadoop (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Amazon Redshift and Netezza Analytics aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Amazon Redshift is designed for Cloud Data Warehouse and holds a mindshare of 7.7%, down 11.5% compared to last year.
Netezza Analytics, on the other hand, focuses on Hadoop, holds 1.5% mindshare, up 1.2% since last year.
Cloud Data Warehouse
Hadoop
 

Featured Reviews

Ved Prakash Yadav - PeerSpot reviewer
Works as a data warehouse system and collects data from different sources
In terms of improvement, I believe Amazon Redshift could work on reducing its costs, as they tend to increase significantly. Additionally, there are occasional issues with nodes going down, which can be problematic. We often encounter issues like someone dropping a column or changing the order of columns, which can cause synchronization problems when pushing data through our pipeline. It's a minor issue, but it can be annoying.
Asish Govind - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable with limited administration needed but it's coming up on its end of life
I'm not sure if Netezza offers a cloud version of the solution or not, but if they don't they should. Most companies are focused on moving towards the cloud. If it was on a cloud it would offer certain scalability and performance aspects it can't offer as a physical appliance. I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that the solution is fully embedded in the AWS stack."
"The solution is scalable. It handles different loads very well."
"It allows you write complex queries and perform row by row processes."
"I find the most valuable features to be the MPP style of processing, which mostly all of the data warehouses provide. The ability to integrate all other AWS services, such as NSS and S3, with little effort is very helpful. The service is well maintained, there are update patches frequently."
"The main benefit is that our portal for end users is running in AWS, so we can easily connect it to other AWS services."
"The most valuable features of Amazon Redshift are that its fast and efficient. We have lots of TBs of data and it's very fast."
"The feature that we find most useful is the ability to do analytics on the fly."
"The solution's speed, stability, and user concurrency have been very good."
"The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution."
"Speed contributes to large capacity."
"It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data."
"Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable."
"The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution."
 

Cons

"The refreshment rate of data reaching Redshift from other sources should be faster."
"It lacks a few features which can be very useful, such as stored procedures"
"It would be good to see Redshift as a serverless offering."
"Migrating data from other data sources can be challenging when you are working with multibyte character sets."
"Sometimes, it's difficult to get the metadata from Redshift."
"The solution has four maintenance windows so, when it comes to stability, I think it would be better to decrease their number."
"It takes a lot of time to ingest and update the data."
"One area where Amazon Redshift could improve is in adopting the compute-separate, data-separate architecture, which Delta, Snowflake are adopting, and a few others in the cloud data warehouse spectrum."
"This product is being discontinued from IBM, and I would like to have some kind of upgrade available."
"The solution could implement more reporting tools and networking utilities."
"The hardware has a risk of failure. They need to improve this."
"The Analytics feature should be simplified."
"The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support."
"Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing."
"In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there."
"Disaster recovery support. Because it was an appliance, and if you wanted to support disaster recovery, you needed to buy two."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable. According to the RA3 cluster particularly, it provides 128 GB of storage with only four nodes. If you can manage your computations processes with the help of materialized views and proper queries. I think the IP clusters are very useful and overall fair for the price."
"The price of Amazon Redshift is reasonable because it depends on the usage that you use and for DWH for the long term."
"It's not very pricey compared to other tools. I would rate the price as 5 out of 10."
"Pricing for Amazon Redshift is reasonable, though it could be somewhat higher than other solutions, such as Azure. Still, when you base your comparison on the services offered and the pricing, it's the most reasonable versus its competitors, such as RDS."
"The solution is available at a mid-range price compared to other vendors."
"The product is quite expensive."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing a seven."
"The cost must be improved."
"Expensive to maintain compared to other solutions."
"For me, mainly, it reduces my costs. It's not only the appliance cost. There are also support costs and a maintenance costs. It does reduce the costs very drastically."
"The annual licensing fees are twenty-two percent of the product cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
62%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
4%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Amazon Redshift compare with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics?
Amazon Redshift is very fast, has a very good response time, and is very user-friendly. The initial setup is very straightforward. This solution can merge and integrate well with many different dat...
What do you like most about Amazon Redshift?
The tool's most valuable feature is its parallel processing capability. It can handle massive amounts of data, even when pushing hundreds of terabytes, and its scaling capabilities are good.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Liberty Mutual Insurance, 4Cite Marketing, BrandVerity, DNA Plc, Sirocco Systems, Gainsight, Blue 449
A leading online advertising network
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Cloud Data Warehouse. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.