Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Redshift vs Netezza Analytics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Redshift
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Warehouse (5th)
Netezza Analytics
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Hadoop (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Amazon Redshift and Netezza Analytics aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Amazon Redshift is designed for Cloud Data Warehouse and holds a mindshare of 7.2%, down 9.2% compared to last year.
Netezza Analytics, on the other hand, focuses on Hadoop, holds 1.4% mindshare, up 1.1% since last year.
Cloud Data Warehouse
Hadoop
 

Featured Reviews

Ved Prakash Yadav - PeerSpot reviewer
Works as a data warehouse system and collects data from different sources
In terms of improvement, I believe Amazon Redshift could work on reducing its costs, as they tend to increase significantly. Additionally, there are occasional issues with nodes going down, which can be problematic. We often encounter issues like someone dropping a column or changing the order of columns, which can cause synchronization problems when pushing data through our pipeline. It's a minor issue, but it can be annoying.
Shiv Subramaniam Koduvayur - PeerSpot reviewer
A robust solution with good support, but a better GUI for database management is needed
The biggest lesson that I have learned from using this solution is that a lot of evaluation should be done before starting. Also, we needed to put a lot of effort into understanding the different functions that the product offers. This allows you to best leverage the capability of the product. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's flexibility is its most valuable feature. It's also easy to scale and has relatively painless pricing."
"Amazon Redshift is a really powerful database system for reporting and data warehousing."
"Redshift's versioning and data security are the two most critical features. When migrating into the cloud, it's vital to secure the data. The encryption and security are there."
"If the analyst knows SQL, which is comfortable and easy to use to go between all of these tool stacks, I think it's reliable. It's a secure and reliable data warehouse."
"It is very easy to dump data into the tool."
"The seamless connection and good scalability on the cloud are valuable features of Amazon Redshift."
"We have found Machine Learning use cases are very nice."
"It allows for the storage of huge amounts of data."
"It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data."
"The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution."
"Speed contributes to large capacity."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution."
"For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable."
"Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more."
 

Cons

"When working with third-party services requires additional integrations and configurations, which can sometimes add more cost."
"The refreshment rate of data reaching Redshift from other sources should be faster."
"Improvement could be made in the area of streaming data."
"The solution is unable to work fast."
"Planting is the primary key enforcement that should be improved."
"One area where Amazon Redshift could improve is in adopting the compute-separate, data-separate architecture, which Delta, Snowflake are adopting, and a few others in the cloud data warehouse spectrum."
"Running parallel queries results in poor performance and this needs to be improved."
"The solution could improve in handling more data formats and more native support for RDF."
"Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing."
"Disaster recovery support. Because it was an appliance, and if you wanted to support disaster recovery, you needed to buy two."
"The Analytics feature should be simplified."
"The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support."
"I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life."
"In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there."
"This product is being discontinued from IBM, and I would like to have some kind of upgrade available."
"The solution could implement more reporting tools and networking utilities."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution has very competitive pricing."
"I have heard complaints about the solution’s pricing, and thus I rate it as a five."
"It is an expensive product."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing a seven."
"One of my customers went with Google Big Query over Redshift because it was significantly cheaper for their project."
"The solution is available at a mid-range price compared to other vendors."
"For Amazon Redshift, we pay around INR 60,000 annually. The cost factor also depends on the number of existing customers."
"The price of Amazon Redshift is reasonable because it depends on the usage that you use and for DWH for the long term."
"For me, mainly, it reduces my costs. It's not only the appliance cost. There are also support costs and a maintenance costs. It does reduce the costs very drastically."
"The annual licensing fees are twenty-two percent of the product cost."
"Expensive to maintain compared to other solutions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
64%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
3%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Amazon Redshift compare with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics?
Amazon Redshift is very fast, has a very good response time, and is very user-friendly. The initial setup is very straightforward. This solution can merge and integrate well with many different dat...
What do you like most about Amazon Redshift?
The tool's most valuable feature is its parallel processing capability. It can handle massive amounts of data, even when pushing hundreds of terabytes, and its scaling capabilities are good.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Liberty Mutual Insurance, 4Cite Marketing, BrandVerity, DNA Plc, Sirocco Systems, Gainsight, Blue 449
A leading online advertising network
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Microsoft, Google and others in Cloud Data Warehouse. Updated: April 2025.
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.