Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Redshift vs Oracle Big Data Appliance comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Redshift
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Warehouse (5th)
Oracle Big Data Appliance
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (19th)
 

Featured Reviews

Ved Prakash Yadav - PeerSpot reviewer
Works as a data warehouse system and collects data from different sources
In terms of improvement, I believe Amazon Redshift could work on reducing its costs, as they tend to increase significantly. Additionally, there are occasional issues with nodes going down, which can be problematic. We often encounter issues like someone dropping a column or changing the order of columns, which can cause synchronization problems when pushing data through our pipeline. It's a minor issue, but it can be annoying.
Mohammed Hamad - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides clean, centralized data
From a technical perspective, Big Data Appliance could be improved with more innovation in the AI and machine-learning parts instead of relying on Cloudera. Oracle could also improve Big Data Appliance by having one technology on their stack and working on it instead of continually changing the name or technologies or features. In addition, they could have a program to enable their partners to use this technology because right now, I have to have an expert to use the AI elements.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"You can copy JSON to the column and have it analyzed using simple functions."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability, as it grows according to our needs."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Redshift has an advantage when it comes to administration, making it easier to manage and collaborate."
"The solution's speed, stability, and user concurrency have been very good."
"Setup is easy. It's a fast solution with machine learning features, good integration, and a good API."
"The most valuable features of Amazon Redshift are that its fast and efficient. We have lots of TBs of data and it's very fast."
"I have primarily used the Redshift Spectrum feature and found it most valuable."
"Because Big Data Appliance allows me to have a single source of truth, it means I have clean data that can be monetized and leveraged to gain more insights with real-time reports from the dashboard."
"This is a comprehensive solution that is easy to deploy."
"The best thing about the product is that the end-user can build the reports by themselves without really knowing anything about databases."
 

Cons

"Amazon Redshift does not have the capability to dynamically increase the VM file."
"The initial setup is a complex process, especially for someone who is not familiar with nodes and configuring terms like RPUs."
"Migrating data from other data sources can be challenging when you are working with multibyte character sets."
"They should provide a better way to work with interim data in a structured way than to store it in parquet files locally."
"This solution lacks integration with non-AWS sources."
"Running parallel queries results in poor performance and this needs to be improved."
"The product could be improved by making it more flexible."
"There are too many limitations with respect to concurrency."
"The product should be simplified for the average user."
"From a technical perspective, Big Data Appliance could be improved with more innovation in the AI and machine-learning parts instead of relying on Cloudera."
"It seems like the deployment of repositories has become more difficult in later versions of the product rather than easier."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The part that I like best is that you only pay for what you are using."
"The price of Amazon Redshift is reasonable because it depends on the usage that you use and for DWH for the long term."
"At the moment, pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it depends on the size of the company."
"In comparison to the price of similar solutions, Redshift's cost is the lowest."
"The product is quite expensive."
"The cost will depend on how you set up your warehouse and what kind of data you store."
"Per hour pricing is helpful to keep the costs of a pilot down, but long-term retention is expensive."
"I have heard complaints about the solution’s pricing, and thus I rate it as a five."
"Oracle's prices are too high compared to others in the market."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
64%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
10%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Amazon Redshift compare with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics?
Amazon Redshift is very fast, has a very good response time, and is very user-friendly. The initial setup is very straightforward. This solution can merge and integrate well with many different dat...
What do you like most about Amazon Redshift?
The tool's most valuable feature is its parallel processing capability. It can handle massive amounts of data, even when pushing hundreds of terabytes, and its scaling capabilities are good.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Liberty Mutual Insurance, 4Cite Marketing, BrandVerity, DNA Plc, Sirocco Systems, Gainsight, Blue 449
Caixa Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Redshift vs. Oracle Big Data Appliance and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.