Apache HBase vs IBM Netezza Performance Server comparison

Apache and IBM are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Additionally, 50% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Apache HBase

Read 2 Apache HBase reviews

870 Views
752 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

IBM Netezza Performance Server

Read 34 IBM Netezza Performance Server reviews

1,489 Views
762 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Apache HBase

IBM Netezza Performance Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache HBase and IBM Netezza Performance Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache HBase vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apache HBase vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache HBase

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

NoSQL Databases (11th)

IBM Netezza Performance Server

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (11th)

Featured Reviews

Sekhar Reddy B

Principal Software Engineer at Securonix

Offers real-time aggregations and easy for a beginner to learn to use this

We use it for real-time data grouping The most valuable part is the column family structure. We mainly use it for real-time aggregations. That's why we prefer it as a NoSQL database. We've seen performance issues when we have more regions. The product needs improvement in that area. So we…

Read full review

Shiv Subramaniam Koduvayur

Project Manager at MAF Retail

Parallel data processing streamlines operations while cost and cloud integration challenge adoption

The cost of the solution is on the more expensive side, which is a concern for me. Additionally, its promotion and interaction with cloud applications are limited. The cloud version is only available in AWS, and in the Middle East, it is not well-developed in the Azure environment. For the cost to be reduced, it should match competitors. Many features need to be incorporated on the cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable part is the column family structure."

"Apache HBase is a database used for data storage."

"IBM Netezza Performance Server is a cost-effective solution."

"Parallel data processing is a significant feature for me."

"The data governance prospect... from what I've seen, that is a really powerful tool as well, to help with data lineage and keeping track of that."

"We are able to execute very complex queries. Over 90 percent of our query executions are one second or less. We do millions of queries everyday."

"The underlying hardware that IBM provides with this appliance is made for a specific purpose, to serve performance on a large amount of data, and to do analytics as well. It is faster, when you compare it to any other product."

"The most valuable feature would be the fact that it has been running for awhile in an appliance format."

"The benefit is really because of the additional speed that we have and, truth be told, the more updated ETL processes and the revamped scheduler in general."

"The performance is most important to me, and it helps our ability to make business decisions quickly."

More IBM Netezza Performance Server pros

Cons

"I don't like using Apache HBase to store huge amounts of data because of many performance issues."

"We've seen performance issues."

"IBM Netezza Performance Server could improve its interface, support for big data, and APA-based connectivity should be available."

"LIke Teradata, we can’t add a node/SPU to the existing appliance."

"The scalability is not as expected. The capacity in the black box is not enough."

"The product cost is high compared to others in the market, and this cost has become unbearable for me."

"The only issue is that it's not expandable."

"In terms of features that I would like to see, one is the ability to actually scale out an architecture. Right now, if you buy one, it's fixed. There is no scale-up availability at all."

"Our main problem with it is concurrency. When there are too many users running Netezza at the same time, this is when we have the most complaints."

"We are not able to scale. The only way to scale is to get another appliance, but we have a customers who would need us to hydrate the data between the two appliances, and Netezza does not do that."

More IBM Netezza Performance Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is very expensive. It has a lot CPUs with a lot of components in it. It also has built-in redundancy for resiliency reasons."

"Netezza is a costly solution. It does serve a specific purpose but it's costlier than what's available in the market, if you go to the cloud."

"The solution has a yearly licensing fee, and users have to pay extra for support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Educational Organization

74%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache HBase?

Apache HBase is a database used for data storage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache HBase?

We've seen performance issues when we have more regions. The product needs improvement in that area. So we experience performance issues sometimes when the load increases.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Apache HBase?

It's better to use AWS DynamoDB or Cassandra. I would rate it an eight out of ten. It is easy for a beginner to learn.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Netezza Performance Server?

IBM Netezza Performance Server is a cost-effective solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Netezza Performance Server?

The solution has a yearly licensing fee, and users have to pay extra for support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Netezza Performance Server?

See all answers

Comparisons

Accumulo vs Apache HBase

Compared 27% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Apache HBase

Compared 22% of the time

Aerospike Database 7 vs Apache HBase

Compared 12% of the time

Cassandra vs Apache HBase

Compared 9% of the time

Redis vs Apache HBase

Compared 9% of the time

More Apache HBase Competitors

Teradata vs IBM Netezza Performance Server

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs IBM Netezza Performance Server

Compared 17% of the time

Snowflake vs IBM Netezza Performance Server

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Database vs IBM Netezza Performance Server

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs IBM Netezza Performance Server

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Netezza Performance Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

March 2025

Download Apache HBase product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Netezza Performance Server

March 2025

Download IBM Netezza Performance Server product report

Also Known As

HBase

Netezza Performance Server, Netezza

Overview

Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, non-relational database modeled after Google's BigTable. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, Apache HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Hadoop and HDFS.

Apache

IBM Netezza appliances are now part of IBM PureSystems - expert integrated systems with built in expertise, integration by design and a simplified user experience. Part of the PureData family, the Netezza appliance is now known as the PureData System for Analytics. It has the same key design tenets of simplicity, speed, scalability and analytics power that was fundamental to Netezza appliances.

IBM

Sample Customers

Bloomberg, Wells Fargo, Apple, Capital One, NVIDIA

Seattle Childrens Hospital, Carphone Warehouse, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Battelle, Start Today Co. Ltd., Kelley Blue Book, Trident Marketing, Elisa Corporation, Catalina Marketing, iBasis, Barnes & Noble, Qualcomm, MediaMath, Acxiom, iBasis, Foxwoods

Buyer's Guide

Apache HBase vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server

February 2025

Free Report: Apache HBase vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache HBase vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache HBase vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.