IBM Db2 Database vs IBM Netezza Performance Server comparison

"It's the best solution in terms of security, performance, and availability because the system is available 24/7."

"The solution is a very stable relational database and has integration with legacy systems. It is a great product."

"IBM DB2 pureScale Feature is valuable."

"It is quite a stable solution."

"The initial setup was easy."

"IBM Db2 was much cheaper as a package than using other products. This is because IBM supplied a package with its product. It's an application. So it was much more efficient and a stronger competitor in that regard."

"The solution has many beneficial features, such as security, support, and stability."

"The structure is straightforward, consisting of the test file and the logical and physical files. You have one physical file and many logical files related to it."

"Distribution concurrency control."

"The most valuable features of the IBM Netezza Performance Server are the NPS server because of the reduced maintenance and overall good performance."

"We are able to execute very complex queries. Over 90 percent of our query executions are one second or less. We do millions of queries everyday."

"The benefit is really because of the additional speed that we have and, truth be told, the more updated ETL processes and the revamped scheduler in general."

"The most valuable feature would be the fact that it has been running for awhile in an appliance format."

"IBM Netezza Performance Server is a cost-effective solution."

"The data governance prospect... from what I've seen, that is a really powerful tool as well, to help with data lineage and keeping track of that."

"Parallel data processing is a significant feature for me."

"Its process of building up queries could be more accessible."

"They should develop its containerized version."

"Microsoft SQL Server is comparatively very simple to use. I wish IBM would move towards making Db2 easy to use for both basic and advanced users. This is where I see room for advancement. Db2 is also more expensive than Microsoft SQL Server, and its price can be reduced. The replication feature needs to be there in Db2. Microsoft provides similar functionality in SQL Server. IBM also has similar functionality, but it exists in a different product. So, to have the replication ability, you have to buy a different product. It makes sense to have this functionality within Db2 instead of a different product. It will also be helpful in terms of competition. In Africa, the problem for Db2 is competition. Oracle Database and Microsoft SQL Server have been in this market for a very long time. These companies have built the ecosystem and the brand within this market for a very long time. So, they are very popular with users. Db2 or IBM came a little later in the game, and that's where the problem lies. They also don't do a lot of marketing for it, which is also a problem."

"IBM's support isn't as strong as it used to be, especially when it comes to providing fixes."

"IBM Db2 Database could improve in the steps it takes for upgrades. It is not an easy process. The process of upgrading the version is lengthy and requires a lot of time. To make it more efficient, I suggest implementing some automation on the solution side. This will greatly reduce the time required for the upgrade."

"There could be more user-friendly tools with features such as drag-and-drop functionality, visual basics, and low-code capabilities."

"Some of the internal rearrangement in the administration is not as straightforward as it is in competing products."

"The solution could be more modern and have updated database technology."

"Oracle Exadata's security features, like TDE encryption, are missing in IBM Netezza Performance Server."

"The only issue is that it's not expandable."

"Our main problem with it is concurrency. When there are too many users running Netezza at the same time, this is when we have the most complaints."

"Concurrency limit needs to be increased somewhat."

"The scalability is not as expected. The capacity in the black box is not enough."

"The product cost is high compared to others in the market, and this cost has become unbearable for me."

"We are not able to scale. The only way to scale is to get another appliance, but we have a customers who would need us to hydrate the data between the two appliances, and Netezza does not do that."

"IBM Netezza Performance Server could improve its interface, support for big data, and APA-based connectivity should be available."

"There is a license for this solution and we pay every three years."

"The solution's hardware and subscription model for support are very expensive."

"It is expensive when compared to other products."

"Clients are required to purchase a license."

"If I consider the price of IBM Db2 Database, I would say there are cheaper products in the market."

"I think that everyone knows that with IBM the standard price is higher than the others."

"We did not buy it. It came with our hardware without any complimentary maintenance. If I compare Db2 Database with Oracle Database, its price is lower than Oracle Database."

"Compared to other databases, Db2 is relatively cheaper."

"The pricing is very expensive. It has a lot CPUs with a lot of components in it. It also has built-in redundancy for resiliency reasons."

"The solution has a yearly licensing fee, and users have to pay extra for support."

"Netezza is a costly solution. It does serve a specific purpose but it's costlier than what's available in the market, if you go to the cloud."