We performed a comparison between Apache JMeter and Apigee based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the fact that JMeter integrates well with other tools."
"The solution helps by detecting bottlenecks."
"We appreciate that the solution is free to use, as an open-source tool."
"Apache JMeter is stable."
"When there's a high number of TPS I can achieve more transactions per seconds given the hyper-limitations."
"It is easy to set up."
"JMeter is a free tool with a large user population, which comes in handy because we have a vast knowledge base to tap into when needed. It's also easier to hire consultants who know JMeter."
"Scripting with the solution is good."
"Apigee has proven to be one of the best of the breed."
"The security provided by the solution is excellent."
"It's a good return on my investment."
"It's stable."
"I have not encountered instability with the product."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Lifecycle management."
"It accelerates development and deployment processes."
"The solution needs more metrics for reporting."
"The UI of the solution needs to be better. The UI takes up a lot of our bandwidth."
"We would like more documentation to be provided for the advanced level features that are available in this solution, in order to improve development."
"The memory utilization in JMeter is very poor."
"The initial setup is complex and needs to be upgraded."
"If the solution was GUI based, I believe that it would be more versatile."
"Currently, the integration pipeline is implemented by using Jenkins or a similar tool platform. These are continuous integration tools. As far as I know, integration is done by using custom scripts. It would be good if the integration with a continuous integration pipeline, like Jenkins or Hudson, can be done out of the box without using a script."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"One feature they have to invest time into is the developer portal they use."
"Sometimes there are glitches, which means there's still room for improvement in the platform."
"The solution tends to hide the limitations to keep selling the product."
"They need to work on the cost of the solution."
"The entire user across all the layers should be singly authenticated through an external authentication system."
"Proxy versioning seems a bit confusing/buried in the publishing experience, especially for the URI-based versioning approach."
"Better functionality for validating inputs and outputs would be helpful."
"It is an expensive solution."
Apache JMeter is ranked 3rd in API Testing Tools with 82 reviews while Apigee is ranked 6th in API Testing Tools with 82 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.8, while Apigee is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "It's a free tool with a vast knowledge base, but the reporting is lackluster, and it has a steep learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". Apache JMeter is most compared with BlazeMeter, Postman, Tricentis NeoLoad, Katalon Studio and OpenText LoadRunner Professional, whereas Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, Amazon API Gateway, WSO2 API Manager and Layer7 API Management. See our Apache JMeter vs. Apigee report.
See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.