Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

Google and WSO2 are both solutions in the API Management category. Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while WSO2 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.7. Google holds a 14.2% mindshare in APIM, compared to WSO2’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Apigee

Read 86 Apigee reviews

20,170 Views
15,653 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

WSO2 API Manager

Read 40 WSO2 API Manager reviews

6,382 Views
4,570 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Apigee

WSO2 API Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Apigee and WSO2 API Manager are both in the API management platform category. Apigee has the upper hand in enterprise needs due to its strong analytics and developer support, though it comes at a higher cost. WSO2 API Manager is favored for its open-source model, offering flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Apigee includes comprehensive analytics, various monetization options, and a Drupal-based developer portal for better user engagement. It supports deployment as SaaS and on-premise, with enhanced integration capabilities. WSO2 API Manager is renowned for open-source accessibility, lifecycle management of APIs, and flexibility in integration with different systems.

Room for Improvement: Apigee could simplify its infrastructure requirements and improve cost structures while broadening its range of integration connectors. Enhancements in the user interface and more comprehensive documentation could benefit users. WSO2 API Manager needs improvements in role-based access management, simplification of installation processes, and modernization of its user interface and support systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apigee's diverse deployment options, particularly cloud-based, facilitate seamless integration and scalability, although inconsistency in technical support needs addressing. WSO2 API Manager offers flexible open-source and simpler on-premise solutions but lacks Apigee's robust cloud-native features, and while generally well-rated, it lacks advanced strategic support.

Pricing and ROI: Apigee is known for its higher cost, tied to API call volumes and deployment needs, presenting a significant investment for large enterprises. The extensive feature set often justifies this cost with a good ROI, particularly in terms of security and scalability. In contrast, WSO2 API Manager's open-source model limits financial barriers, making it particularly cost-effective for smaller enterprises, with accessible pricing that encourages broader adoption without the need for significant investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Apigee vs. WSO2 API Manager Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. WSO2 API Manager

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apigee

Ranking in API Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (8th)

WSO2 API Manager

Ranking in API Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apigee is 14.2%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 4.8%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

ShawkyFoda

Senior Consultant at Goverment

Provides high visibility and control with good traffic monitoring

Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability. The replication process between Master and Slave for disaster recovery takes too long. Dependencies on analytics impact the performance of the user interface, which should be separate. The complex setup process on-premises, especially with multi-node installations, could also be improved. Additional control in product declarations, based on operations like POST and GET, is needed.

Read full review

VishalSingh14

IT Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Easy to deploy APIs and easy to manage CORS configuration

I have used WSO2 Store and WSO2 API Manager at the architecture level. I worked on two versions, namely WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 and 5.7.0. I have also worked with WSO2 Identity Server versions 5.7 and 5.11. There are certain things that Apigee handles better than WSO2 API Manager. The user interface of WSO2 API Manager is much easier than that of Apigee. The scope of flexibility was much greater in Apigee. In WSO2 API Manager, we had little flexibility and were restricted to a specific software or tool. On the other hand, we had the scope of customization in Apigee.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apigee is relatively easy to use for developers."

"Technical support has been decent."

"This is a front-layer gateway that helps to improve our overall performance."

"The initial setup isn't too complex."

"Apigee is very easy to use, and you can code in any language."

"The drag-and-drop and click-through functionalities, alongside minimal code requirements, make Apigee valuable. It is intuitive and user-friendly."

"It nice and easy for the clients and those using the product to access the product's help resources."

"I'm still evaluating, but in terms of overall performance and stability, it's quite good."

More Apigee pros

"We could easily deploy APIs on WSO2 API Manager, and CORS configuration was easy to manage."

"There are a lot of tools to help the manager. WSO2 is very easy to install. It has all the principal functionalities that you think about when you want to put up the management solution. It's a very friendly tool."

"It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability."

"This is a flexible and versatile API management solution that has the power to integrate with more than just API."

"The solution is stable."

"It's a good product."

"Based on the information I have, the solution's most valuable feature is its capability of implementing custom solutions."

"Yes WSO2 API Manager is scalable"

More WSO2 API Manager pros

Cons

"Apigee is not a solution compatible with public clouds, making it one of its shortcomings where improvements are required."

"Drag and drop of features would be more beneficial, rather than manually working on the configuration and updates."

"There should be an integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment approach with Apigee. Currently, for development at a more integrated level, you have set it up yourself."

"I would like to see the monitoring, dashboards, and reports improve."

"The solution is pretty expensive."

"Unlike WSA, Apigee does not have a partnership model, something which makes it a bit easier for companies such as ours to go with the former solution."

"The integration could be improved within the solution. There is a need to pay more attention to this."

"There is potential for improvement in specific domain integrations, such as standard integration capabilities needed for banking or retail sectors."

More Apigee cons

"I would like it to be a more convenient development platform with the ability to write orchestrations and so on. Our problem with this product is that in my country, we are the only enterprise that has been using this product. We're missing a lot of knowledge from colleagues to consult with, and we also aren't able to recruit people with relevant skills. It is a big problem. The small team that is maintaining this product is the only team that can actually relate to any technical issue. The support that we're getting from the company is not great. There is also a cultural gap there because they're from Sri Lanka, and it is not easy. They're putting in a lot of effort, but they are not meeting our expectations."

"Basically, mTLS is a certificate-based communication protocol that WSO2 API Manager doesn't support."

"Integration is an area that needs to be improved."

"From what I have experienced from the versions I have tried, they could improve on the multi-tenant environments to allow some kind of SSO single sign-on between tenant."

"The price and the complexities attached to the solution are two areas of concern where improvements are required."

"For fresh graduates and engineers, the setup process can be very difficult."

"The solution could be more user friendly for engineers."

"The stability is pretty good, but it could be improved."

More WSO2 API Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Apigee could be less expensive. The solution can be purchased monthly or annually."

"If the budget is not a concern then I will choose to go with Apigee over WSA-2, but if it is then I would prefer the latter solution."

"The solution is a bit expensive. It's not for organizations in the early stages of their lifecycle but is more suited for mid- to enterprise-level platforms. Pricing varies by deployment model, with SaaS being the cheapest, costing around $100,000 per year for a subscription. For hybrid and on-prem deployments, the price increases. The on-prem model includes a license and additional installation and configuration professional service costs, which can be at least $40,000 to $60,000 for the initial setup. While it's not cheap, it offers long-term value and can be worthwhile."

"The tool is extremely expensive."

"My clients pay for a license."

"The cost increases as the usage increases."

"Apigee is subject to licensing fees."

"We have a contract for three years. I don't know the cost."

More Apigee pricing and cost advice

"There is a subscription-based pricing structure and also the open-sourced version available."

"The solution costs less than 20,000 euros a year. I'm not sure of the exact number."

"It's not expensive, but it could be cheaper."

"WSO2 API Manager is quite an expensive tool. I rate the product's pricing a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high."

"The challenge is the increasing pricing, which has led some customers to consider alternatives, like using Spring Boot solutions instead. The rising costs, especially as cores and usage increase, have been a concern, prompting some to migrate to other products."

"It is costly, around ten thousand per year, per instance"

"We have not opted for the paid version of WSO2 but we have implemented the free and open source WSO2 software to a great extent and it is working as per our expectation."

"My previous company paid about 1.2 million dollars, and my current company pays about 300k. Both companies are at the enterprise level."

More WSO2 API Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

What do you like most about Apigee?

We can customize the dashboard.

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?

It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?

One area for improvement is monitoring. Dashboards for application monitoring of the APIs would be beneficial, allowing us to check for faulty APIs.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?

We use WSO2 API Manager for our microservices and our APIs, both internally and externally.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apigee

Compared 28% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Apigee

Compared 10% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

More Apigee Competitors

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 17% of the time

Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 11% of the time

3scale API Management vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More WSO2 API Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apigee

March 2025

Download Apigee product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 API Manager

March 2025

Download WSO2 API Manager product report

Overview

Apigee is a platform for developing and managing APIs. Apigee offers an interface for your core services by wrapping them with a proxy layer which is then accessed by other developers. With Apigee, you can design and build APIs and then securely share their services and data without exposing any code.

Because app developers make HTTP requests to an API proxy rather than directly to your services, your services are separated from the developers. All the developer needs to know is the URL of the API proxy endpoint, necessary query parameters, authorization credentials (if they exist), and the response data format.

The API proxy isolates the app developer from your backend service. Therefore, you are free to change the service implementation if the public API remains consistent. By maintaining a consistent frontend API, existing client apps will continue to work regardless of changes on the backend.

Key capabilities of the Apigee API management platform include:

Security: Protect APIs, messages, and backends with configurable policies such as OAuth, API key verification, XML/JSON threat protection, and access control.
API gateway: Secure and mediate the traffic between clients and backends, and between a company’s APIs and the developers who use the APIs.
Developer portal: Attract and engage application developers, enabling them to discover, explore, purchase, and test APIs and register to access and use the APIs.
API console: The console helps developers learn and work with APIs.
API lifecycle management: Manage the process of designing, developing, publishing, deploying, and versioning APIs.
Automated documentation: Automate the development of API documentation and software development kits.
Machine learning: Utilize machine learning and analytics to generate actionable insights and reports.

API monitoring: Apigee offers monitoring tools for API troubleshooting, security, and optimization.

Reviews from Real Users:

Apigee stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its rich developer portal, its advanced analytics, and its central monitoring system.

Carlos R., a software architect at Caja Los Andes writes, “The central monitoring feature is the most valuable. It also provides security for the APIs and high availability for our use cases. Apigee is the best product in the industry in comparison to other API management solutions. It helps in fast development, which is a top point. It also supports a lot of industry standards and has excellent documentation.”

An associate vice president at a tech services company notes, “The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features. The authentication mechanisms are quite easily built into Apigee, which is something that most of the other products have also now started supporting.”

Google

WSO2 API Manager is a comprehensive platform that allows organizations to design, publish, and manage APIs.

It provides a centralized interface for API governance, security, and analytics.

With features like API monetization and developer portal, it enables businesses to drive innovation and create new revenue streams.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Adobe, advance.net, Amadeus, AT&T, Bechtel, Belly, Burberry, Chegg, Citrix, Dell, eBay, Equifax, GameStop, First Data, Globe, HCSC, Intralinks, Kao, Meredith, Mitchell, Orange, Pearson

1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. WSO2 API Manager

March 2025

Free Report: Apigee vs. WSO2 API Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Apigee vs. WSO2 API Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apigee vs. WSO2 API Manager report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.