Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025
Kong Gateway Enterprise and WSO2 API Manager compete in the API management space. Kong Gateway seems to have the upper hand in API security and flexibility, while WSO2 is recognized for ease of operation and deployment.
Features: Kong Gateway Enterprise is praised for its API security, scalability, and role-based access control (RBAC). It offers flexibility in configurations and extensive plugin support for tasks such as load balancing and rate limiting. WSO2 API Manager is valued for its ease of operation, API lifecycle management, and integration capabilities with external systems.
Room for Improvement: Kong Gateway Enterprise could enhance its pricing model, integration with other API solutions, and improve its developer portal and documentation. WSO2 API Manager needs to simplify user configurations, address complex licensing, and enhance user interface consistency and integration with modern tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kong Gateway Enterprise supports flexible deployment across hybrid, public, and private cloud environments, receiving positive technical support feedback despite some calls for faster response times. WSO2 API Manager is often deployed in on-premises environments and cloud setups; while its technical support is competent, installation and integration complexities remain a challenge.
Pricing and ROI: Kong Gateway Enterprise offers a range of pricing models with a cost-effective open-source version, though its enterprise pricing is viewed as expensive. WSO2 API Manager stands out for open-source affordability, although enterprise licensing can be high. However, it is still seen as cost-effective compared to competitors, with concerns over rising costs impacting migration decisions.
To learn more, read our detailed
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. WSO2 API Manager Report (Updated: July 2025).
