Microsoft Azure API Management vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

Microsoft and WSO2 are both solutions in the API Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9, while WSO2 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.7. Microsoft holds a 19.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to WSO2’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure API Management

Read 80 Microsoft Azure API Management reviews

27,012 Views
22,558 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

WSO2 API Manager

Read 40 WSO2 API Manager reviews

6,835 Views
4,902 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure API Management

WSO2 API Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Microsoft Azure API Management and WSO2 API Manager are competitive offerings in the API management space. Microsoft Azure API Management holds an advantage within the Azure ecosystem because of its seamless integration with Azure services, while WSO2 API Manager stands out with its open-source flexibility.

Features: Microsoft Azure API Management is valued for its integration with existing Azure services, Azure Active Directory integration, and ease of use for those already within the Microsoft environment. WSO2 API Manager offers open-source customization, comprehensive API lifecycle management, and strong security features, appealing to those needing flexibility across different environments.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure API Management could improve by enhancing support for versioning, better scalability, and introducing a more competitive pricing model. WSO2 API Manager would benefit from a more user-friendly interface, better documentation, and improved hybrid cloud integration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure API Management benefits from alignment with Azure cloud infrastructure, making deployment easier for Azure users, although customer service response can be slow. WSO2 API Manager offers broad deployment options including public, private, and on-premises setups, with customer service having room for growth in responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure API Management is considered expensive but offers performance and feature tiers suitable for enterprises integrated with Azure. WSO2 API Manager's open-source nature provides cost-effectiveness and flexibility, offering a viable alternative to proprietary solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,640 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure API Management

Ranking in API Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 API Manager

Ranking in API Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 19.4%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 4.7%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Rajiv Bala Balasubramanian

Specialist PCC at Danfoss

Efficiently manages and monetizes API

It is a scalable solution. You can add more computing power to your APM gateway. It also gives you the ability to have VNet integrations with your on-prem. It is one of the leading products in the API management space. It is not just software for users but software to handle requests. For example, for a B2C e-commerce store, all requests that users make from within the store pass through this API gateway. So it is defined by the number of requests to the API gateway, not by the number of actual users who use it. If you look at the number of requests, it would be a lot from all the different systems we have within Pampers.

Read full review

VishalSingh14

IT Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Easy to deploy APIs and easy to manage CORS configuration

I have used WSO2 Store and WSO2 API Manager at the architecture level. I worked on two versions, namely WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 and 5.7.0. I have also worked with WSO2 Identity Server versions 5.7 and 5.11. There are certain things that Apigee handles better than WSO2 API Manager. The user interface of WSO2 API Manager is much easier than that of Apigee. The scope of flexibility was much greater in Apigee. In WSO2 API Manager, we had little flexibility and were restricted to a specific software or tool. On the other hand, we had the scope of customization in Apigee.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Azure Active Directory Synchronization is quite good."

"I like API Management's ability to do hybrid cloud stuff."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the integration of CI/CD with the API gateway."

"The ease of use of the solution is excellent."

"It seems quite good so far. It handles our current workload well, and I'm optimistic it can scale effectively as our needs grow."

"Monitoring: It gives us a detailed overview of how clients are using the API and it allows us to see the consumption trends in real-time."

"We use this solution for API rate limiting and for its security features against DDoS."

"We're very satisfied with Azure API Management. We've had no issues with bugs, everything runs smoothly, and the connection between the cloud and the on-premise infrastructure was good."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pros

"The user interface is easy to navigate, and the documentation is extensive. It's open-source, so everything is available, and we can create what we need. That's not necessarily a feature, but it's an advantage."

"It is a scalable solution because it can be scaled horizontally and vertically."

"We could easily deploy APIs on WSO2 API Manager, and CORS configuration was easy to manage."

"Its open-source features are very good, especially for your production work."

"WSO2 API Manager is open-source, which offers a range of features not found in other open-source API tools."

"It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability."

"It's a good product."

"WSO2 API Manager has a user-friendly model."

More WSO2 API Manager pros

Cons

"Technical support could be more helpful and responsive."

"There is room for improvement in the user interface and workflow for hosting APIs, especially third-party APIs."

"It can be quite complex, somewhat lacking in flexibility."

"The scalability of this solution could be improved. The volume which the API Management task service can handle needs to be improved. Cost wise, this solution could be optimized."

"The user interface needs improvement."

"Azure API Management could be improved with better integration with all of Microsoft's tools."

"Performance issues from this platform need to be sorted out."

"Sometimes when immediate support is required, it isn't available."

More Microsoft Azure API Management cons

"For fresh graduates and engineers, the setup process can be very difficult."

"The initial setup can be difficult."

"The user interface could be a bit better."

"The pricing models offered by WSO2 API Manager could be more flexible and should offer different options so that more people can access them."

"They don't have different URLs for administrators."

"From a product perspective, the first thing is that although the documentation provided by WSO2 is good, it could be much better. We're in the middle of a complex migration, moving away from VMs to Kubernetes with the latest version of WSO2 and good documentation is essential to us right now."

"Lacks some new features and updated functionalities."

"The technical support must be improved."

More WSO2 API Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Because of our partner relationship, our pricing is pretty decent. But in general, if I compare pricing, I think the initial offer that we got from Microsoft until the relationship kicked in was more expensive than AWS. There were some unexpected expenses because we had to pause. This was due to our inexperience and because we were doing this significant public cloud migration for the first time. We were using SAP on a public cloud for the first time."

"Since everyone is isocentric here, it is reasonable for me."

"It's free for less than ten users. If you want to go beyond that, it's around $3.50 per user per month. If you want a DevOps integration, it's about $7.50 per user per month. Costs depend on the size, complexity, usage, and what facility you want to integrate. So, we use Microsoft Azure and have the entire DevOps and Visual Studio on the cloud. We get all three flavors for $7.50 per user per month."

"This is an expensive solution."

"The product pricing is reasonable."

"Microsoft is competitively priced."

"Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."

"There are no additional costs above the main license."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice

"We use the open-source version of WSO2 API Manager, there is no cost."

"WSO2 API Manager is a low-cost solution. It is one of the most affordable solutions."

"WSO2 API Manager is quite an expensive tool. I rate the product's pricing a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high."

"WSO2 API Manager is an open-source solution."

"It's not expensive, but it could be cheaper."

"We use the open-source version — the free version."

"There is a subscription-based pricing structure and also the open-sourced version available."

"WSO2 API Manager is a costly solution, and its pricing is not competitive enough compared to other products."

More WSO2 API Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?

Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?

It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?

One area for improvement is monitoring. Dashboards for application monitoring of the APIs would be beneficial, allowing us to check for faulty APIs.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?

We use WSO2 API Manager for our microservices and our APIs, both internally and externally.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 44% of the time

Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 23% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 5% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 5% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors

Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 24% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 15% of the time

Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 13% of the time

3scale API Management vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 6% of the time

More WSO2 API Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management

February 2025

Download Microsoft Azure API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 API Manager

January 2025

Download WSO2 API Manager product report

Also Known As

Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.

What key features does it offer?

Integration with Microsoft services ensures robust access control and user-friendly deployment.
Developer portal and documentation improve usability and learning.
Hybrid cloud support offers seamless on-premise connectivity.
Scalability and security features are well-regarded.
Centralized API library simplifies management.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Facilitates API lifecycle management enhancing user experience.
Simplifies authentication and subscription models.
Enhances data exchange and real-time monitoring.
Streamlines API mapping and orchestration across platforms.
Promotes flexibility and transparency in system integration.

Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.

Microsoft

WSO2 API Manager is a comprehensive platform that allows organizations to design, publish, and manage APIs.

It provides a centralized interface for API governance, security, and analytics.

With features like API monetization and developer portal, it enables businesses to drive innovation and create new revenue streams.

WSO2

Sample Customers

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas

1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager

January 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.