Microsoft Azure API Management and Kong Gateway Enterprise compete in the API management category. Azure holds an advantage due to its strong integration capabilities, while Kong excels in customization and performance efficiency.
Features: Microsoft Azure API Management offers seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, strong support for Azure Active Directory, and extensive monitoring capabilities. Kong Gateway Enterprise provides a lightweight performance benefit, a powerful plugin architecture, and customization options via Lua scripts.
Room for Improvement: Azure users request enhancements in API versioning, multi-tenant support, and integration with third-party solutions, citing limits in cloud-only deployment. Kong requires better support documentation, simplified pricing, and more user-friendly interfaces.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure is favored for its hybrid cloud deployment ease due to its integration with Azure services but needs improved customer support responsiveness. Kong, while strong in hybrid and private cloud deployments, scores lower in technical support and ease of contacting assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Azure's pricing is aligned with its rich features, but premium tiers and security costs are considered high. Azure's pay-as-you-go model is competitive, especially against Apigee. Kong, with its open-source base, provides affordable entry points, though enterprise licensing can be costly in some regions. Azure offers strong ROI in fast integration lead time, whereas Kong provides cost-effective solutions suitable for startups.
Proper configuration of the solution, implementation strategy and correct scaling tier selection are other factors that influence the ROI.
It helps connect all multi-environment applications to a single dashboard and give beautiful reports.
If I am working in AWS and with Azure, I see that Azure is much easier and helps save time while also being able to manage and deploy the API services.
The technical support from Kong Gateway Enterprise would be rated about eight, as we missed local technical support.
The documentation from Microsoft helps our company to solve issues on our own.
The initial support engineers are often not qualified.
I logged an incident, and it was resolved promptly within three hours.
The scalability of this solution would be rated about eight or nine.
I've worked with multiple tools from an observability perspective, such as Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Splunk, and Elasticsearch, and I find KQL and APIM amazing and filled with useful features.
It handles our current workload well, and I'm optimistic it can scale effectively as our needs grow.
There are no limitations to adding any number of devices.
I can't guarantee its stability or flexibility until all our databases and financial systems are integrated.
Microsoft Azure API Management is very stable.
With high scalability and availability, it supports many users and endpoints without significant issues.
More plugins for additional integrations would be helpful and openness for traditional development languages, such as .NET, because many enterprises are looking for .NET solutions or incorporating with .NET solutions.
The service is extensive and expensive, and this added flexibility would make it more manageable and less prone to errors.
It's quite expensive, which could be a barrier for some users.
Documentations for the product should include examples of implementation.
It's an expensive solution.
However, once you scale up to your full volume, it'll be more expensive.
Microsoft Azure is an expensive solution not for the large enterprises but for medium and small.
The most valuable features of Kong Gateway Enterprise are its seamless integration with Kubernetes and cloud, many plugins that can be incorporated in a solution, and its incorporation with low-code function systems.
The platform's most valuable features are its rule-based permissions and comprehensive API lifecycle management capabilities.
The ability to create a subscription model for APIs allows companies to monetize valuable data and share it securely.
The analytics phase of API Management is very beneficial for tracking API usage and identifying suspicious users.
Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.
Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.
Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.
What key features does it offer?Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.