Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache JMeter vs Worksoft Certify comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.7
Apache JMeter is cost-effective, offering significant savings and effectiveness for high-demand performance testing, surpassing HP Performance Center.
Sentiment score
7.6
Early adopters report significant labor, time, and cost savings, with up to 70% reduction in testing times and 583% ROI.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Apache JMeter support is community-driven and free, with varying response times; commercial options like BlazeMeter offer dedicated assistance.
Sentiment score
6.6
Worksoft Certify's customer support is generally responsive and improving, but varies in quality and faces occasional communication barriers.
The support for Apache JMeter is excellent.
Apache JMeter relies more on community support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Apache JMeter scales well with distributed testing, enhanced by cloud tools, but faces challenges at high loads and configurations.
Sentiment score
7.7
Worksoft Certify is scalable with advanced features but faces challenges like licensing, supporting large-scale projects and customizable output.
JMeter is highly scalable, easily handling increased loads through the use of multiple servers.
This restricts the number of users and necessitates increasing load agents or distributing the script across multiple machines.
Without location dependency, it's rated ten out of ten, but with dependency, it can be six out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Apache JMeter is stable but may require specific configurations for high loads; community support exists for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
7.2
Certify is stable and reliable for daily use, with occasional issues primarily related to specific components and resource limitations.
JMeter performs exceptionally well, especially in non-GUI mode, which supports high loads efficiently.
Several necessary features still need improvements, specifically in terms of reports and additional functionalities compared to other commercial tools.
 

Room For Improvement

Apache JMeter faces criticism for its complex GUI, performance issues, limited automation, documentation, and integration challenges.
Worksoft Certify needs improved performance, user interface simplification, better integration, enhanced technical support, and more intuitive documentation and training resources.
Enabling the conversion of scripts from commercial tools like LoadRunner or NeoLoad into JMeter scripts would also be advantageous.
With BlazeMeter, you can view the results in real-time.
Automating report analysis and supporting customized SLAs for script report generation could also enhance functionality.
 

Setup Cost

Apache JMeter is cost-effective and scalable, appealing to enterprises for its flexibility and extensive community support.
Worksoft Certify's licensing is costly but justified by stability, offering various options and flexible concurrent licensing for global teams.
Using JMeter helps us avoid additional costs for high-load testing since it is open-source and allows for unlimited virtual users at no extra cost.
It's a cost-effective solution.
Apache JMeter is completely free as it is open-source.
 

Valuable Features

Apache JMeter provides an open-source, scalable solution with extensive plugins, effective reporting, and strong community support for performance testing.
Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation with drag-and-drop, reusable tests, and seamless integration, enhancing efficiency and flexibility across environments.
It's useful for both the person conducting the test and the higher management, like project managers or senior executives, who may not know about the test.
JMeter facilitates scripting capabilities, which include options for Groovy scripts.
Despite being open source, it offers features comparable to paid tools.
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache JMeter
Ranking in API Testing Tools
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
92
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (1st), Load Testing Tools (1st)
Worksoft Certify
Ranking in API Testing Tools
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
66
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (8th), Test Automation Tools (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Apache JMeter is 6.4%, down from 14.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 8.2%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Swetha Mahasivbhattu - PeerSpot reviewer
Cost-effective performance and useful insights with an easy setup
It is very user-friendly. We just upload the script, and the dashboards are very informative. It's useful for both the person conducting the test and the higher management, like project managers or senior executives, who may not know about the test. They can easily view the results and gain valuable insights. Additionally, monetary benefits with Apache JMeter are notable since it doesn’t require a licensed version.
Shailesh-Parkhe - PeerSpot reviewer
Powerful automation tool with a user-friendly interface, codeless automation, and adaptability to complex business processes, particularly in SAP environments
The tool itself is highly effective, especially when it comes to comprehensibility for newcomers. Even during the initial learning phase, I found it remarkably user-friendly. It facilitates quick onboarding and training of new resources. It offers features for building automation scripts, such as search and certify capture. A notable advantage is that it doesn't rely on other tools like Micro Focus UFT or Micro Focus ALM for script execution. Worksoft can run independently without the need for support from Microsoft Office, although the option to use it for maintaining data exists. The tool also includes debugging features and comprehensive reporting capabilities, generating PDF reports for easy analysis.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
830,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
11%
Retailer
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?
Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...
What do you like most about Apache JMeter?
I appreciate JMeter's simplicity and power for performance testing.
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?
A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool.
 

Also Known As

JMeter
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
830,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.