Apache Spark vs IBM Spectrum Computing comparison

Apache and IBM are both solutions in the Hadoop category. Apache is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Apache holds a 18.3% mindshare in H, compared to IBM’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 57% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Apache Spark

Read 66 Apache Spark reviews

4,837 Views
1,064 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM Spectrum Computing

Read 9 IBM Spectrum Computing reviews

565 Views
153 Comparison Views

57% willing to recommend

Apache Spark

IBM Spectrum Computing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and IBM Spectrum Computing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Hadoop solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Spark vs. IBM Spectrum Computing Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark vs. IBM Spectrum Computing

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Spark

Ranking in Hadoop

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Compute Service (4th), Java Frameworks (2nd)

IBM Spectrum Computing

Ranking in Hadoop

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Hadoop category, the mindshare of Apache Spark is 18.3%, down from 20.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Spectrum Computing is 1.6%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Hadoop

Featured Reviews

Dunstan Matekenya

Data Scientist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Open-source solution for data processing with portability

Apache Spark is known for its ease of use. Compared to other available data processing frameworks, it is user-friendly. While many choices now exist, Spark remains easy to use, particularly with Python. You can utilize familiar programming styles similar to Pandas in Python, including object-oriented programming. Another advantage is its portability. I can prototype and perform some initial tasks on my laptop using Spark without needing to be on Databricks or any cloud platform. I can transfer it to Databricks or other platforms, such as AWS. This flexibility allows me to improve processing even on my laptop. For instance, if I'm processing large amounts of data and find my laptop becoming slow, I can quickly switch to Spark. It handles small and large datasets efficiently, making it a versatile tool for various data processing needs.

Read full review

OmarIsmail1

Infrastructure Technical Specialist II at Clicks Group

Senior Technical Specialist appreciates intelligent workload management, strong support, and scalability

The best features of IBM Spectrum Computing are common across many of their storage products. The software is solid, meaning that the code is stable. They take business seriously, which is what IBM stands for - International Business Machines. They always maintain a business-oriented approach in their software development. It's not simply clicking through interfaces; in IBM software, they consider their actions, process flows, and workflows around business processes. It requires understanding IBM and their methodology, as the software operates accordingly. I have utilized IBM Spectrum Computing's intelligent workload management feature. We use Insights, which is connected to the cloud. This provides AI capabilities for analyzing the configuration, offering smart recommendations on new code, warning about bugs in current code, and suggesting configuration improvements through its advisor tool. The predictive analytics feature in IBM Spectrum Computing enables optimal software performance through Insights. However, being a storage administrator requires foundational knowledge and understanding beyond these tools. For troubleshooting, it's efficient in spotting bottlenecks, but understanding the terms and metrics is essential as it provides answers that need interpretation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that it can handle multiple tasks parallelly. I also like the automation feature. JavaScript also helps with the parallel streaming of the library."

"Provides a lot of good documentation compared to other solutions."

"It provides a scalable machine learning library."

"We use it for ETL purposes as well as for implementing the full transformation pipelines."

"The solution has been very stable."

"The most valuable feature is the Fault Tolerance and easy binding with other processes like Machine Learning, graph analytics."

"It is useful for handling large amounts of data. It is very useful for scientific purposes."

"Features include machine learning, real time streaming, and data processing."

More Apache Spark pros

"We are satisfied with the technical support, we have no issues."

"The most valuable feature is the backup capability."

"I have utilized IBM Spectrum Computing's intelligent workload management feature through Insights, which is connected to the cloud."

"The most valuable aspect of the product is the policy driving resource management, to optimize the computing across data centers."

"The best features of IBM Spectrum Computing are common across many of their storage products."

"Easy to operate and use."

"This solution is working for both VTL and tape."

"Spectrum Computing's best features are its speed, robustness, and data processing and analysis."

More IBM Spectrum Computing pros

Cons

"When using Spark, users may need to write their own parallelization logic, which requires additional effort and expertise."

"Dynamic DataFrame options are not yet available."

"Stream processing needs to be developed more in Spark. I have used Flink previously. Flink is better than Spark at stream processing."

"The management tools could use improvement. Some of the debugging tools need some work as well. They need to be more descriptive."

"Apache Spark could potentially improve in terms of user-friendliness, particularly for individuals with a SQL background. While it's suitable for those with programming knowledge, making it more accessible to those without extensive programming skills could be beneficial."

"It's not easy to install."

"The solution needs to optimize shuffling between workers."

"It requires overcoming a significant learning curve due to its robust and feature-rich nature."

More Apache Spark cons

"Lack of sufficient documentation, particularly in Spanish."

"Spectrum Computing is lagging behind other products, most likely because it hasn't been shifted to the cloud."

"The deduplication software isn't quite up to speed with the market."

"The deduplication software isn't quite up to speed with the market. While IBM has excellent compression technology, specifically on their FlashCore modules, they lag behind competitors such as NetApp in deduplication capabilities."

"IBM's sales and support structure can be challenging."

"In Pakistan, IBM's disadvantage is the lack of OEM support and presence."

"SMB storage and HPC is not compatible and it should be supported by IBM Spectrum Computing."

"We'd like to see some AI model training for machine learning."

More IBM Spectrum Computing cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."

"They provide an open-source license for the on-premise version."

"Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."

"I did not pay anything when using the tool on cloud services, but I had to pay on the compute side. The tool is not expensive compared with the benefits it offers. I rate the price as an eight out of ten."

"Apache Spark is an open-source tool."

"It is quite expensive. In fact, it accounts for almost 50% of the cost of our entire project."

"The product is expensive, considering the setup."

"Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."

More Apache Spark pricing and cost advice

"Spectrum Computing is one of the most expensive products on the market."

"This solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

35%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Spark?

We use Spark to process data from different data sources.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Spark?

Apache Spark is open-source, so it doesn't incur any charges.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Spark?

There is complexity when it comes to understanding the whole ecosystem, especially for beginners. I find it quite complex to understand how a Spark job is initiated, the roles of driver nodes, work...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Spectrum Computing?

It is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Spectrum Computing?

IBM's sales and support structure can be challenging. To work on an IBM deal, you often need to involve multiple specialists, each knowledgeable about only part of the product, rather than having a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Spectrum Computing?

It is big on resilience and security. Their focus is on providing robust and secure solutions. Due to their high-end server models, IBM products are often more expensive than competitors. While IBM...

See all answers

Comparisons

Spring Boot vs Apache Spark

Compared 25% of the time

AWS Batch vs Apache Spark

Compared 11% of the time

SAP HANA vs Apache Spark

Compared 10% of the time

Spark SQL vs Apache Spark

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs Apache Spark

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache Spark Competitors

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs IBM Spectrum Computing

Compared 32% of the time

Cloudera Data Platform vs IBM Spectrum Computing

Compared 27% of the time

Morpheus vs IBM Spectrum Computing

Compared 26% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs IBM Spectrum Computing

Compared 15% of the time

More IBM Spectrum Computing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark

July 2025

Download Apache Spark product report

Buyer's Guide

Hadoop

July 2025

Download IBM Spectrum Computing product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Platform Computing

Overview

Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

Apache

IBM Spectrum Computing uses intelligent workload and policy-driven resource management to optimize resources across the data center, on premises and in the cloud. Now up to 150X faster and scalable to over 160,000 cores, IBM provides you with the latest advances in software-defined infrastructure to help you unleash the power of your distributed mission-critical high performance computing (HPC), analytics and big data applications as well as a new generation open source frameworks such as Hadoop and Spark.

IBM

Sample Customers

NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions

London South Bank University, Transvalor, Infiniti Red Bull Racing, Genomic

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark vs. IBM Spectrum Computing

July 2025

Free Report: Apache Spark vs. IBM Spectrum Computing

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Spark vs. IBM Spectrum Computing and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Spark vs. IBM Spectrum Computing report.

See our list of best Hadoop vendors.

We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.