AppNeta by Broadcom vs DX Performance Management comparison

AppNeta by Broadcom and DX Performance Management are both solutions in the DX NetOps category. AppNeta by Broadcom is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.2, while DX Performance Management is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. Additionally, 100% of AppNeta by Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of DX Performance Management users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

AppNeta by Broadcom and DX Performance Management compete in network performance and monitoring. AppNeta has advantages in pricing and support, while DX Performance Management is more feature-rich, compensating for its premium cost.

Features: AppNeta offers real-time network visibility, application path monitoring, and cloud compatibility for hybrid environments. DX Performance Management features advanced analytics, scalability, and predictive intelligence for precise performance insights. It focuses on predictive analytics for deeper data analysis and future performance planning.

Room for Improvement: AppNeta could enhance its analytics depth, expand its feature set for large enterprises, and improve scalability options. DX Performance Management may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing resource demands for setup, and lowering the upfront investment required.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AppNeta is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, making it suitable for businesses of various sizes with a flexible and less complex deployment model. DX Performance Management requires a more intricate deployment process but offers comprehensive support to address deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: AppNeta has lower initial setup costs and favorable ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. DX Performance Management requires a higher upfront investment but justifies this with long-term ROI through extensive capabilities and efficiency improvements.

To learn more, read our detailed AppNeta by Broadcom vs. DX Performance Management Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AppNeta by Broadcom vs. DX Performance Management

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Featured Reviews

ALEXANDRE VIANNA

CTO at Redeswirelessbrasil

May 3, 2024

Has a single dashboard, but is expensive

We use this solution to manage our mission environment The single dashboard is a valuable feature. The technical support needs improvement. The initial setup is straightforward. The solution is expensive. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of…

Read full review

Cliff Chapman

Architect at Linkstatus Ltd

Dec 15, 2022

Excellent support, easy configuration, and a reliable tool to know what the problem is and where the problem is

They should try and make diagnostics run a bit quicker. When the problem occurs on a network, AppNeta runs automatic diagnostics on the end-to-end path. The path it was testing only to the destination, it now runs the same test to all of the devices and all the intermediate devices. Depending on the number of intermediate devices, it can take several minutes to run. If we're trying to find or diagnose a problem that only lasts two or three minutes, it may be that the diagnostics is still running by the time the problem is cleared. The only thing, which I have also mentioned to AppNeta in the past, is that there should be much faster and much more lightweight diagnostics, which can be completed within 30 seconds or one minute, rather than in 5 to 10 minutes. Currently, when we have short-duration problems, we use a different tool, but we only use that different tool for short-duration problems. With AppNeta, as long as the problem exists for more than a few minutes, such as within 10 to 15 minutes, we can normally tell where the problem is. However, most of the problems that we deal with are intermittent. They're very rarely a permanent condition that needs to be addressed. That makes it more difficult to troubleshoot. We would look to see at least two or three events and hope they show the same results to raise our confidence that we've actually found the problem, rather than just a problem.

Read full review

Sandip Kheni

Lead Developer at STL - Sterlite Technologies Limited

Feb 24, 2023

The vertical database loads faster than any other product available

We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."

"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."

"This solution helps prove that, if we move to cloud, we'll still be as effective as we are on-premises."

"A lot of times one of the AppNeta transactions showed that there is an issue, whereas everything seemed to be working properly. Once we dug into it, we realized that it really was highlighting a problem that otherwise we would not have seen."

"We get complete, hop-by-hop visibility into the internet and we can know how much latency is taking place from one hop to another. That way, we know whether a particular hop belongs to the ISP, or that it is something owned by our own client's office, or is something to do with the SaaS network."

"The product helps us understand networks and user experience. It helps us to understand the issues."

"The solution's technical support is very good."

"Delivery and experience are valuable. The usage in terms of the traffic application captures and other similar things is also valuable."

"The main feature that we use is what they call Delivery, which is the testing of network paths end-to-end."

"One feature I like about CA Performance Management is the certification of the devices."

"Since the implementation of the tool, it has cut down on probably 60% of our outages and letting us know what is going on."

"The feature that is inherent to its core, of being able to graphically represent a trend and status, is nice."

"The out-of-the-box dashboards are valuable, in terms of being able to visualize performance data in ways that we haven't in the past."

"There is another component of the tool called Network Flow Analysis. It gives us the ability to troubleshoot issues which do not appear right away."

"I can get it to run a report showing, for instance, what root drives are in the critical range in terms of being full, like 90 percent full, and disseminate that information to the other areas of the organization."

"What is most useful is visibility."

"Scalability is the reason we bought the product to begin with. It was designed from the ground up for carrier-grade services, and we are in effect a MSP ourselves. So we were really interested in looking at something to be able to handle the multi-tenancy and scale as large as possible. This was the only solution that we really considered at that level."

More DX Performance Management pros

Cons

"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."

"The technical support needs improvement."

"I think some of the product's documentation has shortcomings and needs improvement."

"Having to deal with configuring the end devices using a USB stick is a bit cumbersome. It would be nice if there was a better way of handling that."

"Instead of integrating with other people, they should expand their interior capabilities."

"Cloud monitoring could be better. That's one of the biggest pain points for me. I have shared this feedback with them multiple times, but they're limited to some extent. That's one area where I've seen a problem."

"AppNeta by Broadcom needs to add more features to its dashboards. It also needs to work on providing out-of-the-box reports."

"I would like to see some advanced dashboard features. It could also be integrated with third-party tools. For example, an integration with a reporting solution would be helpful. Out-of-the-box, there are few dashboards or reports. What it does have is useful, but there should be additional dashboards."

"They should try and make diagnostics run a bit quicker. When the problem occurs on a network, AppNeta runs automatic diagnostics on the end-to-end path. The path it was testing only to the destination, it now runs the same test to all of the devices and all the intermediate devices. Depending on the number of intermediate devices, it can take several minutes to run. If we're trying to find or diagnose a problem that only lasts two or three minutes, it may be that the diagnostics is still running by the time the problem is cleared. The only thing, which I have also mentioned to AppNeta in the past, is that there should be much faster and much more lightweight diagnostics, which can be completed within 30 seconds or one minute, rather than in 5 to 10 minutes."

"DX Performance Management should increase high availability. If one of my two data centers goes offline and the other is operational, I need a seamless transition from the primary to the secondary data center. It's crucial to maintain consistent monitoring of the devices during this transition. Therefore, I require continuous, 24/7 monitoring of my system using this tool."

"Even though we can see when something is not available, it would also be it would be nice if some sort of alerting took place to that you could know immediately if something went down."

"We experience disconnections between the solutions own components."

"This tool gathers so much data, which makes it hard to convert over. To upgrade it, you really need the solution backed up. That is the issue that we are facing right now."

"Product has issue collecting IP SLA data."

"It would be helpful if CA provided online training for its customers."

"The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data."

"The solution could improve the database model. It is also not very good because they have a lot of interconnections with other data sources, such as NFA and VNA."

More DX Performance Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"Broadcom software is always a little expensive because they provide quality."

"I find the solution's price to be fairly good."

"I inherited this from a different version, and I haven't yet gone through a renewal because we had purchased three years upfront. So, to me, that still remains to be seen. Once it comes up for renewal, we'll see what happens. Especially because now it is Broadcom, it is going to change anyway."

"We typically don't get involved in the commercial side, but the list price is probably something like $3,000 for a small probe. However, that gives all of the features that the probe can do, whether or not you use them. In the old days, up until two or three years ago, each of the separate features was a separately licensable module so that you could add things that you wanted, and you didn't have to add things that you didn't want. They've changed all that now, and everything the probe can do is a part of the base license."

"The small probe is probably around $3,000 and the very large probe that they make for massive data centers might be $50,000 or $60,000. It's a subscription model, so the payment is per year."

"It's worth the money."

"AppNeta by Broadcom is not expensive."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DX NetOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

44%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

The solution is expensive. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

The technical support needs improvement.

See all answers

What open source tool can one use to measure bandwidth from one's upstream service provider?

One I am looking closely at is AppNeta. They have an appliance that can digest the flow and do a better job than N...

See all answers

What do you like most about AppNeta?

The product helps us understand networks and user experience. It helps us to understand the issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppNeta?

AppNeta by Broadcom is not expensive.

See all answers

What do you like most about DX Performance Management?

The tool helps us understand network performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?

The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

DX Performance Management should increase high availability. If one of my two data centers goes offline and the other...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 37% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 31% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 21% of the time

InfluxDB vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 12% of the time

More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Competitors

ThousandEyes vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 46% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 23% of the time

DX NetOps vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 15% of the time

More AppNeta by Broadcom Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

November 2024

Download Juniper Mist Premium Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

AppNeta by Broadcom

November 2024

Download AppNeta by Broadcom product report

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

November 2024

Download DX Performance Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

CA Performance Management

Learn More

Juniper

Broadcom

Overview

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is a comprehensive network analytics solution that provides organizations with valuable insights into their network performance and user experience. The primary use case of this product is to enable IT teams to proactively monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize their network infrastructure.

The most valuable functionality of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is its AI-driven insights and recommendations. Leveraging machine learning algorithms, it analyzes vast amounts of network data to identify anomalies, predict potential issues, and suggest remediation actions. This proactive approach helps organizations minimize network downtime, improve user experience, and optimize network performance.

By providing real-time visibility into network performance, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics helps organizations quickly identify and resolve network issues. It offers detailed analytics on network traffic, application performance, and user behavior, allowing IT teams to pinpoint the root cause of problems and take immediate action. This not only reduces troubleshooting time but also enhances overall network reliability.

Furthermore, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics enables organizations to optimize their network infrastructure. It provides insights into network capacity utilization, application usage patterns, and user behavior, allowing IT teams to make informed decisions about network design, resource allocation, and capacity planning. This helps organizations to ensure that their network is efficiently utilized and can support the growing demands of their users.

AppNeta is the leader in proactive end-user performance monitoring solutions built for the distributed digital enterprise. With AppNeta, IT and Network Ops teams can assure continuous and exceptional delivery of business-critical applications. AppNeta’s SaaS-based solutions give IT teams essential application and network performance data, allowing them to constantly monitor user experience across any application, network, data center or cloud.

For more information, visit www.appneta.com.

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Ebay, Citrix, National Instruments, Marriott, AT&T, Bon-Ton, McDonald's, Netflix, PayPal, Uber, QAD

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Buyer's Guide

AppNeta by Broadcom vs. DX Performance Management

October 2024

Free Report: AppNeta by Broadcom vs. DX Performance Management

Find out what your peers are saying about AppNeta by Broadcom vs. DX Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AppNeta by Broadcom vs. DX Performance Management report.

See our list of best DX NetOps vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all DX NetOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.