Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Appvance AIQ Platform vs Fortify Software Security Center comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Fortify Software Security Center is scalable but challenging, efficiently serving limited users primarily within security teams.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Fortify Software Security Center is challenging to implement, with poor documentation, limited support, integration issues, and a complex interface.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.0
Users find Fortify Software Security Center stable and reliable, despite implementation challenges, with a high confidence rating.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Fortify Software's support is criticized for being slow and unclear, causing users to prefer direct email for assistance.
 

Categories and Ranking

Appvance AIQ Platform
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
49th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (21st), Functional Testing Tools (30th), Load Testing Tools (23rd), Regression Testing Tools (16th), Test Automation Tools (32nd), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd)
Fortify Software Security C...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
27th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Appvance AIQ Platform is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user129477 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Emulation allows for performance testing of geographically-distributed users.
It is a great performance testing tool. The most valuable feature of the tool is its Avatar technology. Scripting is really fast, compared to other tools. It works for almost all major protocols, platforms and browsers. It makes complex scenarios simple, and we need minimal custom coding. It also provides features for Network Emulation, which is quite helpful in testing the performance for geographically-distributed users. Appvance can provide information from end to end (back-end and front-end), which makes it surpass other tools. The tool provides protocol level as well as browser level response time. And it can be integrated with major monitoring tools. As it is a web-based tool, it makes it easy to access anywhere anytime. All the team members can access the common information easily.
Kibeom Kim - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a good collaboration function and is a centralized software solution
We use the product to scan results, store and display data from Azure, identify scan results, analyze, report, and access company data The platform's most effective for identifying vulnerabilities features are the Fortify audit workbench and the collaboration module, which allow developers and…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
14%
Insurance Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Micro Focus Software Security Center?
You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?
As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available. I would rate the pricing a seven.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?
The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive.
 

Also Known As

Appvance
Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cisco, Bell Canada, CBS, UBC, PepsiCo, 7-11, BenefitVision, Kabbage, Catalent Pharmaceuticals, McKesson, Veritas, Cherwell, QAT Global, Sony, SiriusXM, CoPart, Auto Parts Alliance, PPD
Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.