Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

OpenText and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0, while Seceon is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.4. OpenText holds a 1.5% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.
OpenText Enterprise Securit...
Read 98 OpenText Enterprise Security Manager reviews
  • 2,664 Views
  • 2,557 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Seceon Open Threat Manageme...
Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews
  • 1,164 Views
  • 1,152 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform both compete in the enterprise security domain. While OpenText has an advantage in pricing and support, Seceon stands out with its strong feature set.

Features: OpenText Enterprise Security Manager provides comprehensive analytics, advanced incident response capabilities, and excellent scalability for large IT environments. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is known for its real-time threat detection, AI-driven automation, and seamless integration with multiple solutions, catering to proactive security needs.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its AI capabilities, streamline deployment processes, and simplify the user interface to make it more intuitive. Seceon would benefit from expanding its documentation, improving initial setup support, and enhancing customization options for diverse user requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Seceon offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment with responsive customer service, simplifying the process significantly. OpenText, although requiring more setup time, provides extensive support that is beneficial for managing complex deployments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText involves a higher initial setup cost but assures a strong ROI through its integrated solutions. Seceon has a cost-effective setup with compelling ROI, focusing on efficient threat management and reduced operating costs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Enterprise Securit...
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
22nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
98
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Seceon Open Threat Manageme...
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
25th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager1.5%
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform0.8%
Other97.7%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Ranade - PeerSpot reviewer
Excels at performing regression and correlation on the data
ArcSight is a legacy technology, and many customers want AI-powered technologies integrated with it. That hasn't been done yet, but ArcSight needs to catch up with the newer solutions and technologies available in the market. It can't just rely on the legacy technology from 2010 or 2012. You can't run that in 2024. It's a legacy technology with its own limitations. Customers often face issues that other software or newer solutions can resolve easily. That's the main challenge we face from customers right now. So, the only concerns are that AI needs to be integrated and scalability improved. Those are the main areas to be improved.
Read full review
TamimKhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers
We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"​It is a vital tool for live monitoring and helps us to understand the traffic alerts of any major issue on the network, thereby reducing hacking attempts."
"This process has helped to improve our organization because we have centralized the intra-group security equipment logs."
"What I found most valuable in ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is its good integration with third-party products. The solution also has good core capabilities."
"ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is very cheap compared to other tools."
"The solution is pretty stable."
"The filters and the ability to do what you want are the most valuable features. There is nothing that you cannot do in this solution. It has all the features, which makes it very dynamic."
"The webpage algorithm is the most valuable feature because it was the fastest feature for searching the logs, events, and correlation."
"ArcSight is customizable. You can integrate just about anything. I also like the ease of use."
More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pros
"It is effective because it has threat intelligence from across the world and constantly checks and updates for new threats."
"The solution is stable."
"The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively."
"I like that it's an AI-based platform. The most valuable feature is that it's a comprehensive solution. Most tools in the marketplace are comprised of miscellaneous items. They fail to provide real-time remediation features. However, with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform, anything you can think of in cybersecurity, like auto-remediation, real-time response, and even on-premise components, is available in a single platform. So, it's perfect for finance and healthcare who don't want to share their data with a third party like the cloud. You can have this on-premise as well. So, the expenditure will be lower as less human intervention is required."
"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform notifies only genuine alerts. It offers plenty of options that are suitable for MSPs."
"We only recently started using Seceon, so we aren't taking advantage of all its features yet. We have enabled some proactive alerts about utilization and bottlenecks from high traffic."
"You can use different solutions in a single platform which is very easy and attractive for customers."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its artificial intelligence."
More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros
 

Cons

"The stability isn't quite perfect. We occasionally run into problems."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"The user interface of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager could improve. It is not very good. Additionally, they could integrate the web interface better."
"The biggest requirement is that there is no cloud solution for this product yet. They need to create a cloud version. It's the biggest thing they can do to make the solution better."
"The centralized dashboard for the hybrid cloud environment needs to be more focused. It needs to be redefined because it's missing most of the information. It should be a little bit easy to use. Currently, integration with various applications and connectors is not that easy. Deployment is easy, but integration is not that easy. ArcSight also has a very high bandwidth consumption to pull the local servers. It should have some kind of better process or ability to transfer files from on-premises to the cloud, from the cloud to on-premises, and from a cloud to another cloud."
"The way that scaling is set up isn't very cost-effective."
"Administration of ArcSight is not an easy job. The admin needs to be well experienced in it to identify the root cause and fix it."
"The security area has room for improvement."
More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager cons
"The product could be improved by including sandboxing capabilities in the next release."
"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform sells some add-ons as part of the whole suite but not individually. If they sold them individually, they could potentially attract more business."
"The dashboard has always been an issue."
"The management console could use some enhancements."
"Certain features, such as DLP, need to be improved as they are superficial and not in-depth."
"It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable. Not many customers are willing to have a dedicated server with two CPUs and one TB of memory. The cost of this is huge for a smaller organization."
"The product should improve the triggering rate."
"The SOP they provided wasn't great. They offered training over Sherp Virtualization, and the Seceon leadership visited our location to explain everything in detail, but the documentation and training could be better. It isn't as effective as it could be. There's some room for improvement there."
More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Aggregation can help a lot in pushing down licensing costs."
"Customers without a ton of resources to dedicate to deployment may be better served by a managed ArcSight service."
"The licensing cost is affordable if you get an enterprise license. The licensing is based on EPS, so you can probably provide a package of license for multiple ESMs with their correlational end fees. It is cost-effective."
"There is a license required for this solution."
"We have a license to use this solution. The price of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager is expensive."
"The cost of the solution is not very high, although hiring a qualified analyst to work with the product is expensive."
"The solution is super expensive. At our organization size and license model, I think the price is average to what anyone else would charge us."
"The pricing is great compared to others."
More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pricing and cost advice
"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."
"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."
"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."
"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."
"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."
"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."
"The price is quite reasonable."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Jun 28, 2015
Qradar vs. ArcSight
Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Educational Organization
7%
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Performing Arts
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business37
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise57
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?
In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...
See all answers
What do you like most about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?
We utilize ArcSight ESM for real-time threat detection in our organization. We have custom rules that we've developed on top of the WAN services, along with scheduled licensing activities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is very cheap compared to other tools. It is worth the investment if you are considering the cost.
See all answers
What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?
The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?
The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?
There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Trellix ESM vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Logo
Trellix ESM vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
Compared 19% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
Compared 11% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
Compared 9% of the time
SurfWatch Labs SurfWatch vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Logo
SurfWatch Labs SurfWatch vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
Compared 6% of the time
Elastic Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Logo
Elastic Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
Compared 6% of the time
More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Competitors
Wazuh vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
Wazuh vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 17% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 13% of the time
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 13% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 13% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 12% of the time
More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
August 2025
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager reportDownload OpenText Enterprise Security Manager product report
Buyer's Guide
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
August 2025
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reportDownload Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight
Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management
 

Overview

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager enables real-time threat detection through scalable and adaptable solutions, integrating seamlessly with multiple platforms for complex security scenarios across different environments.

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers extensive security monitoring capabilities, combining log analysis and incident management to enhance cybersecurity and compliance. Its powerful event correlation engine provides real-time alerts for rapid incident response. Users benefit from customizable dashboards and comprehensive log collection, making it a significant tool in the SIEM market. Flexible deployment options cater to both on-premises and cloud environments, supporting enterprises in managing IT infrastructure and threat detection efficiently.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?
  • Event Correlation Engine: Real-time threat detection with advanced correlation capabilities.
  • Scalability: Adapts to enterprise-level demands and complex security needs.
  • Integration: Seamlessly integrates with multiple platforms and third-party tools.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Tailored views and active lists enhance user experience.
  • Advanced Alerting: Provides timely incident response and security alerts.
Why should users look for reviews when evaluating OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?
  • Timely Incident Responses: Fast alerting and action against threats.
  • User-Friendly Experience: Customizable dashboards simplify monitoring tasks.
  • Comprehensive Security Management: Integrated log management and threat detection across domains.
  • Adaptability and Scalability: Supports both on-premises and cloud deployments.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and energy, OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is implemented for monitoring critical systems and ensuring compliance with regulatory needs. Enterprises leverage its capabilities for forensic investigations and active threat management, serving as a central hub for cybersecurity operations across diverse IT infrastructures.

OpenText

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response. 

With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructure, consolidating data from various sources for centralized monitoring and analysis. 

Its threat intelligence feeds and behavioral analytics enable the identification of both known and unknown threats, ensuring comprehensive protection against advanced cyber attacks. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform empowers security teams with actionable insights, enabling them to prioritize and respond to threats swiftly. With its automated remediation capabilities, it minimizes the impact of attacks and reduces response time. The platform also offers customizable reporting and compliance management features, facilitating regulatory compliance and providing stakeholders with comprehensive security status updates. 

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a robust and scalable solution that caters to the evolving cybersecurity needs of organizations across industries.

Seceon
 

Sample Customers

Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.
Caduceus, SUNY
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
September 2025
Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.