ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

OpenText and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. OpenText is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.1, while Seceon is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 1.3% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Seceon users who would recommend it.

ArcSight Enterprise Securit...

Read 96 ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) reviews

3,310 Views
1,648 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Read 12 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews

1,378 Views
587 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ArcSight Enterprise Securit...

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform are two prominent cybersecurity solutions. ArcSight ESM generally has the upper hand in customer service and scale, whereas Seceon stands out for its innovative features and ease of deployment.

Features: ArcSight ESM offers comprehensive security information and event management capabilities, advanced analytics, and extensive customization options. Seceon features automated threat detection, real-time threat intelligence, and efficient remediation processes. Seceon’s automation and real-time capabilities give it a slight edge.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight ESM could improve on integration complexity, system intuitiveness, and reducing deployment time. Seceon could enhance user activity monitoring, reporting functionalities, and scaling infrastructure. ArcSight needs easier usage, while Seceon needs better analytics depth.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight ESM deployment is complex and time-consuming, requiring extensive infrastructure. However, its customer service is praised for responsiveness. Seceon has a straightforward deployment process and efficient customer support, but infrastructure scaling is an issue. Seceon’s ease of deployment provides an operational advantage.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight ESM has higher setup costs due to its extensive features and enterprise focus, yet users report substantial ROI from its robust security capabilities. Seceon offers a more attractive pricing structure with quicker ROI due to lower initial investment and automatic threat detection. ArcSight provides strong ROI for large-scale deployments, while Seceon appeals to those seeking cost-efficiency and faster returns.

To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Enterprise Securit...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

22nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is 1.3%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Ramnesh Dubey

Solutions Architect at Ericsson

Allows for monitoring logs according to industry standards within ESM but has a total capacity capped at 12 TB, limiting real-time data retention periods

The first limitation is with the ArcSight Data Storage Manager (ADSM). ArcSight's total capacity is currently capped at 12 TB. This becomes an issue if a customer needs a longer real-time data retention period, such as exceeding 90 days or reaching a year or even ten months. Increasing the disk space beyond 12 TB is not currently possible. So, increasing the storage capacity is one area for improvement. Additionally, the real-time data retention is limited due to the 12 TB restriction. Depending on the Events Per Second (EPS) you receive, you might only be able to retain data for seven to ten days. Overall, the 12 TB limit is the main issue we face in terms of maximizing real-time data storage. Moreover, there are a few improvements I would like to see in future releases. My main suggestion for ArcSight is to simplify the deployment process. Currently, the installation process is quite complex. There are various components involved, including transformations, multiple installations, and containerization for various components. Ideally, I'd recommend that ArcSight allow the entire installation, including the ESM and database, to be completed within a single unified setup process for a streamlined experience. Additionally, having readily available and well-organized documentation for the step-by-step installation process would be incredibly helpful. I would also like to see better support.

Read full review

Dipesh Jain

Manager IT at Power Finance Corporation Ltd

Has the ability to categorize alerts and reporting dashboards are useful

The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively. The ability to categorize alerts and the reporting dashboards are valuable features. AI-driven analysis aids in identifying critical alerts, and real-time threat detection improves our response time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This process has helped to improve our organization because we have centralized the intra-group security equipment logs."

"I think that the overall experience with this solution is good, but in particular, I think that the dashboards are quite interactive."

"The most valuable feature of ArcSight ESM is its ease of use."

"Stable solution with good customer service support."

"It is a robust product and has multiple valuable features."

"The real-time analysis adds value."

"Once the rules are defined, it becomes easy to detect changes and generate automated logs."

"Once the rules are defined, it is capable of detecting minute changes in the systems, which are effectively based on the entries in the log."

More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) pros

"The solution is very cost-effective compared to Splunk and LogRhythm."

"The most valuable features are behaviour analytics, threat intelligence, endpoint detection, and response features."

"I like that it's an AI-based platform. The most valuable feature is that it's a comprehensive solution. Most tools in the marketplace are comprised of miscellaneous items. They fail to provide real-time remediation features. However, with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform, anything you can think of in cybersecurity, like auto-remediation, real-time response, and even on-premise components, is available in a single platform. So, it's perfect for finance and healthcare who don't want to share their data with a third party like the cloud. You can have this on-premise as well. So, the expenditure will be lower as less human intervention is required."

"The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively."

"The main thing is the value proposition. It is one of the most sophisticated yet affordable solutions that I've come across. It is also one of the easiest-to-manage yet comprehensive solutions for a SOC analyst. Its customizations are really good, and it has a lot of integrations. It is multi-tenant and very fast to onboard. Its stability is 100%. We've never had an outage with it. It doesn't require extensive hardware resources. Its level of support is also very good. They have a very responsive technical team."

"You can use different solutions in a single platform which is very easy and attractive for customers."

"It is effective because it has threat intelligence from across the world and constantly checks and updates for new threats."

"It offers a holistic approach with multiple solutions blended into one platform."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros

Cons

"When I asked our networking juniors for a comparison between LogRhythm and ArcSight, they said that both platforms are almost the same. It is just that LogRhythm is more modern with a digital platform, which probably gives it some advantage over ArcSight. ArcSight is a very old and mature product that is running on an old platform. It is an old legacy platform. In terms of new features, it just requires platform upgrades so that it becomes lighter and easily adaptable, specifically in the cloud. It would be a good thing if they can also make reporting easier."

"I would like to have a feature that gives us an entire report listing what devices are integrated."

"The first limitation is with the ArcSight Data Storage Manager (ADSM). ArcSight's total capacity is currently capped at 12 TB. This becomes an issue if a customer needs a longer real-time data retention period, such as exceeding 90 days or reaching a year or even ten months. Increasing the disk space beyond 12 TB is not currently possible."

"Currently lacks SOAR feature."

"The API integration could be better, and I'd like to see more machine-learning capabilities in the future."

"The visualization is not very good compared to Splunk."

"There could be more API features for extracting logs on different devices included in the product."

"The onboarding process for this solution could be better. It also needs a better GUI."

More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) cons

"It would be better if they offered global coverage."

"It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft."

"The product could be improved by including sandboxing capabilities in the next release."

"It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable. Not many customers are willing to have a dedicated server with two CPUs and one TB of memory. The cost of this is huge for a smaller organization."

"The SOP they provided wasn't great. They offered training over Sherp Virtualization, and the Seceon leadership visited our location to explain everything in detail, but the documentation and training could be better. It isn't as effective as it could be. There's some room for improvement there."

"The dashboard has always been an issue."

"Certain features, such as DLP, need to be improved as they are superficial and not in-depth."

"The management console could use some enhancements."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Customers without a ton of resources to dedicate to deployment may be better served by a managed ArcSight service."

"There is a license required for this solution."

"The cost of the solution is not very high, although hiring a qualified analyst to work with the product is expensive."

"We're paying a fee for an MSSP, and the cost of the total cost of ArcSight ESM was approximately three to four million dollars a year. The price was less than similar solutions. We did not have additional fees."

"ArcSight can be a little bit expensive because of the area that we work in and the cost. Licensing is mostly on a yearly basis, not monthly."

"Aggregation can help a lot in pushing down licensing costs."

"We have a license to use this solution. The price of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager is expensive."

"Pricing is good, I'd rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being low price. It's better than Splunk and IBM QRadar because their pricing is based on EPS."

More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) pricing and cost advice

"The price is quite reasonable."

"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."

"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."

"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."

"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."

"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at Deloitte & Touche

Jun 28, 2015

Qradar vs. ArcSight

Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

28%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?

In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

We utilize ArcSight ESM for real-time threat detection in our organization. We have custom rules that we've developed on top of the WAN services, along with scheduled licensing activities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

ArcSight is expensive.

See all answers

What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The implementation cost is extra, but the license cost is reasonable with no hidden costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

Certain features, such as DLP, need to be improved as they are superficial and not in-depth. Additionally, the non-core features need to increase in depth.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)

Compared 20% of the time

Trellix ESM vs ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Security vs ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)

Compared 8% of the time

Wazuh vs ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)

Compared 7% of the time

More ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 22% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 13% of the time

ManageEngine Log360 vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Wazuh vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 12% of the time

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)

December 2024

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) report

Download ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

November 2024

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report

Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight

Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management

Learn More

OpenText

Seceon

Overview

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is a powerful SIEM solution for analyzing, collecting, correlating, and reporting on security event information. ArcSight ESM analyzes information from all of your data sources while helping your organization maintain high security. In addition, the solution is very customizable and enables users to create their own company-specific rule sets to automatically trigger instant alerts.

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Features

Real-time threat detection
Visualization and reporting capabilities
Patented log management
Personalized dashboards
Scalable event monitoring
Seamless integration with your existing SOC tools
Behavior profiling
Data and user monitoring
Application monitoring
Analytics
Deployment/support simplicity

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Benefits

Some of the benefits of using ESM include:

Real-time information: ArcSight ESM can correlate data from any source in real-time to detect incidents before they become a breach.

Compliance: Optional compliance packs enable packaged reports for PCI, SOX, and IT Governance.

Security analytics: With ArcSight ESM, you can build and maintain a security operation center (SOC) through big data security analytics.

Integration: ArcSight ESM allows you to integrate SOC with network operations, service desk, CMDB, business intelligence, Hadoop, email security, application security, threat feeds, and more.

Speed: ArcSight ESM provides excellent speed of event collection with patented log management tools.

Advanced detection: ArcSight ESM can detect unusual or unauthorized activities as they occur, preventing business disruptions.

Decrease threat exposure: By implementing ArcSight ESM, you reduce threat exposure because the solution detects threats in real time.

Operational efficiency: ArcSight ESM makes it possible for you to automate responses with ArcSight’s native SOAR, which saves your organization time, and therefore increases your operational efficiency.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) users.

A Head of Professional Services at a computer software company says, “The simplicity of the solution is the most valuable aspect of the product. The product is quite mature. It's been around for a long time. The integration is easy for the most part.”

A Managing partner at a tech services company states that the solution is “Good at consolidating logs, fairly stable, and can scale.”

PeerSpot user Abbasi P., Vice President Derivatives Ops IT at a financial services firm, explains, “The user interfaces are quite good and speedy, and I like the consoles too. The typology and the setup are also good.”

A Chief Technological Officer at a tech services company says, "It is a very useful tool for intelligence building because it has many use cases and many rule sets."

An Associate Vice President at a consumer goods company comments, “We primarily use the solution for its technology including its independent logs, and those types of things. The solution offers very good monitoring. The product's log management and event management capabilities are excellent. There are a lot of really good analytical components. It helps us focus on analysis.”

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response.

With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructure, consolidating data from various sources for centralized monitoring and analysis.

Its threat intelligence feeds and behavioral analytics enable the identification of both known and unknown threats, ensuring comprehensive protection against advanced cyber attacks. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform empowers security teams with actionable insights, enabling them to prioritize and respond to threats swiftly. With its automated remediation capabilities, it minimizes the impact of attacks and reduces response time. The platform also offers customizable reporting and compliance management features, facilitating regulatory compliance and providing stakeholders with comprehensive security status updates.

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a robust and scalable solution that caters to the evolving cybersecurity needs of organizations across industries.

Sample Customers

Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.

Caduceus, SUNY

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

December 2024

Free Report: ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.