OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

OpenText and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. OpenText is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.0, while Seceon is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.4. OpenText holds a 1.6% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Read 98 OpenText Enterprise Security Manager reviews

2,595 Views
2,491 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews

1,181 Views
1,157 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform are both leaders in the enterprise security domain, competing in areas such as integration, threat detection, and management. While OpenText holds strength in integration capabilities, Seceon's innovative approach in threat detection sets it apart, especially for businesses focused on cutting-edge threat intelligence solutions.

Features: OpenText excels in offering robust integration with existing infrastructures, compliance assurance, and efficient data management. Seceon stands out with real-time threat detection using AI and machine learning, proactive defense strategies, and a strong threat analytics focus.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its user interface and broaden support for third-party tools. Seceon could focus on improving its integration adaptability and increase documentation resources. Both platforms may benefit from refining their scalability to better handle growing organizational needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides a streamlined deployment process with comprehensive documentation and dedicated support. Seceon offers a flexible deployment tailored to specific needs with a customer-centric service approach.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers a cost-effective initial setup with strong ROI through its integration potential. Seceon's higher initial investment is justified by its superior threat detection capabilities leading to significant ROI in advanced security endeavors.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Enterprise Securit...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager	1.6%
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform	0.8%
Other	97.6%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Ramnesh Dubey

Solutions Architect at Ericsson

Allows for monitoring logs according to industry standards within ESM but has a total capacity capped at 12 TB, limiting real-time data retention periods

The first limitation is with the ArcSight Data Storage Manager (ADSM). ArcSight's total capacity is currently capped at 12 TB. This becomes an issue if a customer needs a longer real-time data retention period, such as exceeding 90 days or reaching a year or even ten months. Increasing the disk space beyond 12 TB is not currently possible. So, increasing the storage capacity is one area for improvement. Additionally, the real-time data retention is limited due to the 12 TB restriction. Depending on the Events Per Second (EPS) you receive, you might only be able to retain data for seven to ten days. Overall, the 12 TB limit is the main issue we face in terms of maximizing real-time data storage. Moreover, there are a few improvements I would like to see in future releases. My main suggestion for ArcSight is to simplify the deployment process. Currently, the installation process is quite complex. There are various components involved, including transformations, multiple installations, and containerization for various components. Ideally, I'd recommend that ArcSight allow the entire installation, including the ESM and database, to be completed within a single unified setup process for a streamlined experience. Additionally, having readily available and well-organized documentation for the step-by-step installation process would be incredibly helpful. I would also like to see better support.

Read full review

TamimKhan

Solution Architect at Tiger IT Bangladesh Limited

Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most useful features are directories, price, and live reporting."

"ArcSight ESM allows us to find if someone is doing an administrative operation at inappropriate times of day or trying to do something they're not allowed to."

"Feature-rich solution which provides better network visibility for improved security"

"What I found most valuable in ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is its good integration with third-party products. The solution also has good core capabilities."

"The correlation feature is good."

"The user interfaces are quite good and speedy."

"ArcSight is customizable. You can integrate just about anything. I also like the ease of use."

"On the positive side, ArcSight ESM's performance was excellent. It was very fast when writing queries. It provided good performance monitoring and had built-in rules to show which rules triggered most often and impacted performance. This performance monitoring was well-implemented."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pros

"The most valuable features are behaviour analytics, threat intelligence, endpoint detection, and response features."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its artificial intelligence."

"The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable."

"You can use different solutions in a single platform which is very easy and attractive for customers."

"It is effective because it has threat intelligence from across the world and constantly checks and updates for new threats."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform notifies only genuine alerts. It offers plenty of options that are suitable for MSPs."

"It offers a holistic approach with multiple solutions blended into one platform."

"I like that it's an AI-based platform. The most valuable feature is that it's a comprehensive solution. Most tools in the marketplace are comprised of miscellaneous items. They fail to provide real-time remediation features. However, with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform, anything you can think of in cybersecurity, like auto-remediation, real-time response, and even on-premise components, is available in a single platform. So, it's perfect for finance and healthcare who don't want to share their data with a third party like the cloud. You can have this on-premise as well. So, the expenditure will be lower as less human intervention is required."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros

Cons

"In other products, I have found that they use some kind of GUI that is drag and drop. While in ArcSight they use still scripting. They should keep scripting because some people prefer scripting but they should have the option for those who prefer using drag and drop."

"The only concern is that AI needs to be integrated"

"I would like to have a feature that gives us an entire report listing what devices are integrated."

"We would like the ability to easily identify either unused resources or those that are being used sub-optimally."

"HPE ArcSight has a quite steep learning curve."

"What could be improved in ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is its analytics feature. That feature should be more powerful and have more correlation in terms of AI/ML, though MicroFocus has done a good job in adding analytics to ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) which has become a big draw to customers. What I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is the addition of AI/ML features."

"Could benefit from a more modern interface."

"They should try to include business logic vulnerabilities in the SIEM tool."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager cons

"The product should improve the triggering rate."

"The management console could use some enhancements."

"The product could be improved by including sandboxing capabilities in the next release."

"It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft."

"For small to medium-sized customers, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is good. However, for large enterprises, it is not as effective."

"It would be better if they offered global coverage."

"We are at the client’s end, offering services. They don’t know about security rules and benchmarks. We are working on the discovery and remediation but we don’t really have the intelligence that was available while working with other tools. Human working is also very essential for the solution. The automatic session is impossible to play since it needs to touch Redfin for further analysis. No one has breached our clients."

"For future releases, integrating incident response tools and improving communication on incident reporting could be beneficial."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a good price, it's one of the cheaper solutions."

"ArcSight is pretty expensive compared with its competitors. I believe that is fine as it provides value."

"The pricing model is expensive compared to open-source alternatives."

"We're paying a fee for an MSSP, and the cost of the total cost of ArcSight ESM was approximately three to four million dollars a year. The price was less than similar solutions. We did not have additional fees."

"We have a license to use this solution. The price of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager is expensive."

"HPE ArcSight pricing might be more expensive than other SIEM solutions, but in my opinion it has powerful features and great flexibility in developing complex use cases."

"Thanks to Micro Focus's licensing model, as an MSSP, we are able to see a complete return on our investment almost immediately."

"Price-wise, ArcSight ESM was a bit high compared to competitors, which factored into our decision to switch to Splunk. It couldn't cover all our business needs for what we wanted to implement."

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager pricing and cost advice

"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."

"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."

"The price is quite reasonable."

"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."

"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."

"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at Deloitte & Touche

Jun 28, 2015

Qradar vs. ArcSight

Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	37
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	57

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?

In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

We utilize ArcSight ESM for real-time threat detection in our organization. We have custom rules that we've developed on top of the WAN services, along with scheduled licensing activities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?

ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is very cheap compared to other tools. It is worth the investment if you are considering the cost.

See all answers

What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.

See all answers

Comparisons

Trellix ESM vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 19% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 8% of the time

SurfWatch Labs SurfWatch vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Elastic Security vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Competitors

Wazuh vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 13% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 11% of the time

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 10% of the time

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager

October 2025

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager report

Download OpenText Enterprise Security Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

October 2025

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report

Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight

Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management

Overview

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager enables real-time threat detection through scalable and adaptable solutions, integrating seamlessly with multiple platforms for complex security scenarios across different environments.

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers extensive security monitoring capabilities, combining log analysis and incident management to enhance cybersecurity and compliance. Its powerful event correlation engine provides real-time alerts for rapid incident response. Users benefit from customizable dashboards and comprehensive log collection, making it a significant tool in the SIEM market. Flexible deployment options cater to both on-premises and cloud environments, supporting enterprises in managing IT infrastructure and threat detection efficiently.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?

Event Correlation Engine: Real-time threat detection with advanced correlation capabilities.
Scalability: Adapts to enterprise-level demands and complex security needs.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with multiple platforms and third-party tools.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailored views and active lists enhance user experience.
Advanced Alerting: Provides timely incident response and security alerts.

Why should users look for reviews when evaluating OpenText Enterprise Security Manager?

Timely Incident Responses: Fast alerting and action against threats.
User-Friendly Experience: Customizable dashboards simplify monitoring tasks.
Comprehensive Security Management: Integrated log management and threat detection across domains.
Adaptability and Scalability: Supports both on-premises and cloud deployments.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and energy, OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is implemented for monitoring critical systems and ensuring compliance with regulatory needs. Enterprises leverage its capabilities for forensic investigations and active threat management, serving as a central hub for cybersecurity operations across diverse IT infrastructures.

OpenText

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response.

With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructure, consolidating data from various sources for centralized monitoring and analysis.

Its threat intelligence feeds and behavioral analytics enable the identification of both known and unknown threats, ensuring comprehensive protection against advanced cyber attacks. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform empowers security teams with actionable insights, enabling them to prioritize and respond to threats swiftly. With its automated remediation capabilities, it minimizes the impact of attacks and reduces response time. The platform also offers customizable reporting and compliance management features, facilitating regulatory compliance and providing stakeholders with comprehensive security status updates.

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a robust and scalable solution that caters to the evolving cybersecurity needs of organizations across industries.

Seceon

Sample Customers

Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.

Caduceus, SUNY

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

September 2025

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.