Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs Red Canary comparison

Arctic Wolf Networks and Red Canary are both solutions in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category. Arctic Wolf Networks is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.8, while Red Canary is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.0. Additionally, 100% of Arctic Wolf Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Canary users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Red Canary and Arctic Wolf Managed Risk are competing products in managing cybersecurity threats. Red Canary has the upper hand in pricing and support satisfaction, while Arctic Wolf is superior in features, making it a worthy investment.

Features: Red Canary integrates well with EDR software like CrowdStrike and Carbon Black, offers helpful information, and provides near real-time alert reviews and actions. Arctic Wolf identifies vulnerabilities, conducts external scans with known hacks, and offers end-user awareness training, reinforcing security through active measures.

Room for Improvement: Red Canary could enhance automation beyond MITRE ATT&CK, diversify response playbooks, and improve comprehensive threat visibility. Arctic Wolf could offer solution guidance for issues, improve automated solutions beyond detection, and expand integration with existing security frameworks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Canary provides an intuitive deployment model with responsive support, emphasizing easy scalability. Arctic Wolf offers a methodical onboarding process supported by a detailed guidance team, ensuring thorough integration into security operations.

Pricing and ROI: Red Canary features competitive setup costs with a rapid ROI due to streamlined processes. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, though costlier, justifies its price with significant ROI from thorough risk management approaches, providing a valuable investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Red Canary Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Red Canary

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at Novartis

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Jared Kruger

Buisness Developer Manager / Sales Executive at Troye

Helps to conduct vulnerability scans but needs to add more integrations

There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an IT footprint carries risk from a cybersecurity perspective. These companies use tools but don't have the talent to leverage them.

Read full review

Sagar Shekhar

Cyber Security Analyst at TIAA

An open-source tool that offers great automation capabilities

Red Canary MDR generates a lot of output, so it would be good if, in the end, it generates a summary of all the previous attacks and what was the outcome of a single attack, especially so that it becomes easy for the user to see the summary and analyze the whole thing. In general, the solution currently fails to provide a summary to its users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"The most valuable feature of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is being informed about what vulnerabilities there are exposed currently."

"We have a patch management solution that scans for any patches that can be applied and then applies these patches, but it doesn't hit everything. It also doesn't find all misconfigurations and things like that. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk kind of fills in the gaps and makes us aware of vulnerabilities or misconfigurations that exist out there. It does an agent scan for software versions and compares them to what CVs are out there and lets us know."

"The customer support is incredible."

"We get access to quarterly reviews with their team."

"The reporting is really good from what I've seen so far."

"This solution has made huge strides in improving the awareness of our end users."

"I appreciate the professionalism of the tool and have faith in the results it delivers."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk pros

"The solution works well for what we use it for and the support and protection are good."

"The near real-time review translates into near real-time action. So, in addition to alerting, Red Canary MDR has response playbooks built out."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its automation part."

"The valuable features of this solution are it integrates well with different EDR software, such CrowdStrike, and Carbon Black, and the information it provides is helpful."

Cons

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"It could be easier to use. They could present things in a little bit more ranked order rather than kind of giving you everything out there. It should highlight the really important stuff and make it easier to get to good rather than perfect."

"The presentation of the data could be improved. I believe they have significant room for improvement, particularly in making better analysis of the vulnerability data and presenting those data more effectively."

"The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected."

"The scalability could improve."

"The best way to take this product to the next level would be to implement a patch management solution."

"The presentation of the data could be improved."

"The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected."

"Arctic Wolf Managed Risk needs to add more integrations."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk cons

"The most valuable feature of Red Canary MDR is the overall threat protection it provides."

"The price could always be better."

"In general, the solution currently fails to provide a summary to its users."

"I would like there to be an on-premise version of this solution for our data centers because of the proliferation of online threats."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonable compared to the competition."

"It depends on the company size quite a bit."

"Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonably priced and I rate it a four out of ten."

"Red Canary MDR I use is an open-source tool."

"I have not compared Red Canary to other solutions to know if the price is high or low. However, I have found the price of this solution fair and reasonable, it cost approximately $100 per year, per device. If they could provide the solution for $50 per year, per device, it would be better."

"The solution could vary in price depending on how many endpoints a company has."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

Retailer

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Pricing for Zafran Security is not expensive. We have a contract for five years, and the cost is lower than other too...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

I would like to see an integration with Check Point firewalls. It's essential for us and they are currently working o...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

We use Zafran Security for threat prioritization. We establish priority to understand which risks should be patched o...

See all answers

What do you like most about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

The pricing is fair, and I find it reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

The presentation of the data could be improved. I believe they have significant room for improvement, particularly in...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Canary MDR?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its automation part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Canary MDR?

Red Canary MDR I use is an open-source tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Canary MDR?

Red Canary MDR generates a lot of output, so it would be good if, in the end, it generates a summary of all the previ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dazz.io vs Zafran Security

Compared 52% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 21% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 19% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 8% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 18% of the time

Adlumin Cybersecurity vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 18% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 13% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 12% of the time

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Competitors

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Red Canary

Compared 21% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Red Canary

Compared 20% of the time

Expel vs Red Canary

Compared 13% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Red Canary

Compared 8% of the time

Blackpoint Cyber MDR vs Red Canary

Compared 2% of the time

More Red Canary Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

March 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

March 2025

Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk product report

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

March 2025

Download Red Canary product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Delivered by security experts - Concierge Security® Team; the Arctic Wolf® Managed Risk solution enables you to define and contextualize your attack surface coverage across your networks, endpoints, and cloud environments; provides you with the risk priorities in your environment; and advises you on your remediation actions to ensure that you are benchmarking against configuration best practices and continually hardening your security posture.

Arctic Wolf Networks

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR) offers robust threat detection, rapid response capabilities, continuous security monitoring, and seamless integration with existing tools. Valued for its actionable reporting and proactive threat intelligence, it streamlines operations and enhances organizational efficiency and security.

Red Canary

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Zelle LLP, DNI Corp, Roper Pump, Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice

DuPont, Quanta Services, Microchip Technology, Hopkins Public Schools, Henny Penny, Schumacher Homes

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Red Canary

March 2025

Free Report: Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Red Canary

Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Red Canary and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Red Canary report.

See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.