Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo

Top 10 Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Alternatives

Vendor: Arctic Wolf Networks
4.4 out of 5
Post review

Top Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Arctic Wolf Managed Risk based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, and Qualys VMDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk surpasses its competitors by offering real-time risk identification, comprehensive threat monitoring, and customized risk management strategies, ensuring optimal cybersecurity defense through unparalleled expertise and proactive measures that adapt to evolving security challenges.

Arctic Wolf Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Arctic Wolf Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk excels through cost-effective pricing and superior support. In comparison, Wiz impresses with exceptional cloud visibility features. Tech buyers might choose Arctic Wolf for cost management and support, while Wiz appeals to those seeking comprehensive cloud security capabilities.
Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Wiz Report
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Wiz requires a more complex setup process that might incur higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Wiz requires a more complex setup process that might incur higher expenses.
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers seamless Azure integration and favorable pricing. In comparison, Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is appealing for its tailored threat detection and dedicated security teams. Microsoft emphasizes automation, while Arctic Wolf focuses on personalized service, catering to different organizational needs.
Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers lower setup costs compared to Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, highlighting a significant pricing difference between these security solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers lower setup costs compared to Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, highlighting a significant pricing difference between these security solutions.
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.1 out of 5
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in comprehensive vulnerability management and customer support. In comparison, Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers superior deployment flexibility and proactive threat detection. Tech buyers may choose Qualys VMDR for pricing advantages, while Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is preferred for managed detection and response capabilities.
Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR reports a higher setup cost compared to Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, making it less favorable for budget-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR reports a higher setup cost compared to Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, making it less favorable for budget-conscious businesses.
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Tenable Nessus offers affordable and effective vulnerability assessments with straightforward deployment. In comparison, Arctic Wolf Managed Risk provides comprehensive risk management with cloud deployment, prioritizing long-term security value. Tenable Nessus appeals for simplicity and cost, while Arctic Wolf targets broader security needs.
Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Nessus Report
Tenable Nessus offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Arctic Wolf Managed Risk may involve a more complex setup with potentially higher initial expenses. Consider the distinct setup requirements when evaluating these cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Nessus offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Arctic Wolf Managed Risk may involve a more complex setup with potentially higher initial expenses. Consider the distinct setup requirements when evaluating these cybersecurity solutions.
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management
4.1 out of 5
Tenable Vulnerability Management is favored for vulnerability scanning and reporting, providing security insights. In comparison, Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers a holistic approach with threat detection and response, making it ideal for comprehensive managed solutions. Tenable suits budget-conscious buyers, while Arctic Wolf provides substantial long-term value.
Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report
Tenable Vulnerability Management has higher setup costs, while Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Vulnerability Management has higher setup costs, while Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP leads with dynamic scalability and robust cloud-native protection, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking flexibility. In comparison, Arctic Wolf Managed Risk excels in threat detection and proactive management, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive service and higher ROI.
Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Report
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP has a high setup cost compared to Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, which is known for its more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP has a high setup cost compared to Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, which is known for its more budget-friendly initial investment.
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit
3.8 out of 5
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit
3.8 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit excels in comprehensive penetration testing features and affordability. In comparison, Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers extensive threat intelligence and continuous monitoring, appealing to organizations seeking a broader security solution. Metasploit's cost-effectiveness contrasts with Arctic Wolf's strategic and managed service approach.
Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit has a significantly lower setup cost than Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, highlighting a key financial difference between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit has a significantly lower setup cost than Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, highlighting a key financial difference between the two cybersecurity solutions.
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Logo
Barracuda Vulnerabitlity Manager
4.5 out of 5

Identify and fix website vulnerabilities—before hackers exploit them.
Vulnerabilities in your websites and other public-facing applications can lead to costly data breaches that disrupt your business operations and erode customer trust. There are hundreds of ways to bring down a website, hack into your data, and introduce malware into your network. In fact, more than 80 percent of websites have vulnerabilities that put businesses and data at risk.

The product is free.
View comparison
Pricing
The product is free.

Related categories

Vulnerability Management
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Container Security