Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Arctic Wolf Networks and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Arctic Wolf Networks is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.8, while Tenable is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8. Arctic Wolf Networks holds a 0.9% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arctic Wolf Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Tenable Vulnerability Management and Arctic Wolf Managed Risk compete in cybersecurity vulnerability management. Arctic Wolf appears to have the upper hand with its comprehensive threat monitoring features and high ROI, making it a valued investment despite a higher initial cost.

Features: Tenable offers detailed network scanning, integration with various systems, and robust security insights. Arctic Wolf provides continuous threat monitoring, proactive risk management, and comprehensive threat detection tools.

Room for Improvement: Tenable could improve its user interface, enhance automation capabilities, and expand reporting options. Arctic Wolf might benefit from enhanced customization, increased integration with third-party systems, and reduced service response time in some regions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable supports streamlined deployment with responsive customer service, effectively integrating with existing infrastructures. Arctic Wolf is noted for its straightforward setup and exceptional service support, ensuring a smooth implementation experience.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable offers competitive pricing, focusing on balancing cost with investment benefits, and is noted for cost-effective ROI. Arctic Wolf, with a higher initial cost, demonstrates significant ROI through enhanced security capabilities and supports a strong pricing structure.

To learn more, read our detailed Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,344 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualys TotalCloud

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Qualys TotalCloud is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 2.7%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tenable Vulnerability Management	2.7%
Qualys TotalCloud	1.2%
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk	0.9%
Other	95.2%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Robert Orłowski

IT Security Expert at Alior Bank S.A.

Unified risk scoring has improved our cloud visibility and simplifies remediation priorities

Qualys TotalCloud provides unified vulnerability and threat assessment across both IAS and SaaS. This solution provides a single prioritized view of risk, which helps reduce the work I would have to do. We are no longer based on CVSS; we are based on Qualys risk scoring, which is based on CVSS plus internal findings made by Qualys, and then assigns its own score. The TruRisk insight feature has found a small number of assets with high vulnerability scores, though I am cautious since some information is classified. Qualys TotalCloud has positively impacted our bank's performance, and we have definitely seen benefits after implementing this solution.

Read full review

Chu Kong

Director, Information Technology at a performing arts with 201-500 employees

Proactive alert management enhances network security and provides peace of mind

The reporting is really good from what I've seen so far. They are on top of the alerts, especially the critical ones. This proactive approach to alert management ensures that if someone downloads something on a workstation that shouldn't be downloaded, they address it quickly. Their ability to identify and provide information on critical alerts is very valuable.

Read full review

Chethan Gowda

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Have maintained accurate vulnerability scans and gained actionable remediation insights across thousands of servers

Tenable Vulnerability Management agents are very lightweight, and the results we get are very accurate. The solutions they provide to us, assuming if one vulnerability exists, there will be a solution. The resolution they give us in wording will be the best solution. The exploit rates and the reports we get provide a lot of information, making it very easy for us to verify.The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment. That is one of the key aspects of why we have integrated Tenable to our patching tools. It has a vast capacity of pushing the data to our tools due to its capability and compatibility. That is also one of the reasons why we are using Tenable Vulnerability Management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CSPM is currently the most used feature, and we are enjoying the new feature, FlexScan, which is valuable for Internet-facing VMs."

"TruRisk Insights is the most important innovation they've released this year."

"Qualys TotalCloud has helped us view our risk structure, vulnerabilities, and security posture."

"The most valuable feature of Qualys TotalCloud is the visibility it provides."

"The dashboards are particularly valuable as they offer a comprehensive view of the environment, highlighting any misconfigurations."

"The agent and agentless scanning in TotalCloud, particularly the FlexScan method, is incredibly valuable. With traditional scanning approaches, we had to give IP ranges and whitelist IPs. All that is now simplified. FlexScan requires minimal intervention, and after configuration, it automatically collects data and performs necessary scans."

"If I had to say something positive about the product that brings me the biggest benefit, I would say it has accurate reports, gets new update CVEs, zero-day attack detection, and is easy to manage with its GUI."

"Qualys TotalCloud's most valuable features are its cloud security posture management, Kubernetes, and container security capabilities."

More Qualys TotalCloud pros

"There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an IT footprint carries risk from a cybersecurity perspective. These companies use tools but don't have the talent to leverage them."

"The customer support is incredible."

"The user-friendly interface and customizable reporting have helped our IT team interpret and act on the platform's insights."

"I appreciate the professionalism of the tool and have faith in the results it delivers."

"The user-friendly interface and customizable reporting helped our IT team interpret and act on the platform's insights because they did not have any problems using it."

"We have a patch management solution that scans for any patches that can be applied and then applies these patches, but it doesn't hit everything. It also doesn't find all misconfigurations and things like that. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk kind of fills in the gaps and makes us aware of vulnerabilities or misconfigurations that exist out there. It does an agent scan for software versions and compares them to what CVs are out there and lets us know."

"The reporting is really good from what I've seen so far."

"We get access to quarterly reviews with their team."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk pros

"The dashboard is pretty intuitive, and it lets you do a drill-down analysis of each vulnerability. That is something that brings a lot of value to the organization."

"Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting."

"The interface is fine."

"The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place."

"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."

"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable, and it has a diverse checklist when it comes to vulnerability databases."

"The best feature of the solution is the amount of visibility it provides of the vulnerabilities."

"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"The patching process with Qualys Patch Management, which is part of TotalCloud, does not cover installing certain prerequisites on the servers or workstations. This shortcoming means we must rely on SCCM when any service stack updates or additional prerequisites are needed."

"I sometimes have difficulty detecting or uninstalling certain versions of applications, which I have to do manually."

"The response part of the Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) module can be improved."

"An area for improvement would be to focus on risks related to AI, such as large language models and potential data leakage."

"In my opinion, what can be improved in Qualys TotalCloud includes pricing and container scanning."

"The support process is inefficient due to the excessive number of replies required when submitting tickets."

"Areas that need improvement in every solution include the remediation part. The remediation steps should be simple enough for everyone to understand."

"There should be improvement from a dashboard perspective when collecting and showcasing data to lead management."

More Qualys TotalCloud cons

"The presentation of the data could be improved. I believe they have significant room for improvement, particularly in making better analysis of the vulnerability data and presenting those data more effectively."

"It could be easier to use. They could present things in a little bit more ranked order rather than kind of giving you everything out there. It should highlight the really important stuff and make it easier to get to good rather than perfect."

"The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected."

"The best way to take this product to the next level would be to implement a patch management solution."

"Arctic Wolf Managed Risk needs to add more integrations."

"There are some challenges with integrations in Arctic Wolf Managed Risk. Some integrations could be improved to enhance functionality."

"The presentation of the data could be improved."

"The scalability could improve."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk cons

"t needs additional reporting and intelligence features, as well as enhancements in AI-driven detection, which is still in its early stages."

"The response times from the customer service and support team could be improved."

"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."

"The price could be lower, and the grouping of platforms on the dashboard can be included in the next release of the product."

"The UI has room for improvement."

"An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard."

"It can have more integration."

"The only drawback of the solution is that it is expensive."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While Qualys TotalCloud's pricing is currently acceptable, it is becoming increasingly expensive and may soon be considered overpriced."

"Qualys TotalCloud is expensive."

"The pricing is comparable. It is built into our other product, so I cannot piecemeal it. It is a part of our subscription."

"The cost is high, but it meets our organizational needs."

"TotalCloud's price is about right where I would expect it to be."

"I am not sure about the pricing. From what I understand, it is a bit on the higher side, but I do not have the exact numbers."

"Qualys TotalCloud offers good pricing that is affordable and competitive with the market. Our partnership also provides us with additional benefits."

"Qualys TotalCloud is cost-efficient and was selected for its value compared to other products."

More Qualys TotalCloud pricing and cost advice

"Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonably priced and I rate it a four out of ten."

"It depends on the company size quite a bit."

"The price of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonable compared to the competition."

"A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."

"Tenable charges around $40 per device."

"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."

"The solution is not too expensive."

"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,344 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys TotalCloud?

The price is very expensive, actually.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys TotalCloud?

Areas that need improvement in every solution include the remediation part. The remediation steps should be simple en...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys TotalCloud?

Our use case involves the assets that we have under cloud, the assets exposed to the internet, and the internal appli...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

The pricing is fair, and I find it reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

There are some challenges with integrations in Arctic Wolf Managed Risk. Some integrations could be improved to enhan...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

We will proceed with publishing the review on the platform, making it available to other users. The link will be prov...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

In my opinion, I would like to see additional functions and improvements. Something related to AI would be a good add...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I have purchased a license directly from Tenable, so I am working directly with Tenable and not through partners. My ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 8% of the time

JupiterOne vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 7% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Security Hub vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Qualys TotalCloud Competitors

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 13% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Cloud Apps Protection vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 10% of the time

Adlumin Security Operations vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 6% of the time

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Competitors

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 3% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qualys TotalCloud

July 2026

Download Qualys TotalCloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

July 2026

Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

July 2026

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

Qualys TotalCloud with FlexScan

No data available

Tenable.io

Overview

Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.

Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.

What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?

Accurate Vulnerability Reports: Delivers precise and actionable insights for risk mitigation.
Zero-Day Detection: Identifies and addresses zero-day vulnerabilities proactively.
Unified Threat Assessment: Offers comprehensive evaluation of threats across the environment.
Extensive Risk Management: Manages risks effectively with advanced insights and prioritization.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides non-stop surveillance for vulnerabilities and threats.
Cloud-Native Automation: Streamlines processes and reduces manual efforts using automation.
FlexScan for Internet-Facing VMs: Scans external VMs efficiently to detect vulnerabilities.
Dashboard Risk Visualization: Clear visualization helps prioritize vulnerabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances threat detection and response across clouds.
Time Savings: Automation reduces time spent on manual vulnerability management.
Resource Efficiency: Better allocation of resources through streamlined workflows.
Enhanced Risk Prioritization: Focus on critical vulnerabilities for effective mitigation.
Integrated Cloud Accounts: Facilitates seamless cloud management and security.

Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.

Qualys

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk enhances cybersecurity through comprehensive vulnerability detection, proactive communication, and detailed reporting, aiding organizations in threat identification and incident response programs.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk provides visibility into cybersecurity vulnerabilities, helping organizations protect IT assets by identifying threats and conducting external network scans. It emphasizes user-friendly interfaces and customizable reporting to assist IT teams in mitigating risks. Critical alert management and end-user awareness training bolster threat identification, while professional risk insights contribute to meeting security objectives. Although integrations require improvement, Arctic Wolf Managed Risk remains vital in proactive risk management.

What features does Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offer?

End-User Awareness: Educates users on cybersecurity threats to improve security practices.
Security Ratings: Assesses the organization's security posture for informed decision-making.
Critical Alert Management: Alerts teams to high-priority threats for immediate action.
Proactive Communication: Enhances threat identification with timely communication.
Customizable Reporting: Tailors reports for better risk analysis and presentation.
Vulnerability Scanning: Conducts thorough agent and brute force external scans to find vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect?

Comprehensive Risk Insights: Provides detailed analyses to fortify security strategies.
Professionalism: Ensures a high level of service and reliability in risk management.
Improved Threat Mitigation: Aids in reducing vulnerabilities and enhancing security protocols.

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is effectively applied in enterprise environments to ensure IT asset security and bolster incident response initiatives. By assessing potential security risks and offering real-time insights, it supports industries in managing comprehensive security strategies for business continuity and protection against cyber threats.

Arctic Wolf Networks

Tenable Vulnerability Management offers efficient scanning, reporting, and integration capabilities. It supports extensive visibility and risk management for diverse environments while providing a user-friendly experience with strong cloud capabilities and container scanning.

Tenable Vulnerability Management is crucial for vulnerability assessment and managing security across network infrastructures. It effectively handles cloud and on-premises scans, identifying risks and enhancing cybersecurity measures with detailed reports. With features like automated scanning and risk prioritization, users manage vulnerabilities efficiently. Despite its strong points, improvements in pricing, navigation, and customization are desired, alongside better integration and AI-driven detection.

What are the most important features of Tenable Vulnerability Management?

Automated Scanning: Simplifies the identification of vulnerabilities through efficient scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights into potential security risks.
Seamless Integration: Easily connects with third-party tools for extended functionality.
Cloud Capabilities: Provides strong security management in cloud environments.
Container Scanning: Specialized in scanning containerized applications for threats.
Real-time Prioritization: Helps prioritize vulnerabilities for effective resolution.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security Posture: Achieves improved overall protection from threats.
Efficient Risk Management: Streamlines the process of identifying and mitigating risks.
Extensive Visibility: Offers a clear understanding of assets and vulnerabilities across the network.
Scalability: Adapts to varying organizational sizes and needs effectively.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and education, Tenable Vulnerability Management supports robust cybersecurity measures. Organizations utilize it for scanning IT infrastructures, conducting cloud assessments, and performing endpoint analysis to mitigate threats in critical environments.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Zelle LLP, DNI Corp, Roper Pump, Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

June 2026

Free Report: Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,344 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.