Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.1
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk can improve by prioritizing issues realistically, enhancing scanning, and adding patch management and scalability features.
Sentiment score
4.3
Tenable Vulnerability Management needs interface improvements, better reporting, clearer licensing, and enhanced user-friendly features for small businesses.
The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk pricing is competitive, cost-effective, and accommodates organizational size with positive user feedback despite variability.
Sentiment score
5.5
Tenable Vulnerability Management is considered expensive with asset-based pricing, prompting users to seek cost-effective, flexible payment options.
I believe you pay a premium for a SOC.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
6.8
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk enhances cybersecurity by identifying vulnerabilities, providing detailed assessments, and supporting with alerts and industry ratings.
Sentiment score
8.1
Tenable excels in vulnerability management with a user-friendly interface, robust scanning, seamless integration, and comprehensive risk prioritization.
This proactive approach to alert management ensures that if someone downloads something on a workstation that shouldn't be downloaded, they address it quickly.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.9
Tenable's support is responsive but costly, with mixed reviews on response times, effectiveness, and documentation access issues noted.
Their technicians and engineers are really knowledgeable and professional.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.3
Tenable Vulnerability Management is highly scalable and widely used, especially in finance and public sectors, with flexible cloud-based solutions.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.1
Tenable Vulnerability Management is reliable and stable, highly rated by users despite occasional minor network-related issues.
 

Categories and Ranking

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
27th
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
10th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tenable Vulnerability Manag...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
5th
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 9.0%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Jared Kruger - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to conduct vulnerability scans but needs to add more integrations
There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an IT footprint carries risk from a cybersecurity perspective. These companies use tools but don't have the talent to leverage them.
Yogeswaran Neelagandan - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers risk prioritization , notification system but support should be bundled with the product cost
It's a fantastic product, but there are some things to consider. One is the price. Compared to on-prem solutions, the SaaS model can be expensive. Price is definitely a concern and needs improvement, especially for the Indian market. While it's a fantastic product, it should be more accessible to small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs). Currently, only larger enterprises seem to be able to afford and evaluate it thoroughly. So, pricing can be improved and be more affordable for the Indian market, specifically for SMBs. Another area of improvement is customer service and support. Tenable needs to include support in the pricing/license. Currently, they push clients to get support from partners or channel distributors, who often charge a lot. Even for a simple one-time setup, they may charge three to four lakhs, and then additional annual charges for ongoing support. We have the technical skills to handle basic tasks, but relying on Tenable itself often results in just receiving emails or being redirected back to channel partners. So, support should be bundled with the product cost.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
Educational Organization
30%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?
There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonably priced and I rate it a four out of ten.
What needs improvement with Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk needs to add more integrations.
What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...
What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
It needs additional reporting and intelligence features, as well as enhancements in AI-driven detection, which is still in its early stages.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tenable.io
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Zelle LLP, DNI Corp, Roper Pump, Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice
Global Payments AU/NZ
Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.