Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

Arctic Wolf Networks and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Arctic Wolf Networks is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.8, while Rapid7 is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.2. Additionally, 100% of Arctic Wolf Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Rapid7 Metasploit and Arctic Wolf Managed Risk compete in the cybersecurity sector. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk appears to have the upper hand with enriched features offering better overall value.

Features: Rapid7 Metasploit provides exploit development, penetration testing, and intuitive deployment. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers comprehensive threat management, proactive vulnerability mitigation, and robust risk anticipation and response capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Rapid7 Metasploit could enhance its support for broader threat management, increase features for vulnerability response, and improve its long-term risk anticipation. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk could reduce its initial investment, streamline deployment for ease, and better tailor solutions for all business sizes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 Metasploit features a straightforward deployment process. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk offers extensive customer support during deployment, providing tailored solutions and guidance for integration into existing systems.

Pricing and ROI: Rapid7 Metasploit has an affordable setup cost, often ensuring a swift return on investment through efficient testing abilities. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, with a potentially higher initial cost, offers comprehensive risk management services aimed at enhancing long-term security, making it a viable option for sustained ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at Novartis

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Jared Kruger

Buisness Developer Manager / Sales Executive at Troye

Helps to conduct vulnerability scans but needs to add more integrations

There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an IT footprint carries risk from a cybersecurity perspective. These companies use tools but don't have the talent to leverage them.

Read full review

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Comprehensive insights with robust vulnerability detection and streamlined alert management

Rapid7 has a significant advantage in providing a clear picture of my environment. It provides insight and incident detection response capabilities. When deployed with the same agent in servers or endpoints, it identifies vulnerabilities and monitors data transmission to external sources. Rapid7 offers comprehensive features within one platform, eliminating the need to integrate multiple tools to see all alerts in one place.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an IT footprint carries risk from a cybersecurity perspective. These companies use tools but don't have the talent to leverage them."

"The customer support is incredible."

"We get access to quarterly reviews with their team."

"We have a patch management solution that scans for any patches that can be applied and then applies these patches, but it doesn't hit everything. It also doesn't find all misconfigurations and things like that. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk kind of fills in the gaps and makes us aware of vulnerabilities or misconfigurations that exist out there. It does an agent scan for software versions and compares them to what CVs are out there and lets us know."

"The reporting is really good from what I've seen so far."

"I appreciate the professionalism of the tool and have faith in the results it delivers."

"This solution has made huge strides in improving the awareness of our end users."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk pros

"Rapid7 Metasploit is a useful product."

"It's not possible to do penetration testing without being very proficient in Metasploit."

"The tool's most useful feature for penetration testing is its automation capabilities. With the professional edition, you can upload the results from Nessus in the Rapid7 Metasploit solution portal."

"Technical support has been helpful and responsive."

"Rapid7 offers comprehensive features within one platform, eliminating the need to integrate multiple tools to see all alerts in one place."

"Rapid7 has a significant advantage in providing a clear picture of my environment."

"The solution is open source and has many small targetted penetration tests that have been written by many people that are useful. You can choose different subjects for the test, such as Oracle databases or Apache servers."

"When I compare Metasploit with Nessus, I find that Metasploit is faster and it does not burden the system as much."

More Rapid7 Metasploit pros

Cons

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"The scalability could improve."

"The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected."

"It could be easier to use. They could present things in a little bit more ranked order rather than kind of giving you everything out there. It should highlight the really important stuff and make it easier to get to good rather than perfect."

"Arctic Wolf Managed Risk needs to add more integrations."

"The best way to take this product to the next level would be to implement a patch management solution."

"The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected."

"The presentation of the data could be improved."

"The presentation of the data could be improved. I believe they have significant room for improvement, particularly in making better analysis of the vulnerability data and presenting those data more effectively."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk cons

"The solution is not user-friendly and has room for improvement."

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

"It is necessary to add some training materials and a tutorial for beginners."

"The database is not always updated with the latest vulnerabilities or zero-day exploits. If a vulnerability arises a month or two ago, it might not be included in the database, which is something I would like to see improved."

"The open-source version has reporting limitations. You need to develop these capabilities yourself. Built-in reporting is an excellent feature for penetration testing, but it isn't a must-have. The solution could also cover more vulnerabilities. Metasploit has around 10,000 exploits in its library, but more is always better."

"Rapid7 Metasploit can add a GUI feature because it is only available online."

"If your company's patch is not up to date, but you have other detection or defense solutions such as endpoint detection and response and antivirus software, the product exploit may not work effectively. This is because its exploit database update process is slow and not real-time. For zero-day vulnerabilities or new security threats, relying on Rapid7 Metasploit alone may not be effective."

"Rapid7 Metasploit could be made easier for new users to learn."

More Rapid7 Metasploit cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonably priced and I rate it a four out of ten."

"The price of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonable compared to the competition."

"It depends on the company size quite a bit."

"The pricing structure involves a one-time purchase cost of approximately twenty thousand dollars or euros for all customers."

"The cost is approximately $15 per device."

"The great advantage with Rapid7 Metasploit, of course, is that it's free."

"Rapid7 Metasploit is cheaper than Tenable.io Vulnerability Management."

"Rapid7 Metasploit is an open-source solution."

"We pay monthly. The pricing is reasonable."

"I use the open-source version of this product. Pricing is not relevant."

"I have used the free version of Rapid7 Metasploit."

More Rapid7 Metasploit pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

Retailer

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Pricing for Zafran Security is not expensive. We have a contract for five years, and the cost is lower than other too...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

I would like to see an integration with Check Point firewalls. It's essential for us and they are currently working o...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

We use Zafran Security for threat prioritization. We establish priority to understand which risks should be patched o...

See all answers

What do you like most about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

The pricing is fair, and I find it reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

The presentation of the data could be improved. I believe they have significant room for improvement, particularly in...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 Metasploit?

I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 Metasploit?

Metasploit is cheaper than Nessus and offers a more robust community edition that provides a good experience for stud...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 Metasploit?

While Metasploit excels in vulnerability assessment, it could improve in vulnerability management. Nessus currently h...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dazz.io vs Zafran Security

Compared 52% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 21% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 19% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 8% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 18% of the time

Adlumin Cybersecurity vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 18% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 13% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 12% of the time

Wiz vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 10% of the time

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 21% of the time

Pentera vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 12% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 8% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 6% of the time

More Rapid7 Metasploit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

March 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

March 2025

Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 Metasploit

March 2025

Download Rapid7 Metasploit product report

Also Known As

No data available

Metasploit

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Delivered by security experts - Concierge Security® Team; the Arctic Wolf® Managed Risk solution enables you to define and contextualize your attack surface coverage across your networks, endpoints, and cloud environments; provides you with the risk priorities in your environment; and advises you on your remediation actions to ensure that you are benchmarking against configuration best practices and continually hardening your security posture.

Arctic Wolf Networks

Attackers are always developing new exploits and attack methods—Metasploit penetration testing software helps you use their own weapons against them. Utilizing an ever-growing database of exploits, you can safely simulate real-world attacks on your network to train your security team to spot and stop the real thing.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Zelle LLP, DNI Corp, Roper Pump, Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice

City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

March 2025

Free Report: Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Rapid7 Metasploit and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Rapid7 Metasploit report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.