Arista Campus LAN Switches vs Cisco FabricPath comparison

Arista and Cisco are both solutions in the LAN Switching category. Arista is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while Cisco is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Arista holds a 4.4% mindshare in LS, compared to Cisco’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

Arista Campus LAN Switches

Read 8 Arista Campus LAN Switches reviews

395 Views
395 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco FabricPath

Read 31 Cisco FabricPath reviews

571 Views
560 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Arista Campus LAN Switches

Cisco FabricPath

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Arista Campus LAN Switches and Cisco FabricPath compete in the networking equipment market, aiming to enhance network efficiency with distinct advantages. Cisco FabricPath offers advanced features that may justify its higher cost, but Arista's appealing pricing and customer service make it a strong contender.

Features: Arista Campus LAN Switches are appreciated for their streamlined architecture, high availability, and scalability. Cisco FabricPath is recognized for its robust feature set that enhances performance and reliability in complex environments. Cisco delivers a comprehensive solution for intricate networks, while Arista focuses on simplicity for growing networks.

Room for Improvement: Arista could expand on advanced security features, integrate more cloud-based management options, and offer enhanced QoS controls. Cisco FabricPath may improve on reducing complexity for smaller deployments, offer more affordable configuration options, and enhance interoperability with non-Cisco devices.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco FabricPath provides a well-structured deployment model with extensive documentation, beneficial for large networks with complex needs. Arista Campus LAN Switches offer straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, ensuring immediate assistance and simpler integration across various network sizes.

Pricing and ROI: Arista provides budget-friendly setup costs, offering significant ROI with scalable solutions. Cisco FabricPath's setup costs are higher, justified by its feature-rich offerings, especially for networks requiring advanced functionalities. Arista is cost-efficient, while Cisco reflects its value through extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Cisco FabricPath Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Cisco FabricPath

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arista Campus LAN Switches

Ranking in LAN Switching

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco FabricPath

Ranking in LAN Switching

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the LAN Switching category, the mindshare of Arista Campus LAN Switches is 4.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco FabricPath is 3.2%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

LAN Switching Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco FabricPath	3.2%
Arista Campus LAN Switches	4.4%
Other	92.4%

LAN Switching

Featured Reviews

Denis Malinovtsev

Chief Technology Officer at ictbit

Unified monitoring has transformed campus deployments and provides rapid EVPN-VXLAN rollouts

Regarding improvements to Arista Campus LAN Switches, nothing comes to mind about the switches themselves; they are really fast and have all the technologies and protocols that exist in the market. However, on the management system, I would improve it because as a network engineer, I want a chatbot that can communicate in a native language with the monitoring system to get answers regarding my network faults. There are no problems particularly with the product, but there is room for improvement regarding licensing and the chatbot for all Arista products.

Read full review

AmrFouad

Technical Project Manager at Cairo International Airport Co.

Offers seamless integration and boosts operational efficiency with minimum downtimes

I find stability to be the most effective feature of Cisco FabricPath; it is stable. Cisco FabricPath has good scalability; I don't have any problems with scalability as I can add any switches or distributors without any problem. I utilize the multipath routing architecture feature in Cisco FabricPath, and it's good in load balancing. Cisco FabricPath's compatibility to support Dynamic Layer 2 multipath routing in complex virtualized environments is good; I don't have any problems with it. Nothing comes to mind regarding metrics for using the Layer 2 multipath routing feature; it was good, and there were no problems at all with Cisco FabricPath. Cisco FabricPath's integration with Cisco Nexus works with virtual port channel (VPC) and is good for dual home servers and edge switches. We are using VPC in every layer of the Nexus center. Implementing Cisco FabricPath positively impacted my organization by providing minimum downtimes as the service is always up; everything is working properly with the VPC and Cisco FabricPath. I have experienced operational efficiencies with Cisco FabricPath that are 200% better than the old legacy equipment and protocols.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The CloudVision Portal allows us to centrally manage all of our Arista products."

"QoS is the most valuable feature because our clients work with VOIP and Critical applications."

"The feature sets are pretty cool. They've got almost everything that the competition offers."

"The technology is scalable as much as you want."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its stability because Arista falls in an industry that is very similar to Cisco."

"I use the solution for connectivity in data centers and LANs, providing Layer 2 and Layer 3 connectivity based on network needs."

"The most winning feature of Arista Campus LAN Switches is their management, specifically CloudVision, along with features like comparing changes and diagnosing problems quickly with telemetry and network visualization."

"The most valuable features are the security, web control, and traffic control."

"Cisco FabricPath operates with minimal errors."

"It's very stable."

"I like the 10G ports and the modular uplink port."

"The fact that the solution is on the cloud is its most valuable aspect. If you are on the cloud, you can manage your network from anywhere, any place. It's very good."

"The most beneficial feature of Cisco FabricPath for network performance is its reliability."

"Additional bandwidth is available when needed."

"Cisco FabricPath is highly beneficial for network performance and relatively easy to implement. It also offers straightforward monitoring capabilities."

More Cisco FabricPath pros

Cons

"I think there's still room for improvement. Arista Campus LAN Switches are not highly scalable as they are hardware-based. If hardware requirements exceed capacity, the product needs to be changed, which can impact service."

"One of the issues that we have been faced with here in Brazil is that we don't have any list times for delivery."

"I would like to see a version available with eight or sixteen ports."

"It would be ideal if the solution was less expensive."

"I do think they could improve their licensing model. Today, I need to pay for a license, for a switch, for support, and it costs money; it is not cheap."

"The complex setup phase is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"We have to renew the license every three years, which can be a challenge for customers. Arista, like other vendors, now follows a license-based system."

"The management features are in need of improvement."

"Currently, there are no issues or suggestions for improvement as everything is working smoothly."

"They should consider upgrading the memory feature of the product."

"The product lacks AI...The initial setup of Cisco FabricPath was a bit complex."

"The prices for FabricPath are very high, and Cisco also takes a long time to deliver products (in Mexico, the delivery time is eight months)."

"In Southeast Asian countries like Indonesia and Malaysia, and in the Latin America region, delivery times can be quite lengthy. This is challenging in terms of logistics and customs."

"The documents could improve for Cisco FabricPath. There are times when the relevant information is not present in the different sections of the documents, such as deployment. The documents should be more detailed and enhanced."

"The solution should offer better reporting."

More Cisco FabricPath cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The only licensing costs are for CloudVision, although the upfront price of the device is not cheap."

"The price is not that good, but our clients value the solution despite the price."

"I rate it seven out of ten on pricing as it's a bit expensive. It would be better if the price were lower, but we prioritize quality over cost."

"Cisco is expensive but offers good-quality features, so I would rate it high on the pricing scale."

"FabricPath is very reasonably priced."

"It is very expensive."

"The price of Cisco FabricPath could be reduced, it is expensive in the market here in Sri Lanka. The solution is subscriptions based, if the customer wants any future integrations, or if there are any future enhancements they will have to pay. There are different license options available, such as one or three years purchases."

"The pricing of Cisco FabricPath can be quite high depending on the architecture, but it's justified by the stability it offers."

"The solution falls under the pricier category, but it provides value for the price charged."

"The pricing for this product is good."

More Cisco FabricPath pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

University

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arista Campus LAN Switches?

I have cross-checked because this network is a ten-gig network. We are using the multigig switches, which Cisco also has. We found that Cisco's cost is 100%, while the cost of the multi-gig switche...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arista Campus LAN Switches?

I think there's still room for improvement. Arista Campus LAN Switches are not highly scalable as they are hardware-based. If hardware requirements exceed capacity, the product needs to be changed,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Arista Campus LAN Switches?

I use the solution for connectivity in data centers and LANs, providing Layer 2 and Layer 3 connectivity based on network needs.

See all answers

What do you like most about Cisco FabricPath?

The tool makes it easy to manage multi-layer networking and increases network efficiency. I haven't faced any challenges in integrating it into our existing infrastructure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco FabricPath?

Cisco is somewhat expensive, but it provides good quality products and operations, so I can't complain about licensing cost and setup costs. There is room for improvement in terms of pricing for th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco FabricPath?

In future updates, I would prefer to see features such as more AI functionality or better integration added to Cisco FabricPath; more AI would be useful.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 27% of the time

Cisco Nexus vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 26% of the time

Juniper QFabric vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 22% of the time

HPE ProCurve vs Arista Campus LAN Switches

Compared 12% of the time

More Arista Campus LAN Switches Competitors

Juniper QFabric vs Cisco FabricPath

Compared 44% of the time

ExtremeSwitching vs Cisco FabricPath

Compared 33% of the time

More Cisco FabricPath Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LAN Switching

January 2026

Download Arista Campus LAN Switches product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco FabricPath

January 2026

Download Cisco FabricPath product report

Also Known As

No data available

FabricPath

Overview

Arista Campus LAN Switches are the perfect network solution for your most demanding workloads.With native support for VMware Virtualization and hundreds of Linux applications integrated into hardware platforms designed to meet the stringent power and cooling requirements of today's most demanding data centers, Arista delivers the most efficient and best performing 10Gb Ethernet platforms.

Arista

Cisco FabricPath is a Cisco NX-OS software innovation combining the plug-and-play simplicity of Ethernet with the reliability and scalability of Layer 3 routing. Using FabricPath, you can build highly scalable Layer 2 multipath networks without the Spanning Tree Protocol. Such networks are particularly suitable for large virtualization deployments, private clouds, and high-performance computing (HPC) environments. The benefits of Cisco FabricPath include: Minimal commands per switch ease configuration and operation, Autodiscovery simplifies addition of new links and switches, Provision additional network bandwidth without impacting network, Supports one-, two-, or three-tier architectures, VLAN extensibility across the data center.

Cisco

Sample Customers

University of Winchester, AWE, picturemaxx, Medical Mutual, Leonix, CloudEra, National Physical Laboratory, Tri-State G&T, AIS, Morph, SingTel, SDSC, BBC

Bellevue, Calligaris, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Management Science Associates, Multi-Customer, Oediv, Roper St. Francis, SNAM

Buyer's Guide

Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Cisco FabricPath

December 2025

Free Report: Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Cisco FabricPath

Find out what your peers are saying about Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Cisco FabricPath and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Cisco FabricPath report.

See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.