Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Instant On Switches vs Dell PowerSwitch N-Series comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Dell Technologies are both solutions in the LAN Switching category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while Dell Technologies is ranked #12. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 10.5% mindshare in LS, compared to Dell Technologies’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Dell Technologies users who would recommend it.
Aruba Instant On Switches
Read 29 Aruba Instant On Switches reviews
  • 1,910 Views
  • 965 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Dell PowerSwitch N-Series
Read 2 Dell PowerSwitch N-Series reviews
  • 249 Views
  • 194 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Dell PowerSwitch N-Series and Aruba Instant On Switches compete in the network switching market. Aruba Instant On Switches seem to have an advantage due to their superior features, despite higher pricing.

Features: Dell PowerSwitch N-Series offers robust performance, scalability, and advanced security. Aruba Instant On Switches provide simplicity, remote management, and integration tailored for SMBs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell PowerSwitch N-Series offers straightforward deployment with strong support for complex environments. Aruba Instant On Switches allow for easier deployment and efficient customer service for fast setup.

Pricing and ROI: Dell PowerSwitch N-Series provides cost-effective setup with potential for quicker ROI in large installations. Aruba Instant On Switches require larger initial investments but offer long-term value for SMBs with modern features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Dell PowerSwitch N-Series Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Dell PowerSwitch N-Series
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Instant On Switches
Ranking in LAN Switching
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Dell PowerSwitch N-Series
Ranking in LAN Switching
12th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the LAN Switching category, the mindshare of Aruba Instant On Switches is 10.5%, up from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell PowerSwitch N-Series is 3.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
LAN Switching
 

Featured Reviews

MashukThakur - PeerSpot reviewer
A centrally managed switches ideal for small and medium businesses but does not have any console access
The solution does not have any console access. For example, if you do not have internet access on your side and you need to configure anything, you should at least have CLI access to do something or manage the solution to put to some IP. It will only work if we have a TSCT on the network. We can port and configure the initial settings before we get the Instant On Switches. I am not working deeply on Instant On devices. I have only installed it in a couple of accommodation sites. Even today, one customer has ordered to install 80 pieces of Instant On. I’ve to order additional 94 access points. I was confused about whether to go with Aruba Instant On or AP-505. Instant On has limited accessibility but AP-505 have cloud or local access on normal infrastructure. This would be better and easier to configure. So, there are further improvements in regard to console access and some limitations with access.
Read full review
Al Vasek - PeerSpot reviewer
Performs well, but the support and stability could be improved
There is a lack of support because there is a lack of adoption. Because Cisco switches are so widely used, anyone in the world can support them. It was two Cisco engineers who released Arista's code. In terms of programming functionality, they essentially duplicated the Cisco iOS, so all Cisco commands work on the Arista commands. You can do an Arista if you can do a Cisco. Aruba isn't all that different. It's a little different, but they have all of HPE's money and stuff behind it and things like that. I would say the same thing about Extreme or some of the other switches where it's penny-wise, pound-foolish. You save some money if you are a small shop with only one or two guys, it's understandable. Fortinet is now in the switch business, and they have their FortiSwitch devices, which are controlled by the FortiGate firewalls to do all of the programs. There is a lot to choose from. But, in my opinion, a lot of it is dependent on the use case and the customer type. Meraki is a nice little Cisco product for the right kind of business, but I wouldn't use it in an enterprise setting.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is plug-and-play and auto-configured."
"The product's initial setup phase is very simple."
"The online monitoring tool and the configuration of the application with the tool are valuable features."
"Aruba's management solutions, like Aruba Central are valuable."
"Aruba Central provides various AI features that we can use. It collects data on health and performance issues for wireless and wired clients."
"Its customer service is good."
"The dashboard for clients is very nice."
"The tool's best part is the commercials. Its pricing is lower compared to other enterprise products. We pitch the product to customers who have budget constraints. Its implementation is plug-and-play."
More Aruba Instant On Switches pros
"For a customer, it is easy to configure and to add ports through the LAN the GUI."
"Port density and port speed performance are both suitable. It has some appealing intangibles."
 

Cons

"In general, mostly in Instant On series, if we could have much more control on the switches, at least. We'd like a CLI access so that, when we want to do some advanced configurations we could."
"Some customers have made complaints about Aruba Instant On Switches' stability."
"The price has room for improvement."
"The solution’s GUI should be improved a bit."
"It could have an MSP portal version."
"The support needs improvement."
"Its scalability needs improvement."
"We are interested in acquiring a firewall that provides a comprehensive solution. In other words, we're seeking a firewall that encompasses multiple aspects, such as exceptional switches and active phone functionalities."
More Aruba Instant On Switches cons
"Customers do not prefer this to connect to multiple cities."
"Instead of competing at the enterprise level with that product, they should probably scale it. With all of the ports, they should develop a good mid-level business to truly scale it and gain adoption before attempting to go after the enterprise."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Aruba Instant On Switches is slightly cheaper than Cisco."
"The product has good pricing."
"If one is very bad, and ten is a very good price, I rate the tool's price as a six."
"Aruba Instant On Switches is cheaper than Cisco and expensive compared to some Chinese brand products."
"I give the price seven out of ten."
"We pay an annual licensing fee."
"Aruba Instant On Switches is not expensive."
"Pricing is competitive, and there are no supplementary fees."
More Aruba Instant On Switches pricing and cost advice
"You are selling it to larger customers and in larger environments, where it's a less expensive model than Cisco, which is attempting to use the same approach Arista did, but with a completely different programming language."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
24%
Comms Service Provider
13%
University
7%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Instant On Switches?
The solution has a simple deployment and zero border.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Instant On Switches?
I think the pricing for the switches is reasonable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Aruba Instant On Switches?
I have run into a couple of problems with the switches. Recently, one of the newer stacks stopped working and had to be rebooted individually. They don't have a lot of diagnostics tools, which coul...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

HPE ProCurve vs Aruba Instant On Switches Logo
HPE ProCurve vs Aruba Instant On Switches
Compared 47% of the time
Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Aruba Instant On Switches Logo
Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Aruba Instant On Switches
Compared 40% of the time
NETGEAR Switches vs Aruba Instant On Switches Logo
NETGEAR Switches vs Aruba Instant On Switches
Compared 13% of the time
More Aruba Instant On Switches Competitors
Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Dell PowerSwitch N-Series Logo
Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Dell PowerSwitch N-Series
Compared 70% of the time
Cisco Nexus vs Dell PowerSwitch N-Series Logo
Cisco Nexus vs Dell PowerSwitch N-Series
Compared 30% of the time
More Dell PowerSwitch N-Series Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Aruba Instant On Switches
April 2025
Aruba Instant On Switches reportDownload Aruba Instant On Switches product report
Buyer's Guide
LAN Switching
March 2025
Dell PowerSwitch N-Series reportDownload Dell PowerSwitch N-Series product report
 

Also Known As

Aruba Instant On 1930 Switches
No data available
 

Overview

The Aruba Instant On 1930 switches features advanced, smart-managed, fixed configuration Gigabit switches designed for small businesses that are easy-to-deploy and affordable. They’re made to handle today’s bandwidth-heavy applications like voice and video conferencing, enabling consistent connectivity to enhance performance. Using either the Instant On mobile app or the cloud-based web portal, you can quickly set up, monitor and manage the 1930 switch series from anywhere at any time. What’s more, up to 30 W PoE power delivery is available out-of-the-box for your class 4 PoE devices, like access points, surveillance cameras and VoIP phones, all easily managed from the same platform.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Dell PowerSwitch N-Series bring users efficient connections to the network with highly functional access and aggregation switching. Products consist of: Dell EMC Networking N1100 Series, Dell Networking N1500 Switches, Dell Networking N2000 Series, Dell Networking N3000 Series and Dell Networking N4000 Series.

Dell Technologies
 

Sample Customers

KEMET, Vestavia Hills City Schools, Dropbox
Norwich University of the Arts, Shelby American, City and Islington College
Buyer's Guide
Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Dell PowerSwitch N-Series
April 2025
Free Report: Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Dell PowerSwitch N-Series
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Dell PowerSwitch N-Series and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Dell PowerSwitch N-Series report.
See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.