Aspera Managed File Transfer vs JSCAPE by Redwood comparison

IBM and Redwood Software are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. IBM is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0, while Redwood Software is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.3. IBM holds a 3.5% mindshare in MFT, compared to Redwood Software’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Redwood Software users who would recommend it.

Aspera Managed File Transfer

Read 4 Aspera Managed File Transfer reviews

823 Views
587 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

JSCAPE by Redwood

Read 22 JSCAPE by Redwood reviews

1,057 Views
416 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Aspera Managed File Transfer

JSCAPE by Redwood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Aspera Managed File Transfer and JSCAPE by Redwood compete in the managed file transfer market. Aspera holds an advantage in speed with its high-speed transfer technology, whereas JSCAPE's strength lies in its comprehensive integration capabilities.

Features: Aspera Managed File Transfer offers high-speed transfers with FASP technology, ensuring rapid and secure data movement. It provides robust security features and supports scalable deployment for growing business needs. JSCAPE by Redwood stands out with multi-protocol support, advanced automation features, and extensive system integration options, making it ideal for businesses seeking flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aspera Managed File Transfer offers an easy deployment process focused on speed, with a strong support team for rapid transfer setups. JSCAPE by Redwood provides a flexible deployment model, emphasizing personalized customer service for complex system integrations.

Pricing and ROI: Aspera Managed File Transfer requires a significant initial investment, offering good ROI for businesses needing fast transfers. JSCAPE by Redwood presents a more cost-effective solution, with long-term ROI associated with its integration capabilities and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aspera Managed File Transfer

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JSCAPE by Redwood

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Aspera Managed File Transfer is 3.5%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JSCAPE by Redwood is 2.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Beneficial quick protocol, powerful, but limited use cases

Aspera Managed File Transfer should be packaged into another solution. Explaining to customers you need to have multiple solutions from multiple vendors for their use cases can get complicated for them to understand. The best way to propose a suite is to have an integrated suite where the customer could choose to license part of it. This solution could be one solution not two choices between 10 or 12 different solutions. The main feature of Aspera Managed File Transfer is the communication protocol, which is fast. There are a lot of different clients that are offering features related to these fast protocols. It's possible to create one unique suite that can handle this base protocol. It will be quite easy to propose to the customers.

Read full review

Akshatha Ramesh

Junior Business Analyst at EFI

Good automation, no complex coding, and high-level data encryption

When it comes to performance and scalability, JSCAPE is a highly reliable software, however, I would suggest a few improvements: 1. The documentation needs a revamp for a better understanding of the features of the tool. 2. Customer service can be offered on call or chat. 3. The initial setup is time-consuming; it could use a video tutorial. 4. UI can be improved in terms of look and feel. 5. Documentation should be provided for a majority of newly released features as these can be difficult for a layman to use without proper instructions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We were able to effectively nullify the China firewall since the China firewall was disrupting our data transfer."

"The main feature of Aspera Managed File Transfer is that it's an incredibly fast protocol, you can use all the bandwidth available. If I need to send large amounts of data this is the fastest protocol on the market. I have been using it for some minor projects and it is very powerful."

"We were able to effectively nullify the China firewall since the China firewall was disrupting our data transfer."

"Good user interface and ability to set up multiple file transfer jobs."

"Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites with lower bandwidth and in less time."

"It is platform-independent and can flawlessly work on any operating system using the latest security standards."

"It is a reliable and easy-to-operate platform for secure file transfers."

"One of the standout features of this particular tool is its automation capabilities."

"It keeps a clear record of all the file transfers that take place, the person who initiated them, and the outcome of the execution."

"The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering."

"The tool can transfer files of any size and type without any issue."

"It helped in confidentially transferring files with a vast number of servers available with no external applications required."

"Triggers are something that is very useful as they automate the use of boilerplate code, and we can define certain functionality of certain tasks also."

More JSCAPE by Redwood pros

Cons

"If there is any failure in the data transfer and it can automatically detect and reinitiate it, that would be great."

"Aspera Managed File Transfer should be packaged into another solution. Explaining to customers you need to have multiple solutions from multiple vendors for their use cases can get complicated for them to understand."

"If you want to do a file transfer between two countries, and one is not China, then you have other more affordable options."

"The solution's pricing is high and should be reduced."

"Deployment is complex and it was difficult to get support."

"Enhancing the user interface would make it more accessible and appealing to the new users and it will definitely enhance the user experience."

"Iteratively enhancing the user interface could help with streamlining workflows to make them more intuitive and user-friendly."

"JSCAPE ensures data integrity. You know that the file has been transferred and on which date, as we provide timestamps."

"Setup is time-consuming."

"The FTP/S and ad-hoc techniques can further be automated."

"The product's pricing needs improvement."

"The documentation part can be improved to be more precise for beginners to understand the advanced features of the tool."

"The JSCAPE team could create detailed documents or blogs on how to troubleshoot certain errors that come over in integration with existing environment tools."

More JSCAPE by Redwood cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Aspera Managed File Transfer is not an inexpensive solution. I am not aware of many competitors to determine how affordable the price is overall."

"It was close to $10,000 to $20,000."

"The software is expensive compared to other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aspera Managed File Transfer?

Aspera Managed File Transfer is an optimal solution for customers who want to transfer large files to remote sites with lower bandwidth and in less time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aspera Managed File Transfer?

There are other products of Aspera which come as add-ons, however, we haven't purchased those, like report generation, since that was not our requirement. The features we needed were included in th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aspera Managed File Transfer?

We have an office in China, and we wanted to transfer data from China to the UK. We have an office in the UK as well.

See all answers

What do you like most about JSCAPE?

The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JSCAPE?

I rate the product’s pricing a three out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JSCAPE?

JSCAPE ensures data integrity. You know that the file has been transferred and on which date, as we provide timestamps. We handle cybersecurity ourselves with proprietary technologies for the netwo...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 78% of the time

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 12% of the time

webMethods.io vs Aspera Managed File Transfer

Compared 9% of the time

More Aspera Managed File Transfer Competitors

GoAnywhere MFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 29% of the time

MOVEit vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 27% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 19% of the time

Kiteworks vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

Globalscape EFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

More JSCAPE by Redwood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

April 2025

Download Aspera Managed File Transfer product report

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood

April 2025

Download JSCAPE by Redwood product report

Overview

IBM Aspera takes a different approach to tackling the challenges of big data movement over global WANs. Rather than optimize or accelerate data transfer, Aspera eliminates underlying bottlenecks by using its proprietary fasp technology that fully utilizes available network bandwidth to maximize speed and quickly scale up with no theoretical limit. Using fasp, transfers are secure end-to-end and are largely unaffected by file size, transfer distance, or network conditions, making transfer times up to 100Xs faster than TCP-based protocols.

IBM Aspera offers SaaS, on-prem, and hybrid solutions to meet the needs of modernizing infrastructures. All solutions offer robust security and compliance, intuitive file sharing, workflow automation, central administration, and real-time visibility. Quickly and easily initiate transfers across hybrid infrastructures, including support for cloud-to-cloud transfers. IBM Aspera offers unmatched transfer speeds, end-to-end security, reliability, and exceptional bandwidth control.

IBM

JSCAPE platform offers independent managed file transfer (MFT) software that allows users to secure and automate data exchange with trading partners, clients and internal transfers. Built-in security features and audit functions support PCI DSS, HIPAA, GLBA and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. SaaS (MFTaaS) offering available.

Redwood Software

Sample Customers

Gwinnett County Public Schools, Evonik, Voith, BITMARCK, Oracle

BAE Systems, ABN AMRO, Boeing, Bank of America, Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, Bank of Montreal, General Dynamics, Bank of Taiwan, General Electric, Citibank Canada, Honeywell, CreditSuisse, L-3 Communications, Columbia University, Harvard Medical School, Kaplan Higher Education, Northwest Christian College, Kaiser Permanente, Share Builder, Procter & Gamble, TransUnion, Roche Diagnostics, BASF, 1-800-Contacts, Canon, AMPM, Daimler AG, Coach, Edwards Brothers, USB Financial Services

Buyer's Guide

Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

March 2025

Free Report: Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

Find out what your peers are saying about Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. JSCAPE by Redwood report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.