Ataccama ONE Platform vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest comparison

Ataccama and erwin by Quest are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Ataccama is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while erwin by Quest is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. Ataccama holds a 2.6% mindshare in DG, compared to erwin by Quest’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of erwin by Quest users who would recommend it.

Ataccama ONE Platform

Read 6 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews

1,281 Views
865 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

erwin Data Intelligence by ...

Read 18 erwin Data Intelligence by Quest reviews

3,730 Views
972 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

erwin Data Intelligence by ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Ataccama ONE Platform and erwin Data Intelligence by Quest compete in data management and governance. While Ataccama offers scalability and adaptability in a cohesive suite, erwin is favored for its detailed data lineage and governance capabilities.

Features: Ataccama ONE Platform includes data quality management, master data management, and collaborative data stewardship. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is recognized for metadata management, advanced data cataloging, and enterprise architecture integration.

Room for Improvement: Ataccama could enhance its data lineage capabilities, refine basic metadata handling, and improve initial setup procedures. erwin might benefit from simplifying user interface, increasing flexibility in deployments, and reducing its learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ataccama ONE Platform supports cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments with robust technical assistance. erwin offers streamlined cloud deployment and extensive training resources for quick implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Ataccama ONE Platform presents a higher initial cost but delivers ROI through comprehensive, integrated features. erwin Data Intelligence offers competitive pricing with faster ROI, driven by its specialized tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (5th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (5th)

erwin Data Intelligence by ...

Ranking in Data Governance

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 2.6%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is 2.3%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments

We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.

Read full review

Roy Pollack

Advisor Application Architect at CPS Energy

The solution provides more profound insights into legacy data movements, lineages, and definitions in the short term.

We have loaded over 300,000 attributes and more than 1000 mappings. The performance is slow, depending on the lineage or search. This is supposed to be fixed in the later versions, but we haven't upgraded yet. The integration with various metadata sources, including erwin Data Modeler, isn't smooth in the current version. It took some experimentation to get things working. We hope this is improved in the newer version. The initial version we used felt awkward because Erwin implemented features from other companies into their offering.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"The solution saves time in data discovery and understanding our entire organization's data."

"They have just the most marvelous reports called mind maps, where whatever you are focused on sits in the middle. They have this wonderful graphic spiderweb that spreads out from there where you can see this thing mapped to other logical bits or physical bits and who's the steward of it. It's very cool and available to your business teams through a portal."

"The possibility to write automation scripts is the biggest benefit for us. We have several products with metadata and metadata mapping capabilities. The big difference when we were choosing this product was the ability to run automation scripts against metadata and metadata mappings. Right now, we have a very high level of automation based on these automation scripts, so it's really the core feature for us."

"We use the codeset mapping quite a bit to match value pairs to use within the conversion as well. Those value pair mappings come in quite handy and are utilized quite extensively. They then feed into the automation of the source data extraction, like the source data mapping of the source data extraction, the code development, forward engineering using the ODI connector for the forward automation."

"It is a central place for everybody to start any ETL data pipeline builds. This tool is being heavily used, plus it's heavily integrated with all the ETL data pipeline design and build processes. Nobody can bypass these processes and do something without going through this tool."

"The interface is easy to use. I also like Erwin's automatic data classification and data quality checks."

"Data Intelligence creates a single source of truth for all of our metadata. This solution is better for data warehousing, but the metadata features speed up our development work. It's easy to create and manage mappings because we can export them to Informatica and pick up the work where we left off."

"The data mapping manager is the most valuable feature."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest pros

Cons

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"Data movement is a pain."

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"The data quality assessment requires third-party components and a separate license."

"The integration with various metadata sources, including erwin Data Modeler, isn't smooth in the current version. It took some experimentation to get things working. We hope this is improved in the newer version. The initial version we used felt awkward because Erwin implemented features from other companies into their offering."

"The SDK behind this entire product needs improvement. The company really should focus more on this because we were finding some inconsistencies on the LDK level. Everything worked fine from the UI perspective, but when we started doing some deep automation scripts going through multiple API calls inside the tool, then only some pieces of it work or it would not return the exact data it was supposed to do."

"Really huge datasets, where the logical names or the lexicons weren't groomed or maintained well, were the only area where it really had room for improvement. A huge data set would cause erwin to crash. If there were half a million or 1 million tables, erwin would hang."

"It's a little bit clunky. I think a lot of these features were bolted on, and they don't necessarily transition smoothly in the interface. I would like to see a little more cohesion."

"The technical support could be improved."

"There may be some opportunities for improvement in terms of the user interface to make it a little bit more intuitive. They have made some good progress. Originally, when we started, we were on version 9 or 10. Over the last couple of releases, I've seen some improvements that they have made, but there might be a few other additional areas in UI where they can make some enhancements."

"The metadata ingestion is very nice because of the ability to automate it. It would be nice to be able to do this ingestion, or set it up, from one place, instead of having to set it up separately for every data asset that is ingested."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"We operate on a yearly subscription and because it is an enterprise license we only have one. It is not dependent on the number of users."

"The price is reasonable, and a subscription is required."

"The whole suite, not just the DI but the modeling software, the harvester, Mapping Manager — everything we have — is about $100,000 a year for our renewals. That works out to each module being something like $8,000 to $10,000."

"The price is too high."

"The licensing cost is around $7,000 for user. This is an estimation."

"You buy a seat license for your portal. We have 100 seats for the portal, then you buy just the development licenses for the people who are going to put the data in."

"The solution is aggressively priced."

"erwin is cheaper than other solutions and this should appeal to other buyers. It has a good price tag."

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

See all answers

What do you like most about erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The data mapping manager is the most valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The price is reasonable, and a subscription is required.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?

The data quality assessment requires third-party components and a separate license. I would like to have better integration around the data quality. I would appreciate the inclusion of a non-struct...

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 22% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 18% of the time

Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 34% of the time

Collibra Governance vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 20% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 13% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 9% of the time

Collibra Lineage vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Compared 8% of the time

More erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform

March 2025

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

March 2025

Download erwin Data Intelligence by Quest product report

Also Known As

No data available

erwin DG, erwin Data Governance

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform is a comprehensive data management and governance solution designed to address the challenges faced by organizations in managing and leveraging their data assets. Its primary use case is to enable organizations to gain control over their data, improve data quality, and ensure compliance with data regulations.

The most valuable functionality of Ataccama ONE includes data profiling, data quality management, data integration, master data management, and metadata management. These features allow organizations to understand the quality and structure of their data, integrate data from various sources, create a single view of their master data, and manage metadata to ensure data lineage and governance.

By leveraging Ataccama ONE, organizations can achieve several benefits. Firstly, it helps in improving data quality by identifying and resolving data issues, ensuring accurate and reliable data for decision-making. Secondly, it enables organizations to streamline data integration processes, reducing the time and effort required for data integration projects. Thirdly, it facilitates effective master data management, enabling organizations to have a consistent and accurate view of their critical data entities. Lastly, it helps organizations in complying with data regulations by providing data lineage, data privacy, and data governance capabilities.

Ataccama

The erwin Data Intelligence Suite (erwin DI) combines data catalog and data literacy capabilities for greater awareness of and access to available data assets, guidance on their use, and guardrails to ensure data policies and best practices are followed. Automatically harvest, transform and feed metadata from a wide array of data sources, operational processes, business applications and data models into a central data catalog. Then make it accessible and understandable within context via role-based views. This complete metadata-driven approach to data governance facilitates greater IT and business collaboration.

erwin by Quest

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

Oracle, Infosys, GSK, Toyota Motor Sales, HSBC

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

January 2025

Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest

Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.