Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ataccama ONE Platform vs erwin Data Intelligence by Quest comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.6
erwin Data Intelligence by Quest offers responsive and knowledgeable support with varying resolution times and generally high customer satisfaction.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.4
Erwin Data Intelligence needs enhanced API consistency, UI simplicity, better large dataset handling, and improved AI, support, and integration features.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.0
Erwin Data Intelligence is scalable for various user needs, despite lacking advanced cloud tools, with effective metadata handling.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
erwin Data Intelligence offers competitive pricing with user and module licenses, potential discounts, and automation for cost efficiency.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
Erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is stable and reliable, with minor issues resolved quickly, ensuring continued user confidence.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.4
Erwin Data Intelligence enhances data governance with automation, metadata management, visualization, and seamless integration for efficient data handling.
 

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform
Ranking in Data Governance
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Data Quality (7th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (6th)
erwin Data Intelligence by ...
Ranking in Data Governance
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 2.1%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of erwin Data Intelligence by Quest is 2.8%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance
 

Featured Reviews

Gazi Salauddin - PeerSpot reviewer
Robust data management and governance praised for its user-friendly interface and scalability, but potential drawbacks include the need for improvements in search functionality
The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance. They extract rules, and create factor automation, ensuring streamlined governance, especially for similar classifieds. The process involves defined steps and adjustable parameters that seamlessly integrate into the worklist components. Daily operations and background runs are accommodated within the workflow, maximizing possibilities for Acronis use cases. Data profiling and masking, where understanding data details is crucial for security without compromising confidentiality. is well-utilized across different fronts, offering a user-friendly experience for making decisions on data storage, classification, and mapping. The front-end interface is particularly commendable, facilitating easy understanding, and the back-end process in Ataccama ensures the completion of classifier profiling and metadata tagging.
Roy Pollack - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution provides more profound insights into legacy data movements, lineages, and definitions in the short term.
We have loaded over 300,000 attributes and more than 1000 mappings. The performance is slow, depending on the lineage or search. This is supposed to be fixed in the later versions, but we haven't upgraded yet. The integration with various metadata sources, including erwin Data Modeler, isn't smooth in the current version. It took some experimentation to get things working. We hope this is improved in the newer version. The initial version we used felt awkward because Erwin implemented features from other companies into their offering.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
8%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?
The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.
What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?
The focus for future improvements lies in strengthening the handling of unstructured data. This entails adapting to new environments, extracting data from platforms such as Slack or Teams, and crea...
What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?
Primarily, the use cases pertain to the governance classification of metadata.
What do you like most about erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?
The data mapping manager is the most valuable feature.
What needs improvement with erwin Data Intelligence by Quest?
The data quality assessment requires third-party components and a separate license. I would like to have better integration around the data quality. I would appreciate the inclusion of a non-struct...
 

Also Known As

No data available
erwin DG, erwin Data Governance
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library
Oracle, Infosys, GSK, Toyota Motor Sales, HSBC
Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.